Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BTC關注組

Channel

BTC關注組

@BTC_Hongkong_crypto

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

174subscribers

-61 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002402237418
TypeChannel
Username@BTC_Hongkong_crypto
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/BTC_Hongkong_crypto

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

174235204.57 August 2026 — 235 subscribers8 August 2026 — 235 subscribers15 August 2026 — 226 subscribers23 August 2026 — 213 subscribers31 August 2026 — 200 subscribers10 September 2026 — 192 subscribers17 September 2026 — 174 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 41 days, net -61. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 165–244 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 16:59174-18
10 Sept 2026, 10:00192-8
31 Aug 2026, 11:39200-13
23 Aug 2026, 21:23213-13
15 Aug 2026, 06:33226-9
8 Aug 2026, 10:02235no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:32235first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 19 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤240.0%
👍240.0%
😭120.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 December 2025 to 9 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Apr 2026, 08:30 UTC207 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

【Bitcoin 量子末日 ... 😱】外媒報道,近日 Google 向 Bitcoin 用戶發出警告,能夠摧毀區塊鏈的電腦即將到來,並指出「量子電腦」可能只需比原先預期更少的量子位元和量子閘,就能破解保護 Bitcoin 區塊鏈的橢圓曲線加密技術。 據《Forbes》報道,Google 量子演算法研究總監 Ryan Babbush 指出,由於量子運算研發的快速發展,破解橢圓曲線密碼所需的實體量子位元數量已減少了 20 倍。隨著量子運算技術成熟,加上 Bitcoin 自身結構上的限制,他呼籲 Bitcoin 持有者應有心理準備,Bitcoin 很快就會變得不安全。 Ryan Babbush 指出,Bitcoin 面臨的問題尤其嚴重。當初 Bitcoin 為了以較短的密鑰換取更高的交易效率,而選用了當時被視為安全的橢圓曲線密碼學,這種取捨在當時是可以接受的;但隨著量子運算的出現,這大大縮短了 Bitcoin 向抗量子密碼學過渡…

❤1

6 Feb 2026, 00:43 UTC307 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

比特幣狂瀉不止,最新跌至60060美元,較12.6萬美元高位已蒸發超過一半市值。股神巴菲特曾說比特幣沒有內在價值,難道是正確的? 財經Media竟然出啲仲係維持喺BTC等於scam嘅出發點上面

19 Jan 2026, 02:20 UTC408 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Shit! BTC大棍摳落去 92,471 USD! BTC關注組TG Livechat https://t.me/+n1z9qqcwJc9mZTE1 CryptoHK 香港幣圈關注組 https://t.me/+PDNIAAJ4QvlhYTI1

😭1

18 Jan 2026, 07:02 UTC289 viewsread 8 August 2026

BTC關注組 https://t.me/BTC_Hongkong_crypto BTC關注組TG Livechat https://t.me/+n1z9qqcwJc9mZTE1 CryptoHK 香港幣圈關注組 https://t.me/+PDNIAAJ4QvlhYTI1

14 Jan 2026, 06:17 UTC244 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

話咗係VCP就係VCP 除夕晚同大家講 之後係升!!! 留意開加密貨幣,歡迎入group吹下水 BTC關注組Live Chat Group https://t.me/+n1z9qqcwJc9mZTE1 CryptoHK 香港幣圈關注組 https://t.me/+PDNIAAJ4QvlhYTI1

👍1

13 Jan 2026, 03:17 UTC152 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

一名自稱「幣少爺」的90后,一句「錢從天降」,一場「鈔票雨」,讓他一戰成名。這場看似炫富的鬧劇,背后究竟隱藏著怎樣的驚天騙局?短短五年間,他從無名之輩淪為國際紅色通緝犯。假礦機、空氣幣、虛擬交易所——他是如何將一堆毫無價值的數字,包裝成眾人追捧的財富密碼?​​ ​​請看今天的故事:《深水撒錢》​​ 你可能聽說過「紅包雨」,但你有沒有見過現實中的「鈔票雨」呢? 2018年12月15日下午2點45分,香港深水埗,一名男子開著一輛紅色林寶堅尼來到黃金電腦商場外,隨后高舉雙手大喊:「你們要錢嗎?錢可以天降!」話音剛落,大量百元紙鈔從旁邊大廈的天台傾瀉而下,整條街頓時炸開了鍋。路人紛紛加入這場瘋狂的搶錢大戰,街頭一片混亂,交通完全癱瘓。 警方接到報案后火速趕到,用喇叭不斷呼喊:「撿到錢的請立即上交并登記資料!」但撒錢者早已消失得無影無蹤。當晚,這段撒錢視訊迅速傳遍全網,眾人議論紛紛:這是哪個土豪?香港有錢人都這麼任性嗎? 這…

