Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GDD数据号

Channel

GDD数据号

@BHCNB7

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

8,726subscribers

-170 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002237130723
TypeChannel
Username@BHCNB7
Description
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/BHCNB7

Growth

8,7268,8968,8117 August 2026 — 8,896 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,893 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,819 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,780 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,726 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -170. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,701–8,922 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 15:248,726-54
14 Aug 2026, 07:558,780-39
11 Aug 2026, 10:128,819-74
7 Aug 2026, 23:288,893-3
7 Aug 2026, 11:338,896first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.56%
avg views ÷ 8,726 subscribers
Avg views / post
311
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.567%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held20 (14 June 202613 August 2026)
Views total2,484
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
41
Videos
7
Links
30

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 17s
Average length
1m 17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

22 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1359.1%
👍836.4%
🤔14.55%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC53 views1 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃 😂全网唯一一款云控和平全自动验号脚本公益了———JO公益😂 📣📣目前已经做了好几个赛季了,长期稳定,无任何卡点,验号速度全网最快,支持过滤所有问题,目前测试1w个号适配了和平全部弹窗,只为给号商一个家 ✅和平数据号圈迎来了新时代,使用此脚本测试验出来的号基本上都没有问题,80%验好直接上卡网即可,网页控制脚本和添加需要验的号,网页一键操作,验好后也是网页导出即可✅ 🌟🌟目前支持各大云机,打压和平数据号圈市场,不用人工手动验号了🌟🌟 ⚠️速度加入频道获取脚本⚠️ https://t.me/JOJB91 https://t.me/JOJB91 https://t.me/JOJB91

1

31 Jul 2026, 14:26 UTC214 views1 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

全网避雷7S数据号,供货商钱都能圈,还是人?这种cs都不知道卡网是什么垃圾号,供货商都圈看来卡网也好不到哪去,一个号供货才1.8,硬是圈了别人300来块钱的

1

31 Jul 2026, 07:27 UTC210 views1 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

📣冰花数据号📣 🔥今日正式进入挂圈和数据号圈,希望各位多多包涵,也希望各位多多支持一下冰花,我会用实际的行动和真实的自己给各位服务以及我们数据号质量和划算的价格会倾向于谁都买得起,玩得起数据号🔥 ✅不进行夸张宣传是风范,不抬价格是良心,不做无良是本分,售后到位是真诚✅ 👈在此邀请各位加入我的频道👈 🌟 官方频道 🌟 🌟 官方频道 🌟 🌟 官方频道 🌟 🌟 官方频道 🌟🌟 官方频道 🌟 🌟 官方频道 🌟

1

28 Jul 2026, 06:13 UTC231 views2 reactionsread 18 August 2026

各位号商,有王者号的可以卖我,我这边大量收,脚本自动验,正常多少给各位结算多少 @DENDH1

2

25 Jul 2026, 18:11 UTC≈1,010 views1 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃😃 😂全网唯一一款云控和平全自动验号脚本公益了———JO公益😂 📣📣目前已经做了好几个赛季了,长期稳定,无任何卡点,验号速度全网最快,支持过滤所有问题,目前测试1w个号适配了和平全部弹窗,只为给号商一个家 ✅和平数据号圈迎来了新时代,使用此脚本测试验出来的号基本上都没有问题,80%验好直接上卡网即可,网页控制脚本和添加需要验的号,网页一键操作,验好后也是网页导出即可✅ 🌟🌟目前支持各大云机,打压和平数据号圈市场,不用人工手动验号了🌟🌟 ⚠️速度加入频道获取脚本⚠️ https://t.me/JOJB91 https://t.me/JOJB91 https://t.me/JOJB91

1

22 Jul 2026, 09:28 UTC302 views6 reactionsread 18 August 2026

免费定制上号器三合一,过滤器等 @BHCZZ2

3👍2🤔1

21 Jul 2026, 08:05 UTC271 views1 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @BHCDD1File

🥰冰红茶最新自动抓号器2.0版本发布🥰 ❤️最新2.0版本,加入防卡二维码以及扫码提示❤️ ⭐功能和UI和以前一样,过滤模式支持100线程最快过滤⭐ 抓号模式内置了全部游戏 使用简单 😇🙃😉 @BHCDD1 https://t.me/BHCDD1 https://t.me/BHCDD1 https://t.me/BHCDD1 https://t.me/BHCDD1

1

2 Jul 2026, 02:30 UTC505 views3 reactionsread 18 August 2026

借个快手号 发的作品内容是和平精英打地铁的视频 必须要有热度 这两个月给你1000-3000 有意的d 只发和平游戏的 无违规 只要一个 联系 @gddyyds

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BHCNB7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,044,907 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GDD数据号” (@BHCNB7), 8,726 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BHCNB7.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.