#曝光 531.com 杀猪盘,平拉PP爆奖只退最后一笔充值的本金 事件经过:接上贴【 PP哈迪斯爆13万 】,冲17000平拉20块爆奖,提款被扣除找客服说不支持此玩法。平拉PP都不让玩?是赢了不让玩吧,输了就没事呗? 拆解:前有【 8G.com全网特邀5水同等充值 】,后有【 天富假钱包假押 】杀四方。赢了不出比输完还难受。 相关贴【 警惕特邀盗相册套路 】 ✅天才电子频道:@TV777 🧑🏻💻投稿爆奖视频:@YP777

Channel
天才电子选手
@BC220
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
9,907subscribers
+618 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001792099382 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @BC220 @TV777 |
| Description | 频道更新类别( 点蓝色字体查看 ) #热点 #实用 #VPN #老哥 #曝光 电子类别 #NC #钢锯 #PG #PP 💸投稿采纳奖励8.8U,不限平台 一,需视频与真实出入款记录 二,描述游玩/爆奖过程 三,订阅本频道与加入 @AG226 🧑🏻💻投稿客服: @YP777 请您直抒来意,节约双方时间 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BC220 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:44 | 9,907 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 9,908 | +157 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 9,751 | no change |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 9,751 | +127 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 9,624 | +10 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 9,614 | +85 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 9,529 | +8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:52 | 9,521 | +120 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:51 | 9,401 | +11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 9,390 | +76 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:06 | 9,314 | +24 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:40 | 9,290 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 9,289 | first reading |
Engagement
101 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 21.8%
- avg views ÷ 9,907 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,160
- 101 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.122%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 101
- of 101 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 83 of 101 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 101 (3 August 2026 – 23 August 2026) |
| Views total | 218,470 |
| Reactions total | 209 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 383
- Videos
- 986
- Links
- 876
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1h 25m
- Average length
- 1m 02s
Measured directly from 82 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
209 reactions across 72 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 108 | 51.7% | |
| 👍 | 71 | 34.0% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 7.18% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 2.87% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 1.44% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.957% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 0.957% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.478% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.478% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 83 of the 101 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 209reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 101 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 165
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 34
- of 101 we hold a reading for · 34%
- Most on one post
- 17
