آپدیت ترین چنلا اکسو رو چک کردی ؟ همشون یه جا باهم اینجان 🥂

Channel
𝖡𝖠𝖬𝖡I | 𝖯𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗍 𝖲𝗁𝗈𝗉
@BAMBI_sticker
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
92subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004372283417 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BAMBI_sticker |
| Description | ✦ 𝗪𝗘𝗟𝗖𝗢𝗠𝗘 𝗧𝗢 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗕𝗔𝗠𝗕𝗜 𝗦𝗧𝗜𝗖𝗞𝗘𝗥 𝗦𝗛𝗢𝗣 ✿◌ |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 7 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BAMBI_sticker |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 92 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 92 | +11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 81 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 154.3%
- avg views ÷ 92 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 142
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.66%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (7 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,845 |
| Reactions total | 53 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 12
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 6
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 6s
- Average length
- 6s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
53 reactions across 8 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 10 | 18.9% | |
| 🐳 | 9 | 17.0% | |
| 🍓 | 8 | 15.1% | |
| 🦄 | 6 | 11.3% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 9.43% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 7.55% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 7.55% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 5.66% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 3.77% | |
| ☃ | 1 | 1.89% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 1.89% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
♡ چانیول واقعا رفته دیت!! 𖹭 جدیدترین آهنگای اکسو ♡ زیرخاکی اکسو یا هوش مصنوعی؟ 𖹭 بکهیون گفته از چانیول متنفره؟! ♡ بکهیون، کایرو خلعسلاح میکنه؟ 𖹭 استیکر درخواستی از چانبک اکسو؟ ♡ فیکشن ممنوعه و اسمات بامبی 𖹭 فوتو اكسو كارت ♡ همکاری مرسدس بنز با چانیول؟ 𖹭 بکهیون توسط مونگ تهدید به قتل شد ؟
استیکر اکسو و کاپل معروف کیپاپ چانبک✨ قابل سفارش در سایز دلخواه شما انتخاب کیفیت کاغذ با خودتونه میتونید برش خورده هم تحویل بگیرید 📩 @Bambi_admin04
🍓1
یه دیلی برای پرنسس پاپ این نسل ౨ৎ ⋆𐙚 .🐾 سابرینا کارپنتر توهین سابرینا کارپنتر به عرب هااا اتفاقی که تبدیل شد به یکی از بزرگترین فوبیاهای سابرینا کارپنتر سابرینا با یک فوتبالیست وارد رابطه شده ؟ Join ⤿ @sabrinacarpenterir 💋
سلام به بامبی خیلی خوش اومدین آهو های قشنگم🫐🍓 اینجا قراره هر دو هفته یه محصول جدید معرفی کنیم که با کلی خرید کردن هزینه ارسال براتون سنگین نشه و همرمان چند محصول رو بتونید سفارش بدید میتونید با پرداخت بیانه یعنی نصف مبلغ ، سفارشتون رو ثبت کنید و تا یک ماه براتون نگهش دارم (بخاطر هزینه ارسال) جنس کاغذی که استفاده میشه | برش خوردن استیکر ها | سایز و طرح رو میتونید انتخاب کنید حدودا 10 تا 20 هزار تومن هزینه برش استیکر …
❤2🐳1💘1🕊1
Sticker, posted without a caption
𐙚 BAMBI ╭────────────── ୨୧ ✦ Sticker Collection ✦ 𐙚 سایز: A6 𐙚 جنس: برچسب معمولی 𐙚 قیمت: 38 تومان ♡ ─── ⋆。°✩ ─── 🛒 جهت سفارش: @Bambi_admin04 ╰────────────── ୨୧
❤🔥3🍓1🐳1🦄1
𐙚 BAMBI ╭────────────── ୨୧ ✦ Sticker Collection ✦ 𐙚 سایز: A6 𐙚 جنس: برچسب معمولی 𐙚 قیمت: 38 تومان ♡ ─── ⋆。°✩ ─── 🛒 جهت سفارش: @Bambi_admin04 ╰────────────── ୨୧
❤2🍓1🐳1🦄1
🦌 همهچیز از یه استیکر کوچیک شروع میشه… ♡ استیکرهای خاص، نوتپد، پلنر، بوکمارک و کلی محصول چاپی برای تویی که دوست داری از قشنگترین و خاص ترین عکس هایی که داری محصول داشته باشی 🎀 ✦ طراحیهای خاص ✦ کیفیت چاپ عالی ✦ قیمت مناسب 📩 @BAMBI_sticker
❤🔥1🍓1🐳1💘1🦄1
𐙚 BAMBI ─── ୨୧ ─── وقتی خاص بودن انتخابته، جزئیاتت هم باید خاص باشن.☘ استیکرهای کیوت و خاص، با کیفیتی که قراره عاشقشون بشی. ♡ 🦌 به دنیای بامبی خوش اومدی. ₊˚⊹♡
💘2🍓1🐳1👀1💯1🦄1
ما اینجا فقط استیکر نداریم!!! ✦ بعد از حمایت های شما محصولات متنوع تری میاریم که میتونید اونارو هم با طرح دلخواه داشته باشید 🌱 ✦ جنس برچسب ها در دو مدل ضد آب و معمولی هستش 🎋 ✦ انتخاب جنس کار با خودتونه و باید تفاوت قیمت رو در نظر بگیرید🪴 برچسب ها بستگی به تعدادشون وقتی برش بخورن مبلغ کمی اضافه میشه ولی میتونید برش نخورده هم سفارش بدید☘ ⊱ امکان طراحی اختصاصی سفارش شما ⊱ امکان تحویل برچسب های برش خورده ⊱ امکان تحویل …
🥰5🐳3🍓2💯2🕊1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @BAMBI_sticker. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 191,811 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@cherryxarchive · 941 post 𝐂𝗈𝗅𝖽 𝚮𝖾𝖺𝗋𝗍 ִֶָ࣪
@Cold_heart_6104 · 4341 postKᴀιʙᴀᴇκ нoмᴇ ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ☕️
@kaibaekhome · 3551 post↬Kyungժօო ༉
@Kyungdomi · 1,4321 post〰️▫️ₑₓₒ Bₗ fᵢcₜᵢₒₙ▫️〰
@loneliness_of_words · 8891 post•𝘓𝘜𝘔𝘖 𝘚𝘏𝘖𝘗•
@lumosh0p · 321 post𝐃𝐀𝐑𝐊 𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐓𝐎𝐖𝐍
@REALDARKKINGTOWN · 2161 postسـابرینـا کـارپنـتـر | 𝖲𝖢𝖨𝖱
@sabrinacarpenterir · 1201 postㅤ𝐒ҽ𝐂ԋαɳ𝐁αҽƙ
@SCBtherapy · 9621 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@BAMBI_sticker named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 3 posts, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝖡𝖠𝖬𝖡I | 𝖯𝗋𝗂𝗇𝗍 𝖲𝗁𝗈𝗉” (@BAMBI_sticker), 92 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BAMBI_sticker.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.