📖 Пересказ первой серии https://300.ya.ru/v_Sleq3meT 📖Пересказ второй, читать правда скучно, там демонстрируются навыки работы в блокноте аххаха https://300.ya.ru/v_IoCNnCkj AFC, би-модель и много другое :)))
✍1

Channel
@BIMSisters
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
524subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002601864594 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BIMSisters |
| Description | Среда, где профессионализм ценится выше стереотипов, а солидарность становится основой для прорывных решений bimsisters.ru Чат https://t.me/BIMSisters_comments Канал основан и ведётся @AGolovaneva. Совместно с @NastenkaBimCake |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BIMSisters |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 524 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:25 | 524 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 4 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
240 reactions across 15 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 100 | 41.7% | |
| 🔥 | 31 | 12.9% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 9.17% | |
| custom 5882131357399782358 | 21 | 8.75% | |
| ❤🔥 | 21 | 8.75% | |
| custom 5881828751183975713 | 15 | 6.25% | |
| ✍ | 11 | 4.58% | |
| custom 5416099467021536210 | 4 | 1.67% | |
| 🌚 | 4 | 1.67% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 1.67% | |
| 💅 | 2 | 0.833% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.833% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.417% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.417% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.417% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 240reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 4 January 2026 to 24 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @BIMSisters. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 January 2026 to 24 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📖 Пересказ первой серии https://300.ya.ru/v_Sleq3meT 📖Пересказ второй, читать правда скучно, там демонстрируются навыки работы в блокноте аххаха https://300.ya.ru/v_IoCNnCkj AFC, би-модель и много другое :)))
✍1
Серия 2 наших увлекательных короткометражек Ошибки маппинга (или нет) [Баг BIM Vision] — 11 мин 🎥ВК | YouTube Из ролика вы узнаете, как разоблачить баги BIM-вьюверов и найти истину в IFC ⏩ Паника в чате и «двоящиеся» параметры ⏩ Парадокс BIMVision: Самый популярный и самый неудобный? ⏩ Метод «Второго мнения» ⏩ NotePad++ как базовый минимум для работы BIM-специалиста ⏩ Анатомия IFC-связей Пробуем стать вместе …
❤5🔥2❤🔥1👍1
🦾 ДГП выкатили канал. Мы - таблицу, чтобы быстро ориентироваться Если вы осмысляете маппинг, то на примере требований ДГП вы можете увидеть как может разрабатываться рабочая таблица. Я собрала её, чтобы можно было не читать всё подряд, а сразу видеть: что с чем сопоставляется и куда это вообще должно попадать. Мне нравится, когда требования можно разложить, как мини-базу данных, поэтому делюсь, ловите ссылку: Требо…
✍5❤3🔥3❤🔥1🤝1
Как вы понимаете значение "Высота" у колонны?🏛
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
📼 Вышло первое видео из нашей новой серии про требования к ЦИМ АГР Начинаем разбираться, что именно теперь требуют на стадии АГР в Москве, что такое IFC 4 Reference View и почему недостаточно просто нажать «Экспорт IFC» в Revit, надеясь, что дальше оно как-нибудь само. Если вы уже слышали фразу «нужно сдать IFC», но пока не очень понимаете, что именно от вас хотят, это видео для вас. Дальше будем разбирать настрой…
❤13❤🔥2custom 58821313573997823582✍1🔥1custom 58818287511839757131
🤩 Новым открытым знаниям быть! Когда ведёшь блог, иногда возникает внутренний конфликт: Ты видишь ситуацию ⚪️ Пытаешься её осмыслить ⚪️ Но понимаешь, что любая оценка - это лишь одна сторона медали ⚪️ Есть люди, есть отношения, есть профессия и репутация ⚪️ А действительно ли всё так, как я вижу? ⚪️ Да и вообще, у каждого своя правда И неважно, ведете вы блог или нет. Это сплошь и рядом в обычной жизни. Со времен…
❤14🔥4🎉3
Скучали?)
custom 58821313573997823585💅2❤1custom 58818287511839757131
Кто ты по жизни документам и кто в реальности? Люди в сфере BIM продолжают называться так, как привыкли. Одна и та же должность может под собой подразумевать различный набор задач. Теперь открываем профстандарт. И видим в первую очередь не мастеров, координаторов, менеджеров с различными сокращениями, а уровни ответственности от A до E. Получается, рынок живет быстрее профстандарта, а профстандарт вообще живёт своей…
❤12✍4custom 54160994670215362104🔥3🌚1👍1
Как в вашей трудовой книжке называется ваша BIM-должность? Есть мысль для нового поста. Но сначала интересно посмотреть на реальность.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍2
«Требования к ЦИМ АГР»: как BIM незаметно стал юридическим документом Если вы думали, что IFC – это про координацию, у меня для вас новости. 😟 *тяжёлый вздох* С 2 апреля 2026 в Москве вступают в силу новые требования, которые несколько переворачивают обычную процедуру согласования архитектурно-градостроительных решений (АГР). Столица уделяет большое внимание архитектурному облику, включающему фасады, колористику, …
👍8🔥3
12 февраля 2026 года в Новосибирске, в рамках Сибирской строительной недели, состоится BIM DAY 2026 — профессиональная конференция для тех, кто работает с BIM не на уровне лозунгов, а в реальных проектах. BIM — это больше, чем технология. Это частное проявление глобальной цифровой трансформации архитектурно-строительной отрасли. Практика показывает: попытки просто «надстроить BIM» над традиционными процессами редко…
❤4👍2
Эскапизм в BIM: бегство или способ не разочароваться в профессии? 🧐 Поводом поста стала фраза Вы, «эксперт», вместо того, чтобы засучить рукава и спасать отрасль, устраиваете хипстерские «BIM-завтраки» и играете в настолки В этой фразе прекрасно всё. Раздражение. Презрение. И очень конкретный страх. 🥼Сразу обозначу: я не о «один я умный в белом пальто стою красивый». Хочу поднять диалог, какими разными способами м…
❤16❤🔥3🌚2💯2custom 58818287511839757132custom 58821313573997823582🔥1🗿1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @BIMSisters. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как вы понимаете значение "Высота" у колонны?🏛
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Как в вашей трудовой книжке называется ваша BIM-должность? Есть мысль для нового поста. Но сначала интересно посмотреть на реальность.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 4 January 2026 to 24 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,076,703 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BIM Sisters” (@BIMSisters), 524 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BIMSisters.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.