The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 20 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.

Channel
أبو بكر الموحد الباكستاني-٢
@BKBW99
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
193subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002234110825 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BKBW99 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BKBW99 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:07 | 193 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 194 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 197 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 197 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:50 | 196 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- —
- no view readings in window
- Avg views / post
- —
- no view readings
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 November 2024 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | — |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 00s
- Average length
- 40s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
162 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 95 | 58.6% | |
| 👍 | 59 | 36.4% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 3.70% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 1.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 November 2024 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
الرجاء من المشرفين السابقين التواصل معنا على هذا الحساب: @Muslim111064
بِسمِـ الله الرّحمٰنِ الرّحِيمـ نعيد نشر أرشيف نواقض حكومة سوريا الجديدة (حكومة أحمد الشرع) بعد حذف القناة من قبل التليقرام والله المستعان، ساهموا في نشره واحتسبوا بذلك الأجر، جزاكم الله خيراً ونفع بكم. https://t.me/KSG20900
❤9
اقترب شهر رمضان، فسارعوا إلى العزيز الجبار، وهلموا إلى هجران الهواتف والأقلام، والمسارعة في اغتنام رضا الرحمن. واعلموا يا من اتخذتم ملة إبراهيم إمام الموحدين دينا ومنهالا، أنكم أمة لا تنصر بعلو في العتاد المادي، إنما تنصرون بما تعدونه لله -عز وجل- في جوف الليل وأثناء النهار من تبتل وخضوع لله -عز وجل- فدونكم شهر الغفران. وإني أبلغكم بأنني سأتوقف عن النشر في القناة إلى حين انتهاء شهر رمضان المبارك إن شاء الله.
❤12👍2
حول مناظرة أحد الإخوة مع عثمان الخميس: رأيت بالأمس مناظرة جمعت بين موحد لله وعالم من علماء المشركين الجاهلين بلا إله إلا الله المتنكبين عن حملها والناقصين من قدرها والداعين لنقضها والمتولين لأعدائها والمحاربين لحملتها الذين لم يبدلوا تبديلًا، وجرى الأمر على مجريات السنن الإلهية، فكانت الغلبة للعابد الموحد على حبر الشرك العالم المزين للشرك والداعي له، {وَلَن يَجْعَلَ اللَّهُ لِلْكَافِرِينَ عَلَى الْمُؤْمِنِينَ سَبِي…
👍8❤7
سنتحالف مع الهندوس، ونبني لهم المعابد في دمشق إذا كانوا سينصروننا على بشار! كلمة تقيئا بها إحدى طغام الأحلام من قادات -عديم الشرع- في الشام قبل قليل في لقاء مرئي تقيئ به ما شاء أن يتقيأ ثم أسند تقيؤه إلى المصالح والمفاسد زورا، وليس المقام إرشاداً إلى فساد القول وقائله الذي أنشئ بنسج عنكبوت وشل وقضى عليه به الكتاب المنزل، بل هو بيان لحقارة قدر -لا إله إلا الله- في قلوبهم إذ إن المصلحة والمفسدة في الشرع المنزل إذ تعا…
❤4👍3
Sticker, posted without a caption
أتى النبيَّ صلى اللهُ عليهِ و سلمَ رجلٌ يستحملُه فلمْ يجدْ عندهُ ما يتحملُهُ فدلَّه على آخرٍ فحملَهُ فأتى النبيَّ صلى اللهُ عليهِ و سلمَ فأخبرَه فقال إنَّ -الدالَ على الخيرِ كفاعلِه- يرجى نشر القناة تكرما منكم https://t.me/BKBW99
❤2👍2
محمد بن شمس الشرك مجددا على نهج الأزارقة والحرورية والفلاسفة يكفر بمجرد اللوازم والمآلات ألا مبينة -دون التزامها- سأله أحدهم ما مناط كفر منكر صفات الله؟ فقال له: إنكاره شيئا ورد في القرآن، وأصاب ولم يكتفِ، بل أراد التعالم والإطناب، فما لبثِ أن لجب لجباً عظيما، فالتزم عين مذهب الحرورية، والفلاسفة فكفرهم بلازم قولهم ألا وهو -إثبات النقص لله- دون قولهم ومما أجمع عليه أهل الإسلام قاطبة سلفا وخلفا أن التكفير بالإلزام، …
👍12❤1👎1
محمد بن شمس الشرك مجددا على نهج الأزارقة والحرورية والفلاسفة يكفر بمجرد اللوازم والمآلات ألا مبينة -دون التزامها- ... يتبع ⬇️
👍2
Sticker, posted without a caption
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم والصلاة والسلام على من شد الله ببيانه أطناب الإيمان، ورد بستانه أهل الشرك والطغيان وبعد: يكاد يجمع كل من انتسب إلى الإسلام، واستقبل قبلة الحنفاء، وكان من أهل العلم والإبصارِ أن ما من مسلك يسهل على الشيطان نفث البدع والضلالات في قلوب عباد الرحمن أكثر من مسلك جهل المبتدع بلغة العرب، فكيف إذا كان المبتدع كابن شمس لا يجعل لغة العرب على فوت منه فحسب، بل هو أمي بالمعنى الفقهي، أي أن قراءته للفاتحة …
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BKBW99. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 554,806 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@BKBW99 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أبو بكر الموحد الباكستاني-٢” (@BKBW99), 193 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BKBW99.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.