Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for BIRQ

Channel

BIRQ

@B1RQAZAQ

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

23subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002297950467
TypeChannel
Username@B1RQAZAQ
Created28 November 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/B1RQAZAQ

Growth

2327257 August 2026 — 27 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26 subscribers22 August 2026 — 24 subscribers29 August 2026 — 23 subscribers7 August 202629 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 21 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22–28 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 00:0723-1
22 Aug 2026, 18:2424-2
14 Aug 2026, 22:0326-1
11 Aug 2026, 07:4627no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:1327first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 28 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
39s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

194 reactions across 6 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54475156237834179463719.1%
custom 54476092884302103602613.4%
custom 54700079551957088382613.4%
custom 51949069633553862442211.3%
custom 5237752792596110719136.70%
custom 5237869568461920235136.70%
custom 5204305056173669856126.19%
custom 5325623730368430152126.19%
custom 519536882266356056894.64%
custom 523780620051443615994.64%
custom 542511862346522321894.64%
custom 518854911897215077242.06%
custom 518857555020088516321.03%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 194 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 28 November 2024 to 19 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 13 we hold a reading for · 31%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @B1RQAZAQ. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 November 2024 to 19 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Apr 2026, 07:06 UTC262 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

КФ ЗАКРЫТ / ПАТЕНТ ЗА НАМИ Приносим свои извинения что закрыли без предупреждения 🙌🏻 Может когда то (?) вернемся с новыми силами Айып етпендер 🙏🏻

custom 51885755502008851632custom 51885491189721507721custom 51949069633553862441custom 54251186234652232181custom 54475156237834179461

11 Apr 2026, 21:22 UTC535 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026

We always comeback.💀

custom 53256237303684301522custom 54475156237834179462custom 51885491189721507721custom 51949069633553862441custom 52043050561736698561custom 54251186234652232181custom 54476092884302103601

8 Dec 2025, 05:44 UTC≈1,130 viewsread 11 August 2026

смотрим на оформление профиля!

11 Sept 2025, 06:17 UTC≈2,210 views52 reactions9 Starsread 11 August 2026
Video

✅Crush list by BIRQ 🥷 🔔порядок не имеет значение, список будет дополняться.

custom 523786956846192023512custom 51953688226635605688custom 52377527925961107198custom 52043050561736698565custom 51949069633553862444custom 53256237303684301524custom 54251186234652232184custom 54475156237834179464

30 May 2025, 16:27 UTC≈3,570 views13 reactions3 Starsread 11 August 2026

📤 bizdiń archive @archivebirq 📤 video archive @varchivebirq

custom 52377527925961107193custom 51949069633553862442custom 52043050561736698562custom 54475156237834179462custom 51885491189721507721custom 52378062005144361591custom 53256237303684301521custom 54251186234652232181

28 Nov 2024, 11:58 UTC≈9,120 views63 reactions12 Starsread 11 August 2026
Video

👕We’re not in your league ⌨ we’re the league you wish you could play in.

custom 544751562378341794619custom 544760928843021036014custom 547000795519570883813custom 51949069633553862447custom 52043050561736698562custom 52378062005144361592custom 54251186234652232182custom 51885491189721507721

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @B1RQAZAQ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“BIRQ” (@B1RQAZAQ), 23 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/B1RQAZAQ.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.