Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐁𝐑𝐀𝐃𝐋𝐄𝐘.

Channel

𝐁𝐑𝐀𝐃𝐋𝐄𝐘.

@BR3DXLY

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

33subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 14 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004447794328
TypeChannel
Username@BR3DXLY
First recorded14 October 2026
Last confirmed live14 October 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/BR3DXLY

Growth

3314 Oct 2026, 17:47 — 33 subscribers14 Oct 2026, 18:22 — 33 subscribers14 Oct 2026, 17:4714 Oct 2026, 18:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32–34 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Oct 2026, 18:2233no change
14 Oct 2026, 17:4733first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
296.1%
avg views ÷ 33 subscribers
Avg views / post
97.7
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026
Posts held15 (6 August 2026 – 6 October 2026)
Views total684
Reactions total28
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Oct 2026, 18:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
5
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

48 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍓1429.2%
💋1225.0%
🍾918.8%
💯510.4%
custom 547193054147119779036.25%
custom 547202682175307065836.25%
🆒24.17%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 10 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @BR3DXLY. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 6 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Oct 2026, 21:41 UTC47 viewsread 14 October 2026

🔤обавление: Возможно, сделаю список желаемых в сюжете персон и начну поиски дневников и попытаюсь заключить с их авторами коннект.

Signed — 𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗂𝖺.

6 Oct 2026, 21:39 UTC45 viewsread 14 October 2026

#𝐕𝐨𝐢𝐜𝐞𝐨𝐟𝐇𝐨𝐧𝐨𝐫 🔤одвожу итоги опроса. Первым сюжетным дополнением, как я и полагала, будет история Маг. Британии до 2000-х годов, в рамках которых, собственно и происходит сюжет в моем дневнике. Вас, мои рубины, услышала. Ждите пост, так как у меня уже чешутся ручки создать что-то поистине чудесное. 🔤о скорых встреч в новом сюжете. Возможно, сделаю набор на сюжет, в котором включу только тех, у кого есть Постхог и чь…

Signed — 𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗂𝖺.

6 Oct 2026, 18:48 UTC45 views5 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🍓2💋1custom 54719305414711977901custom 54720268217530706581

Signed — 𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗂𝖺.

26 Sept 2026, 11:16 UTC98 views3 reactionsread 14 October 2026
File

#𝐇𝐮𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐕𝐢𝐧𝐲𝐥𝐬 — 🔤днажды я вновь буду рядом, душа моя. Только живи.

🍾1💋1💯1

Signed — 𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗂𝖺.

26 Sept 2026, 08:31 UTC83 views16 reactions2 Starsread 14 October 2026
Photo

🖼🥀 𝑨 𝑺𝑻𝑶𝑹𝒀 𝑭𝑶𝑹 𝑨𝑮𝑬𝑺 🥀🖼— 𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐚𝐠𝐞𝐝 𝐛𝐲 𝐫.𝐬𝐤𝐞𝐞𝐭𝐞𝐫. АРХИВ ПРОРОКА. ЗАПИСИ ЗА 2000 год. 🎀𝐢𝐬𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐫: Информация о биографии Алисы намерена искажена в угоду пропаганды, осуществляемой Пророком. Так что если у Вас возникло ложное чувство, то эффект верен. 🔤ак как сегодня нашему отделу редакции исполняется юбилейные пять лет, мы не можем не рассказать вам о журналистах, благодаря которым наша работа становится все интереснее и…

🍓8💋3💯3🍾1🆒1

Signed — 𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗂𝖺.

19 Sept 2026, 16:53 UTC114 views3 reactionsread 14 October 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🍓1🍾1💋1

Signed — 𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗂𝖺.

19 Sept 2026, 16:43 UTC252 views1 reactions10 Starsread 14 October 2026
Photo

🌟🌟 🌟🌟 🤩апись первая. Репортаж первый. — Макияж? — В полном порядке, мисс Скитер. — отозвалась Маргарет, помощница визажиста из гримерки. — Прическа? — О, высший класс, моя дорогая! — с благоговением воскликнул месье Гильот, услуживо протягивая Рите меховое пальто. — Нет времени ждать. Бегом, Брэдли, бегом! — срывалась на крик мисс Скитер, проталкивая девушку в глубину зала, где её уже ждали оператор и режиссер. Вз…

🆒1

Signed — 𝗍𝗋𝖾𝗂𝖺.

8 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC278 views10 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤍𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐬 𝐝𝐢𝐝 𝐡𝐚𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐧 𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐞, 𝐧𝐨 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐫 𝐰𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐢𝐭 𝐛𝐞. 🔤мя, которое знают тысячи волшебников по всей Англии, но боятся даже думать о нем. Тот, кого нельзя называть. Монстр, пробравшийся с самых низов к могуществу и власти. Он победил. Гарри Поттера больше нет. (??) Никого из тех, кто за нас сражался, больше нет. 🤩лавы в комментариях.

💋4🍓3🍾3

7 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC234 views6 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩 🤍𝐟 𝐰𝐞 𝐛𝐮𝐫𝐧, 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐛𝐮𝐫𝐧 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐮𝐬. 🔤реди темных коридоров редакции «Ежедневного Пророка» прячутся голоса. Голоса тех, кого не сломила даже железная рука Министерства Магии. Они еще говорят тихо, оглядываясь назад, проверяя, нет ли кого, кто мог бы раскрыть их истинные намерения. Но рано или поздно, их голоса станут громче, и они будут не говорить, а кричать. 🎀𝐨𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐬: 𝟏. Принимаю в коннекты дневники только по …

🍾2💋1💯1custom 54719305414711977901custom 54720268217530706581

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @BR3DXLY. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐁𝐑𝐀𝐃𝐋𝐄𝐘.” (@BR3DXLY), 33 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BR3DXLY.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.