Channel
@BTC_intraday
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
386subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001555012232 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BTC_intraday |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BTC_intraday |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:12 | 386 | -7 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 22:28 | 393 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:34 | 395 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:00 | 397 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 398 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:24 | 398 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
38 reactions across 13 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 19 | 50.0% | |
| ❤ | 17 | 44.7% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2025 to 4 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
BTC UPDATE BTC has held major support around 65k$ Currently, we can target the 77K$ zone first and the 85K$ if it breaks out further This is just a Monthly Pullback so the market will be bearish if 85k$ is not broken
👍3❤1
66K$ is a Good support mostly BtC should long from here Tomorrow is NON FARM PAYROLL expecting a volatile day
👍3
87K$ did not hold 84K$ is the immediate support Mostly BTC is going to 70k$ zone in few weeks
👍1
As expected 98K$ has been tested and got rejected. BTC needs to Hold 87K$ else we may go as low as 72K$ No specific reason to be bullish at the moment
👍3
https://x.com/swap_crypto/status/2009913524970229841?s=20
❤1
$BTC UPDATE: As updated earlier, 94k$ is a very strong resistance. BTC is at 90K$ pullback zone and expecting a move upside. Once BTC breaks 94K$, we can see 98K being tested. Let's see how far BTC can push. Cannot be bullish until we break below 84K$ $ETH should take support at 3070$ and SOL around 130$ before a bounce on upside.
❤3
BTC UPDATE: Most people are bearish on BTC. But BTC has bottomed on the 1D timeframe. All we need is a nominal push from this demand zone. Here is what I am expecting. BULL CASE: In case BTC reaches $88,000, it will try to break the $94,000 resistance, which is very strong. Anything above 94K$ will push BTC to 99K$ and further to 107K$ BEAR CASE: By any chance, after today's FOMC, if we break the low of 85000$, we …
🫡2❤1
BTC UPDATE!! On 1D Timeframe, $BTC is at strong resistance of 94000$ Now 89000$ has to hold Anything above 94000$ will take BTC to $104K Below Cyan trendline or 85000$, BTC will go up to or below 75K zone
👍2
https://x.com/swap_crypto/status/1996186275028799725?s=20
https://t.me/cryptopreneurYT/1/44562
BTC short-term bottom is in 80k$ should hold Expecting a pullback
👍4
BTC INTRADAY UPDATES pinned «$BTC failed to cross 115K$ Now 90-92k will hold»
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BTC_intraday. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BTC INTRADAY UPDATES” (@BTC_intraday), 386 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BTC_intraday.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.