❤1

7 Jan 2026, 16:17 UTC219 viewsread 8 August 2026

【山寨季前奏?AI 幣跑贏大市,XRP 企穩 $2】 焦點: 資金開始由 BTC 輪動至 Altcoins。今日最搶鏡唔係 XRP,而係 AI 板塊!Render (RENDER) 升 20%,Sui (SUI) 升 15%。 XRP 更新: XRP 繼續在 $2.02 附近整固,成功將 $1.96 阻力變支撐。 策略: 香港投資者除咗望實 BTC,係時候做定功課留意 AI 同公鏈幣種。 留意開加密貨幣,歡迎入group吹下水 BTC關注組Live Chat Group https://t.me/+n1z9qqcwJc9mZTE1 CryptoHK 香港幣圈關注組 https://t.me/+PDNIAAJ4QvlhYTI1

7 Jan 2026, 15:58 UTC179 viewsread 8 August 2026

【比特幣回落至91,000美元水平,市場小幅調整】 比特幣今日繼續回落,跌穿92,000美元,現報約91,000至91,800美元,24小時跌幅約2-3%。主要受亞洲交易時段賣盤影響,未能突破94,500美元阻力位。分析師如Bernstein認為市場已見底,2026年仍有反彈空間,可能測試105,000美元。但短期要小心美聯儲言論同宏觀因素。香港投資者注意,比特幣ETF流入仍穩,長線持有者唔使驚。 留意開加密貨幣,歡迎入group吹下水 BTC關注組Live Chat Group https://t.me/+n1z9qqcwJc9mZTE1 CryptoHK 香港幣圈關注組 https://t.me/+PDNIAAJ4QvlhYTI1

7 Jan 2026, 05:43 UTC180 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

美股tg group https://t.me/+XWWGKmIsDls3NTc1 https://t.me/+XWWGKmIsDls3NTc1 https://t.me/+XWWGKmIsDls3NTc1 有玩美股必入!

6 Jan 2026, 03:18 UTC118 viewsread 8 August 2026

31/12個post,我記一世! 當晚有用戶分享除夕小故事,我轉發上FB想吸引多啲朋友入來傾BTC 點解大多數留言只係話呃人 https://www.facebook.com/groups/1478700849732372/posts/1950451979223921/ 留言個個又話jpex又話KK園 笑死

6 Jan 2026, 03:05 UTC169 viewsread 8 August 2026

BTC最新報 93691 USD 曾一度升至94789.08 USD 留意開加密貨幣,歡迎入group吹下水 BTC關注組Live Chat Group https://t.me/+n1z9qqcwJc9mZTE1

6 Jan 2026, 02:43 UTC143 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

屈尻我詐騙的,而家可以一巴打落你面度! 31/12 BTC關注組 講過 會有跡象VCP 當時BTC 88340 鎂 結果真係開始升 之前最高上到去94789.08,應該好快重回10萬 希望大家唔好再用有色眼鏡 去睇呢個TG Channel 根本唔係呃錢 唔好一聽到加密貨幣、虛擬貨幣、比特幣,就話呃錢 只係純粹想 有一個渠道比相信加密貨幣嘅人 有監察比特幣升跌同吹水嘅地方 裁圖為 BTC 93000前日,之後 開始再升緊! BTC關注組Channel https://t.me/BTC_Hongkong_crypto BTC關注組Live Chat Group https://t.me/+n1z9qqcwJc9mZTE1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @BTC_Hongkong_crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BTC關注組” (@BTC_Hongkong_crypto), 174 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BTC_Hongkong_crypto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.