⭕️Через 30 минут начинаем мастер-класс по кинезиотейпированию🔥 Занимайте места⬇️ https://bbalance.ru/pl/webinar/show?id=3310619&view=1
❤1👌1👍1

Channel
@BBALANCE_OFFICIAL
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,286subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001526885517 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BBALANCE_OFFICIAL |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BBALANCE_OFFICIAL |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 1,286 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:23 | 1,285 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 1,286 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 1,285 | +2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 1,283 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 1,284 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 1,285 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:53 | 1,285 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (24 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,212 |
| Reactions total | 54 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
74 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 33 | 44.6% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 28.4% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 18.9% | |
| 👌 | 3 | 4.05% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 1.35% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.35% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⭕️Через 30 минут начинаем мастер-класс по кинезиотейпированию🔥 Занимайте места⬇️ https://bbalance.ru/pl/webinar/show?id=3310619&view=1
❤1👌1👍1
На первый взгляд кажется, что все выполнено правильно. Но здесь есть важный нюанс, который нельзя игнорировать ☝️. Правильный ответ — тейп проходит прямо через область щитовидной железы. Если щитовидная железа здорова, такая аппликация, скорее всего, не причинит вреда. Но проблема в том, что многие люди могут не знать о скрытых нарушениях ее функции. В этом случае дополнительное механическое воздействие на область …
❤1👍1💯1
Photo, posted without a caption
Что не так с этой аппликацией?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1👀1👍1
БЕСПЛАТНЫЙ МАСТЕР-КЛАСС УЖЕ В ЗАВТРА! 🚀 Хотите понять, как тейпы реально работают?😀 Приходите на «Знакомство с кинезиотейпированием» от BBalance. 👩🏫 Ведут эксперты: Сания Абдрахманова и Ольга Лазарева. Разберем три ключевые темы: ➡️ Диагноз — это основа для подбора схемы аппликации? ➡️ Как поддержать колено при травме мениска? ➡️ Боль в шее: что делать и как за 5 минут подобрать схему аппликации для купирования …
❤2👍1🔥1
Сравним характеристики серии BB FACE TAPE – из искусственного шелка (вискозы)🦋 и органического хлопка🌱. В чем разница, и какой вариант лучше выбрать на лето? В жару хочется, чтобы уход был не только эффективным, но и максимально комфортным. На самом деле, подойдут оба варианта, разница лишь в особенностях материала и ваших личных предпочтениях. ✨ BB FACE TAPЕ SILK – это шелковые тейпы, которые имеют ряд преимущест…
❤2🔥2👍1
Многие начинают с эстетического тейпирования… и остаются с тейпами надолго 💛 Для многих женщин знакомство с тейпированием начинается именно с желания сохранить красоту: 🪷уменьшить отечность, 🪷поддержать четкий овал лица, 🪷 сгладить морщинки, 🪷сделать уход за собой более естественным. Но чем больше узнаешь о возможностях тейпов, тем чаще начинаешь использовать их не только для эстетики. Поддержка мышц после нагрузо…
❤2👍2🔥1
bbtape | КИНЕЗИО ТЕЙПЫ КОРЕЯ | ОФИЦИАЛЬНЫЙ КАНАЛ pinned a video
Анонс мероприятий на август Друзья, последний летний месяц! 🔥Мы отказываемся верить, что время проносится так быстро! Нужно успеть наполнить август интересными событиями, полезными знакомствами, новыми знаниями. Поэтому приглашаем на семинары и мастер-классы Учебного центра BBALANCE🔽🔽🔽. Регистрация по ссылкам, заранее бронируйте свои места. 📍 15–16 августа · Нижний Новгород «Тейпирование в реабилитации», базовый …
❤4👍2🔥2
Китайский тейп с маркетплейса 🆚 тейп BBalance Клиентка BBalance прислала нам короткий видео отзыв. Она решила сэкономить и приобрела рулон китайского тейпа на маркетплейсе. Разница на лицо – показываем на следующих слайдах. 1️⃣ Растяжение тейпа. ✔️У качественного кинезиотейпа растяжение происходит вдоль ленты, а поперек он практически не тянется. Именно это позволяет выполнять аппликации с нужным процентом натяже…
❤2👍1🔥1
📽️Запись сегодняшнего прямого эфира с Санией Абдрахмановой готова✅ Посмотреть можно по ссылке в ВК⬇️ https://vkvideo.ru/live-105528592_456241237
❤2👌1👍1
🔔Сегодня 31 июля в 12.00 по МСК приглашаем Вас на бесплатный прямой эфир с Санией Абдрахмановой — преподавателем BBalance, реабилитологом и специалистом по эстетическому тейпированию. 🔝Тема эфира: «Профилактика образования глубоких морщин на лице» Если Вы работаете с лицом самостоятельно или помогаете своим клиентам сохранять молодость и красоту естественными методами, этот эфир будет для Вас полезен. 🔵Эфир пройд…
❤2👍1👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @BBALANCE_OFFICIAL. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что не так с этой аппликацией?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“bbtape | КИНЕЗИО ТЕЙПЫ КОРЕЯ | ОФИЦИАЛЬНЫЙ КАНАЛ” (@BBALANCE_OFFICIAL), 1,286 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BBALANCE_OFFICIAL.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.