Channel
@BHCDD1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
62subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003826730820 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BHCDD1 |
| Created | 12 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BHCDD1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 62 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 63 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 63 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (12 June 2026 – 28 July 2026) |
| Views total | 90 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 03:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
15 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 53.3% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 26.7% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 13.3% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 6.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📣冰花数据号📣 🔥今日正式进入挂圈和数据号圈，希望各位多多包涵，也希望各位多多支持一下冰花，我会用实际的行动和真实的自己给各位服务以及我们数据号质量和划算的价格会倾向于谁都买得起，玩得起数据号🔥 ✅不进行夸张宣传是风范，不抬价格是良心，不做无良是本分，售后到位是真诚✅ 👈在此邀请各位加入我的频道👈 🌟 官方频道 🌟 🌟 官方频道 🌟 🌟 官方频道 🌟 🌟 官方频道 🌟🌟 官方频道 🌟 🌟 官方频道 🌟
❤1👍1
🥰冰红茶最新自动抓号器2.0版本发布🥰 ❤️最新2.0版本，加入防卡二维码以及扫码提示❤️ ⭐功能和UI和以前一样，过滤模式支持100线程最快过滤⭐ 抓号模式内置了全部游戏 使用简单 😇🙃😉 @BHCDD1 https://t.me/BHCDD1 https://t.me/BHCDD1 https://t.me/BHCDD1 https://t.me/BHCDD1
❤2
等会发布新的抓号器2.0
🤩2
回来了
我想要不要我们更新刷黑屋脚本或者修仙脚本呢
🔥4
明天发布2.0，和以前一样，只不过准备加点东西，可能只有root的人可用有效果那个功能
以后此频道为唯一通知频道
🐊一直保持以前的UI，不是因为好看，而是因为不忘初心🐊
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
❤️时隔多年没有给各位更新过滤器和自动抓号器了，今天创建此频道是为了接着回来更新和公益，保持之前的慈善家，所有项目都没有任何收费，感谢各位的陪伴，也许你认识我，但是现在今非昔比，市面上凭空出现很多抓号器，导致我没办法接着给各位更新，以后会接着做下去❤️
❤1
Channel created
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @BHCDD1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 684,088 of 1,550,472entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“冰红茶╰︶﹉๑ ๑﹉︶╯” (@BHCDD1), 62 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BHCDD1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.