Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 53279116036124414676custom 53258827383712214825custom 53260201902095976145custom 53754635101237605865

Channel
@BIZHAKU
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
10subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002322227535 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BIZHAKU |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 8 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BIZHAKU |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 10 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 10 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 8 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
180 reactions across 7 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5326020190209597614 | 27 | 15.0% | |
| custom 5222356086459227243 | 21 | 11.7% | |
| custom 5325882738371221482 | 21 | 11.7% | |
| custom 5328227696025558979 | 21 | 11.7% | |
| custom 5327911603612441467 | 20 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5222336028961959935 | 18 | 10.0% | |
| custom 5375463510123760586 | 18 | 10.0% | |
| custom 5327798650267523047 | 14 | 7.78% | |
| custom 5249067080778539311 | 10 | 5.56% | |
| custom 5395380643569886368 | 10 | 5.56% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 180reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 8 March 2025 to 9 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @BIZHAKU. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 March 2025 to 9 March 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 53279116036124414676custom 53258827383712214825custom 53260201902095976145custom 53754635101237605865
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 53277986502675230474custom 53282276960255589794custom 52223560864592272433custom 52490670807785393113custom 53260201902095976143custom 53279116036124414673custom 53754635101237605863custom 53258827383712214822
✅если оформление вашего профиля нам не нравится заявки будут отклонены.
custom 52223360289619599356custom 53258827383712214824custom 53260201902095976144custom 53279116036124414674custom 53282276960255589794custom 52223560864592272433custom 53754635101237605863custom 53953806435698863683
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 52223360289619599354custom 52223560864592272434custom 53258827383712214824custom 53260201902095976144custom 53277986502675230473custom 53282276960255589793
так отсоси у моих демонов. только не спеши,становись в очередь. 😈DEMON - HAKUGAN. information 💬 boost 💬 patent.
custom 52223360289619599354custom 53277986502675230474custom 53279116036124414674custom 53754635101237605864custom 53953806435698863684custom 52223560864592272433custom 52490670807785393113custom 53260201902095976143
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 52223360289619599354custom 52223560864592272434custom 52490670807785393114custom 53260201902095976144custom 53258827383712214823custom 53282276960255589793
😀с сегодняшнего дня мы объявляем,что названия “Hakugan” принадлежат нам. дата создания патента: 11.11.2024.
custom 52223560864592272434custom 53260201902095976144custom 53282276960255589794custom 53258827383712214823custom 53277986502675230473custom 53279116036124414673custom 53754635101237605863custom 53953806435698863683
Sticker, posted without a caption
Channel photo removed
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @BIZHAKU. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,207,511 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@BIZHAKU named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HAKUGAN” (@BIZHAKU), 10 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BIZHAKU.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.