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @BC220. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 101 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 23 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
#PP电子投稿 #宙斯哈迪斯 探花 #老哥 好消息是爆了,坏消息是被黑了。冲17000爆13万平台客服直接扣除盈利说不支持此玩法..就退了5000最后一笔充值 时间:2026-08-23 货币:CNY 基础投注:20 获奖金额:¥135680(6784X) 厂商:Pragmatic Play (务时游戏) 游戏名:Zeus vs Hades: Gods of War 相关贴【 新币陷入混币丑闻 】 ✅天才电子频道:@TV777 🧑🏻💻投稿爆奖视频:@YP777 注:投稿采用奖励最低8.8U
#回形针游戏 #酒馆掉落 爆脾气 #老哥 MD,没钱的时候那么容易出满杯?就20多U的反水,前面百家乐挂逼没领的,结果出满杯了,操 时间:2026-08-23 货币:PHP 基础投注:1 盈利金额:10000(≈1100人民币)(1万X) 厂商:Paperclip Gaming (回形针) 游戏名:Tavern Drop 相关贴【 PP游戏:甜蜜狂潮 】 ✅天才电子频道:@TV777 🧑🏻💻投稿爆奖视频:@YP777 注:投稿采用奖励最低8.8U
#殊死一决 #福利贴 (第27期)🎁抽评论10人获得66积分(6.6U)积分,但需与管理决斗骰子,最低198积分兑换现金,每晚8:00开奖 上期抽奖结果公示 : 陈平安 ☠️ 火麟飞 ✅ 爱阴斯坦 ☠️ 花海 ☠️ 發⁶⁶⁶ ☠️ 慢半拍 ☠️ 名称带群号不可参与 抽中24H内领取,超时作废 广告赞助商: W.CC 【 抽奖公平性与规则 】 ✅天才电子频道:@TV777 🧑🏻💻投稿爆奖视频:@YP777
❤3👍1
🏆#NC游戏 #蛮力 忽忽 #老哥 额,都以为空转,直接来了个外星人锁定3口就满倍美滋滋,算下来才2U不到的免费炸那么多 时间:2026-8-22 货币:ARS 底注:80 (加成:2560) 盈利金额:640万(≈29000人民币)(8万X) 厂商:Nolimit City (无限城市) 游戏名:Brute Force: Alien Onslaught 相关贴【 钢锯游戏:迈阿密风云】 ✅天才电子频道:@TV777 🧑🏻💻投稿爆奖视频:@YP777 注:投稿采用奖励最低8.8U
❤2👍2
#热点新闻 #虚拟货币 狗庄控盘砸盘,爆仓无数赌狗 事件:8月22下午1点半,加密货币圈的SOL、ZEC、ETH等币同一时间,同一点瞬时下跌超5%,其中ETH以开盘2514U/枚暴跌至2384U/枚,击碎赌狗幻梦! 解析:从【 牛来MEME币暴涨 】就可以看出这世界多癫,明知庄家想干死你,还要入场。 相关贴【 币圈赌狗130万换周边 】 ✅天才电子频道:@TV777 🧑🏻💻投稿爆奖视频:@YP777 注:投稿采用奖励最低8.8U
#FC电子投稿 #老哥 李金 #老哥 挂逼最后的34U冲进去梭哈,给爆了个从没玩过的游戏,提款1100U 发生时间:2026-8-22 货币:USD 基础投注:0.3 获奖金额:$1064(3549X ) 厂商:FC(发财电子) 游戏名:帝国竞技场 相关贴【 超玩系列:艺妓之刃 】 ✅天才电子频道:@TV777 🧑🏻💻投稿爆奖视频:@YP777 注:投稿采用奖励最低8.8U
#PP电子投稿 #奥林匹斯 匿名 #老哥 120块钱买的免费爆一万八,开局就炸770倍,这对吗?这不对。为啥别人能爆我们爆不出来?MAXWIN不存在了。(三体,有人看过吗) 时间:2026-08-22 货币:CNY 基础投注:1.2 获奖金额:18000(15000X) 厂商:Pragmatic Play (务时游戏) 游戏名:Gates of Olympus Super Scatter 相关贴【 EVO:百家乐起飞连胜 】 ✅天才电子频道:@TV777 🧑🏻💻投稿爆奖视频:@YP777 注:投稿采用奖励最低8.8U
❤2
#殊死一决 #福利贴 (第26期)🎁抽评论10人获得66积分(6.6U)积分,但需与管理决斗骰子,最低198积分兑换现金,每晚8:00开奖 上期抽奖结果公示 : 无双 ☠️ 欧尼酱 ☠️ 吧啦啦 ☠️ 躺下哥 ☠️ 迎江 ☠️ 天才少女 ✅ 心心 ☠️ 名称带群号不可参与 抽中24H内领取,超时作废 广告赞助商: W.CC 【 抽奖公平性与规则 】 ✅天才电子频道:@TV777 🧑🏻💻投稿爆奖视频:@YP777
👍4❤3
#百家乐 8月20日晚的直播回放,第一口8输9就不该再玩。为什么百家乐总是能发出来这么恶心的牌?我拿9的时候怎么不发公了? 时间:2026-08-21 货币:ARS 基础投注:300万(≈13000人民币) 总亏损金额:¥26000 厂商:Evolution Gaming (进化) 游戏名:快速百家乐 相关贴【 超玩系列:麻将连胜3 】 ✅天才电子频道:@TV777 🧑🏻💻投稿爆奖视频:@YP777 注:投稿采用奖励最低8.8U
👍2
🏆#NC游戏 #被水手浸湿 白马 #老哥 1000U本金打到11000U没提(提本金+132U抽奖)后输完,畜生的PP老头,该死的EVO百家乐,都该死 时间:2026-8-21 货币:ARS 底注:320 (加成:8万) 盈利金额:960万(≈43100人民币)(3万X) 厂商:Nolimit City (无限城市) 游戏名:Soaked By Seamen 相关贴【 终端游戏:兵变 】 ✅天才电子频道:@TV777 🧑🏻💻投稿爆奖视频:@YP777 注:投稿采用奖励最低8.8U
👍2❤1
#曝光 买赌博账户被骗,心软成弱点 事件经过:相识(朋友结束进群,交流,发图,立人设)。相交(有事没事就私聊,隐晦提借钱)。被骗(购买他赌博账户,付款1030U后被找回) 电报: @hk8578666 UID : 7958983248 交易: stake账号 hk1788888 邮箱: [email protected] 证据:【 点此查看 】 拆解:你都好意思问我借钱,我肯定好意思拒绝。借钱或交易都需谨慎! ✅天才电子频道:@TV777 🧑🏻💻投稿爆奖视频:@YP777
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 101 posts we hold for @BC220. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@BC220 edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 15 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 21 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,049,026 of 1,584,486entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“天才电子选手” (@BC220), 9,907 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BC220.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.