Channel
@BAEKJE999
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
73subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003995022030 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BAEKJE999 |
| Description | 국내 개인장 전문 합숙장만 진행 [ 비대면 X ] 문의 @BAEKJE888 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 30 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BAEKJE999 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 73 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 73 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 75 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 6 (30 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,349 |
| Reactions total | 12 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 22:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
12 reactions across 1 post, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 50.0% | |
| 🥱 | 2 | 16.7% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 8.33% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 8.33% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 8.33% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 8.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⠀💖🩷❤️🧡💛💚🩵💙💜💘 ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀🟥🟧🟨🟩🟦🟪 ✔️취급은행 💗💗💗만원 ~ 💗💗💗만원 농협 우리 하나 국민 새마을 경남 신한 대구 카뱅 우체국 ✔️주말 TO 지속적으로 받습니다. 실물 OTP / 실물 신분증 / 본인명의 휴대폰 한도1억/5억💗한도제한만 아니라면 OK 😀😃😄 💗💗💗 ✔️법무부 ✔️루밍 ✔️광부카페 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🖤🖤@BAEKJE888 🖤🖤백제장집 공지채널 입장
합숙 해지 D-1 고생하신 장주님들 믿고 와주신 감사한 장주님들께 합숙 해지하기 전 한번씩 소고기를 대접해 드리고 있습니다. 업종 안 가리고 텔레그램 내에서 문제 많은 곳들은 항상 있기 마련입니다. 선택은 본인의 자유지만 따라오는 후회 또한 선택을 잘못한 본인의 몫이라고 생각합니다. 적어도 저에게 와주신 장주님들, 실장님들께 "아 저기 가서 당했다, 케어 거지같다 등" 이런 소리는 안 들리게끔 앞으로도 젠틀하게 운영하겠습니다.
🕥😀😃😄❤️🩹❣️💕🕦 ✅ 토스실장님 정산완료 [8월 1주차] 토스실장님들 정산 깔끔히 나가고있습니다. 1주차 마무리까지 잘 할 수있도록 합숙 가능하신 장주님들, 실장님들 빠르게 문의주시면 감사하겠습니다.
➖➖🕥😀😃😄🕡🕢🕣🕦➖➖ 안녕하세요. 😀😃😄입니다. 어느덧 7월도 끝이 났네요. 항상 달이 끝날 때마다 느끼는 거지만 아쉬움과 뿌듯함이 공존하는 거 같습니다. 이번 달 채널을 공개 처리하고 난 뒤 많은 실장님들이 연락 주셨었는데 초면부터 예의 없으신 분들 때문에 힘들었지만 1주 차부터 5주 차 마무리까지 많은 장주 님들과 실장님들 덕분에 바쁘고 즐겁게 지낼 수 있었음에 감사합니다. 앞으로도 1등 케어, 깔끔한 정산, 투명한 진행으로 보답 드리겠습니다. 8월 한 달도 잘 부탁드리며 풍성한 한 달 되시길 바랍니다. 😏😏🧐 ✔️단가표 변경 (별도문의) ✔️주별/월별 성과별 보너스구간 생성 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
❤6🥱2🏆1👍1💯1🥰1
🕥😀😃😄❤️🩹❣️💕🕦 ✅ 토스실장님 정산완료 [7월 5주차] 주말간에도 쭉쭉 합숙장 받고있습니다. 주말간 합숙 가능하신 장주님, 실장님 문의주세요.
💖🖤🩶🤍🤎💔❤️🔥💘 ✔️취급은행 💗💗💗만원 ~ 💗💗💗만원 농협 우리 하나 새마을 경남 신한 대구 우체국 국민 카뱅 ➡️ 비선호(사용은 가능) ✔️🥸😤😤 장대 💗💗만원 추가지급 오늘 바로 이동 가능하신 장주님 실물 OTP / 실물 신분증 / 본인명의 휴대폰 합숙 7일 가능자 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 🖤🖤@BAEKJE888 🖤🖤백제장집 공지채널 입장
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @BAEKJE999. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 632,858 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“백제장집 공지방 [국내 개인장]” (@BAEKJE999), 73 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BAEKJE999.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.