Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ПРОЕКТ БАРС

Channel

ПРОЕКТ БАРС

@BARS011

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

30,142subscribers

+161 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001583312649
TypeChannel
Username@BARS011
DescriptionЧат: https://t.me/+WkqTaKQH6dFhZTdi ❎Ресурс включён в перечень Роскомнадзора. https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=6737a0c7772bb113f529af3b&registryType=bloggersPermission
Created21 October 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/BARS011

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 6 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@ru2ch/1758119 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC@BARS011/42518 · this entry9 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC1.003 minutes
@ru2ch/17880623 Sept 2026, 17:15 UTC@BARS011/43587 · this entry23 Sept 2026, 17:19 UTC1.005 minutes
@ru2ch/18028016 Oct 2026, 07:29 UTC@BARS011/44171 · this entry16 Oct 2026, 07:35 UTC1.006 minutes
@ru2ch/18035217 Oct 2026, 08:06 UTC@BARS011/44198 · this entry17 Oct 2026, 08:23 UTC1.0017 minutes
@ru2ch/18059320 Oct 2026, 17:00 UTC@BARS011/44320 · this entry20 Oct 2026, 17:05 UTC1.005 minutes
@ru2ch/18059520 Oct 2026, 17:28 UTC@BARS011/44324 · this entry20 Oct 2026, 17:28 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@ru2ch13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.007 minutes@ru2ch (13–0)
@Tapor_news12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0034 minutesthis entry (10–2)
@uzelsv7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0082 minutesthis entry (6–1)
@slavaded13376 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.997 minutes@slavaded1337 (4–2)
@mash5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.008 minutes@mash (5–0)
@klubniy_servis15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.005 minutes@klubniy_servis (15–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 28 of the 28 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 592 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

29,84830,15029,99930,1426 August 20269 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 96 days, net +161. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,803–30,195 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 23:5930,142-8
8 Nov 2026, 12:0130,150+5
7 Nov 2026, 07:3830,145+4
6 Nov 2026, 08:3630,141-8
5 Nov 2026, 11:1830,149+11
4 Nov 2026, 08:3030,138+59
3 Nov 2026, 06:2830,079+22
2 Nov 2026, 09:3630,057+33
1 Nov 2026, 12:5030,024-14
31 Oct 2026, 12:5630,038+12
30 Oct 2026, 11:3530,026+11
29 Oct 2026, 09:4930,015+46
28 Oct 2026, 09:4029,969-12
27 Oct 2026, 06:4829,981+2
26 Oct 2026, 07:4829,979-7
25 Oct 2026, 11:0529,986-2
24 Oct 2026, 10:3429,988-2
23 Oct 2026, 07:3029,990+4
22 Oct 2026, 09:2029,986+17
21 Oct 2026, 02:1729,969first reading

Engagement

1,690 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 161 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.1%
avg views ÷ 30,142 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,240
690 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
690
of 1,690 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 687 of 690 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held1,690 (5 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total2,928,990
Reactions total108,145
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 23:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈18,500
Videos
≈14,000
Links
≈1,930

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3h 31m
Average length
39s

Measured directly from 328 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

158,990 reactions across 996 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣37,79323.8%
💯24,90715.7%
😁22,56914.2%
🙏19,64112.4%
👍18,48411.6%
🔥14,9469.40%
🤯12,1297.63%
❤4,8343.04%
❤‍🔥1,4310.9%
👏1,3400.843%
👌7170.451%
🥰1660.104%
😘330.021%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 997 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 158,990 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 27 September 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 46 of 690 posts held from the last 30 days (6.67%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 20:45 UTC999 views39 reactionsread 10 November 2026

🟢 Ладно мы тоже люди, пошутили и хватит. Надо что то сжечь. Спите. Там кривой рог стал более прямым, свинья обиделась запулила кучу дронов. Утром будем радоваться и горевать. Все как всегда.

🔥19🙏15💯5

10 Nov 2026, 20:19 UTC≈1,320 views20 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

🤣20

10 Nov 2026, 20:19 UTC≈1,320 views15 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

💯10😁5

10 Nov 2026, 20:18 UTC≈1,310 views21 reactionsread 10 November 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🔥17😁4

10 Nov 2026, 20:18 UTC≈1,320 views14 reactionsread 10 November 2026

Наша онанимная песня!!! Онанический рок!!!

🤣12🔥2

10 Nov 2026, 20:06 UTC≈1,520 views41 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

🤣31❤6👍4

10 Nov 2026, 20:00 UTC≈1,620 views32 reactionsread 10 November 2026

Вообще крутая🤝🤝🤝🤝🤝

🔥25💯4❤3

10 Nov 2026, 19:58 UTC≈1,660 views55 reactionsread 10 November 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

👍35🔥17🙏2❤1

10 Nov 2026, 19:58 UTC≈1,630 views42 reactionsread 10 November 2026

Короче я сегодня задумался что пишут песни про всякую хуйню но нет песен про руку, хотя пять лет все трахают свои руки. И я решил написать песню про золотого который любит свою руку. И вот что вышло. Это первая твоя песня. Дарю тебе ее.

🤣40🤯2

10 Nov 2026, 18:07 UTC≈2,820 views128 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

🟢 Примерно таких типов мы видели когда лежали в дурке. Но говорят это танец, так вот танцуйте пока в лесополку не попали! Тихой вам ночи я ушел кусты шевелить.

🤣70👌30🔥13🙏11💯2👏1🤯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,690 posts we hold for @BARS011. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Oct 2026, 16:11 UTCAnonymous Poll361 voters

Кто сегодня заебался?

  1. Я47%
  2. Я48%
  3. Я сын маминой подруги.34%

The shares total 129%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 27 September 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПРОЕКТ БАРС” (@BARS011), 30,142 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BARS011.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.