Photo, posted without a caption
custom 53395709795321878502

Channel
@BFG_operator
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
138subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002243620568 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BFG_operator |
| Description | Все мемы выдуманы. Совпадения с реальностью случайны. Возможен плагиат. Нам просто необходимы ваши голоса, неизвестно для чего, но необходимы - https://t.me/boost/BFG_operator |
| Created | Between 1 May 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BFG_operator |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 138 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 138 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
43 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5832702502935465153 | 10 | 23.3% | |
| custom 5339570979532187850 | 8 | 18.6% | |
| custom 5920515596088250243 | 8 | 18.6% | |
| custom 5319240365289513270 | 7 | 16.3% | |
| custom 5255991319678952902 | 5 | 11.6% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 11.6% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 February 2026 to 17 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 53395709795321878502
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 53192403652895132702
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
💯2custom 53192403652895132701custom 53395709795321878501
Photo, posted without a caption
Я напиздел, завтра, сегодня лень
custom 58327025029354651532
Ребят, знаете шо, у меня в запасах всего 100 мемов И мне жалко вам их давать, не потому что я жадный, а потому что просто лень искать новые (к тому же они все хуйня) И каждый раз пощщя(?) мемы, я обрекаю себя на поиск новых, пздц А я то ленивый вообще-то Если будут силы (моральные) то я фотки с кубы скину сегодня ((я же не кидал их?)) Крч гуд ивнинг, епта
custom 53192403652895132702custom 58327025029354651532custom 52559913196789529021
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 52559913196789529021custom 58327025029354651531custom 59205155960882502431
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @BFG_operator. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,050,761 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“BFG оператор🦤” (@BFG_operator), 138 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BFG_operator.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.