Religion โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 19 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegramโs forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts โ open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp โ in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
โPublished firstโ means first in this corpus. We hold 464 comparable posts for this entry, running 1 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detectorโs own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through โ we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 97 days, net -962. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โno change observedโ, never โinterpolatedโ. The vertical axis spans 26,565โ27,815 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 16:39
26,709
-15
9 Nov 2026, 07:16
26,724
-17
8 Nov 2026, 01:39
26,741
+1
7 Nov 2026, 00:00
26,740
-3
5 Nov 2026, 21:56
26,743
-5
4 Nov 2026, 21:56
26,748
-16
3 Nov 2026, 19:16
26,764
-3
2 Nov 2026, 18:51
26,767
-2
1 Nov 2026, 15:45
26,769
-9
31 Oct 2026, 16:04
26,778
-12
30 Oct 2026, 14:49
26,790
-10
29 Oct 2026, 11:35
26,800
-17
28 Oct 2026, 10:35
26,817
-21
27 Oct 2026, 07:48
26,838
-2
26 Oct 2026, 07:06
26,840
-3
25 Oct 2026, 04:18
26,843
-15
24 Oct 2026, 01:21
26,858
-12
22 Oct 2026, 23:00
26,870
-5
21 Oct 2026, 22:28
26,875
-15
20 Oct 2026, 16:37
26,890
first reading
Engagement
655 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 156 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR ยท 30 days
0.537%
avg views รท 26,709 subscribers
Avg views / post
143
228 posts measured
Reaction rate
โ
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
228
of 655 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
655 (29 July 2026 โ 11 November 2026)
Views total
32,675
Reactions total
โ
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 17:26 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
โ3,640
Videos
โ247
Links
โ70
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 11 November 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 56s
Average length
1m 28s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
Recent posts
Telegramโs own โeditedโ marker: 1 of 228 posts held from the last 30 days (0.439%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before โ this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Showing the 12 most recent of 655 posts we hold for @BABATFAwI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @BABATFAwI as deleted โ posts this register held that were missing from the channelโs public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channelโs public page, and when โ not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
23 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
23 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
43 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 135 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channelโs posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@BABATFAwI named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant โ a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@muslimlibrary1 named in 15 posts, 2 October 2026 โ 6 November 2026 ยท confirmed gone 8 November 2026 (two independent sightings โ see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegramโs own answer, not this registerโs. When this register asks Telegramโs API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it โ never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramโs; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegramโs recommendation API, most recently 11 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register โ how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegramโs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
ุงุจุชุณู ููุญูุงุฉ ุชุจุชุณู ูู @t58500 ยท 32,108 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here โ alongside 88 others โ read 4 September 2026
โก ูููุจ ู ุทู ุฆูุฉ โก @hearts2021 ยท 42,300 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here โ alongside 90 others โ read 29 August 2026
ุงูุทูู ุงูู ุณูู @zaaad4 ยท 45,264 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here โ alongside 88 others โ read 27 August 2026
ูู ุณุนูุฏุงู ููุง ุชููุจููุงูู โค๏ธ @Behappe ยท 22,585 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here โ alongside 82 others โ read 19 September 2026
โขโ ุฃุณููุฑุงุฑ ุงูุณููุนุงุฏุฉ โโข @asrar_s ยท 29,532 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here โ alongside 87 others โ read 8 September 2026
ุตูููุฑุฉ๐ธููููููุฑุฉ @Applicationns ยท 40,753 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 77 here โ alongside 76 others โ read 29 August 2026
ุงูุญูุงุฉ ุญููุฉ๐บ @alhayaatuhilwa ยท 43,744 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 97 here โ alongside 96 others โ read 28 August 2026
ูุงุชุญุฒู @F15FF ยท 55,315 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 89 here โ alongside 88 others โ read 23 August 2026
ุฃุบุฑูุฏ ุจูุตูู ูุช @vv5vvv ยท 27,859 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 91 here โ alongside 90 others โ read 9 September 2026
โ๐ป ุฎูุงุทุฑ ูุงุฏุฆุฉ ๐ @Khawatir_hadia ยท 38,674 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 89 here โ alongside 88 others โ read 30 August 2026
ุฏุฑุจ ุงููุฌุงุญ ๐ @Darbalnagah ยท 44,610 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 86 here โ alongside 85 others โ read 27 August 2026
ููููู ูุงุช ููุฏ ุชูุบููุฑ ุญูููุงุชููโกโจ @Positive_leader ยท 87,774 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 86 here โ alongside 85 others โ read 16 August 2026
๐ ุฎูุงุทุฑ ู ู ุฐูุจ ๐ @goold2009 ยท 67,222 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 94 here โ alongside 93 others โ read 20 August 2026
ุฅุฑุดุงุฏุงุช ููุณูุฉ/ุนูู ุงููุคุงุฏ @aa3yyn ยท 75,748 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 85 here โ alongside 84 others โ read 19 August 2026
ู ุทุจุฎ ุงูุจูุช ุงูุณุนูุฏ @thamar5850 ยท 62,865 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 95 here โ alongside 94 others โ read 21 August 2026
ุชุทููุฑ ุงูุฐุงุช ุ โคุชุญููุฒูุฉ @bleegh775 ยท 163,543 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 92 here โ alongside 91 others โ read 12 August 2026
ูู ๐ก ุฅููู ุฌ ูุงุจู @knegabi ยท 43,112 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 94 here โ alongside 93 others โ read 28 August 2026
ุฑูุงุฆุน ุงูููุงู ๐ท๐ฑ @basheeralzazai ยท 49,066 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 94 here โ alongside 93 others โ read 25 August 2026
โ ุฃูุฑุงู ุงููุงุณู ููโ @Awraq_Alyasmin ยท 83,976 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 97 here โ alongside 96 others โ read 18 August 2026
ูู ุณุงุชู ู ู ุงูููุจ๐ธ๐ธ @hmsatmnglba ยท 45,283 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 91 here โ alongside 90 others โ read 27 August 2026
ูฑุฌู ููููู ุข๏ปฺชููุงูู @Ajmal ยท 35,325 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 84 here โ alongside 83 others โ read 1 September 2026
ู ุนุงู ุฅูููู ุงููู โฅ๏ธ๐ฟ @masseg121 ยท 68,897 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 85 here โ alongside 84 others โ read 20 August 2026
ูุตุงุฆุญ ูู ุงูุชุฑุจูุฉ @Thamar18 ยท 54,358 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 95 here โ alongside 94 others โ read 23 August 2026
ุงููุฑุงู ุงููุฑูู @Algrenilkrem ยท 36,681 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 96 here โ alongside 95 others โ read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 34 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 โ this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ธุจุงุจ ุงูุชูุงุคู๐ธโ (@BABATFAwI), 26,709 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BABATFAwI.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.