Channel
@BJDichter
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
36subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001355509815 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BJDichter |
| Description | Co-founder - http://possiblycorrect.com #FreeSpeech #Freedom #Bitcoin Pronouns: Sire / His Royal Majesty #Based Spokesperson #FreedomConvoyCanada |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BJDichter |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 36 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:32 | 36 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 February 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 February 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
17 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 9 | 52.9% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 47.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 February 2022 to 23 February 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
It is important for Canadians right now to remember that other people's rights are your rights. You cannot sacrifice the rights and freedoms of someone else without giving up your own rights and freedom. @BJDichter
👍3❤2
How will history judge what happened on February 19 2022? Was this in the spirit of Family Day long weekend. #FreedomConvoyCanada2022 #TruckersForFreedom2022 https://nationalpost.com/opinion/adam-zivo-trudeaus-use-of-the-emergencies-act-violates-the-rights-of-canadians @BJDichter
Not good. Even the appearance of impartiality no longer matters. The judge has a clear moral duty to recuse herself. @BJDichter
FLASHBACK: Justin Trudeau expresses support for Julie Bourgeois, failed Liberal candidate, in 2011. Bourgeois, a judge, just denied Freedom Convoy organizer Tamara Lich bail. @BJDichter
A New Hope. 🚙🚛🚛🚚🚚🚒🚛🚛#freedom #FreedomConvoy #TruckerConvoy2022 @BJDichter
The Canadian Convoy for freedom put out a “Road Map to Freedom.” It has 7 points: 1) End vax mandates 2) Cancel local vax mandates 3) end state of emergencies 4) give people their jobs back 5) give kids back to their parents 6) more small business support 7) respect freedom of choice. @BJDichter
❤3👍3
Truckers Call On Patriots To Take Their Money Out Of The Banks In Response To Trudeau's Power Grab I think this is a great idea, if the tyrants can just freeze your account and take your money anyhow, without any due process, then it's time to come together and initiate a run on the banks. Watch how fast they'll cave. They started this, so let's finish it. @BJDichter
Remember when #Trudeua talks about empathy? Where is the empathy now? #TruckersForFreedom2022 #FreedomConvoyCanada2022 Douglas Murray: Justin Trudeau should fall over handling of Canadian tru... @BJDichter
@BJDichter
So many memories in such a short period of time. #Peace #Love #Unity #Freedom We love you all. No matter what happens, all of you have helped make the world a slightly better place. #TruckersForFreedom #FreedomConvoy #FreedomConvoyCanada2022 @BJDichter
❤2
#Peace #Live #Freedom #Love the French are free. Now it’s time for the rest of the country to rediscover #Freedom. #TruckersFrom #FreedomConvoyCanada2022 @BJDichter
Convoy spokesperson @BJdichter delivered a statement on @ jordanbpeterson's podcast clearly and calmly laying out what the convoy is actually seeking to change – and how they want to do it. https://tnc.news/2022/02/16/what-the-trucker-convoy-protesters-want-in-their-own-words/
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BJDichter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 989,935 of 1,603,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“B J Dichter” (@BJDichter), 36 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BJDichter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.