Channel
@Azmoon_EPT_PHD
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
167subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003465282258 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Azmoon_EPT_PHD |
| Description | تحلیل تستها و تدریس مهمترین نکات آزمونهای IELTS, MSRT, EPT، مشاوره و تعیین سطح توسط سارا کیهانزاده (استاد دانشگاه و مدرس آیلتس با بیش از بیست سال سابقه تدریس تضمینی و مولف چندین کتاب تحلیلی در راستای آموزش نکات کاربردی زبان انگلیسی) |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Azmoon_EPT_PHD |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 167 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:22 | 167 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 419 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
5 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 60.0% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 20.0% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
3. The new regulation is intended to ___ the gap between the rich and the poor.
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
2. Despite the evidence, he ___ to believe that the project would fail.
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
1. The government's decision to increase taxes has ___ a lot of controversy among the public.
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
این تست یک «کلید طلایی» دارد که اگر آن را ببینی، در ۳ ثانیه جواب میگیری. کلید طلایی: عبارت "*By the time*" (تا زمانی که...). منطق گرامری: *وقتی در جمله By the time داریم و به آینده اشاره میشود (next month)، ما دنبال زمانی هستیم که یک کاری «تا قبل از» یک نقطه خاص در آینده «تمام شده باشد». این یعنیً زمان Future Perfect (آینده کامل). فرمول آینده کامل: will have + p.p (قسمت سوم فعل) * بررسی گزینهها: - A) will co…
❤1
By the time the new manager takes over the department next month, the current team __ the most challenging project of the year. A) will complete✌️ B) will have completed👌 C) completes❤️ D) would have completed🙏
👌1
اول از همه، هر وقت جمله با Not only شروع شود، زنگ خطر 🚨 به صدا در میآید! این یعنی ما با یک «*وارونگی*» طرف هستیم. قانون طلایی: *در وارونگی، جای فاعل و فعل کمکی عوض میشود (جمله شبیه سوال میشود).* بررسی گزینهها: - A) he had conducted: (غلط ❌) ترتیب عادی است (فاعل و فعل). هیچ وارونگی رخ نداده. - B) did he conduct: (درست ✅) وارونه شده: did (کمکی) (فاعل) (فعل اصلی). چرا did؟ چون در بخش دوم جمله فعل provided (گذش…
Not only __ the research thoroughly, but he also provided a detailed analysis of the potential outcomes in his final report. A) he had conducted🙏 B) did he conduct👌 C) has he conducted❤️ D) had he conducted👏
تحلیل سئوال: اینجا یک تضاد (*Contrast*) داریم. نویسنده میگوید سقوط امپراتوری "*Not due to a single event"* (به خاطر یک اتفاق واحد نبود)، *"But rather" * (بلکه در واقع...). *پس ما دنبال کلمهای هستیم که «متضادِ یک اتفاق واحد» باشد.* *چیزی که ذرهذره جمع شده و در نهایت باعث* *سقوط شده است*. عبارت "*over several decades"* (در طول چندین دهه) کلید طلایی این سوال است. گزینهها و تلفظ: - A) *Cumulative* /…
🛠 تکنیک ۱: جستجوی «کلیدواژه» (Keyword Spotting) در این جمله، دو عبارت کلیدی داریم که مثل چراغ راهنما هستند: ۱. "failed to address" (نتوانست برطرف کند/پرداخت کند) ۲. "only provided a temporary solution" (فقط یک راه حل موقتی ارائه داد) منطق: وقتی یک سیاست (policy) نتواند مشکل اصلی را حل کند و فقط یک اثر موقتی داشته باشد، یعنی آن سیاست «بیاثر» یا «ناکارآمد» بوده است. 🛠 تکنیک ۲: تحلیل «تضاد و نتیجه» (Cause & …
The newly implemented policy proved to be __, as it failed to address the core issues of the organization and only provided a temporary solution to the problem. A) indispensable B) ineffective C) comprehensive D) detrimental
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Many historians argue that the fall of the empire was not due to a single event, but rather a __ result of economic instability and political corruption over several decades. A) cumulative👍 B) spontaneous🙏 C) superficial🤲 D) negligible👌
افرین اون چند نفری که پاسخ دادید کاملا پاسخ درست رو دادین ولی چرا اینقدر تعداد کم پاسخ میدین 😢 به کلمه *Despite* (علیرغم) دقت کنید. این کلمه تضاد ایجاد میکند. - بخش اول: initial setbacks (شکستهای اولیه/سنگ انداختن جلوی پا). 📉 - بخش دوم: تیم باید *«با وجود شکست*» به تلاشش ادامه دهد. پس باید «*سرسخت*» باشد. - معنی Adamant /ˈædəmant/: یعنی کسی که روی تصمیمش پافشاری میکند و به هیچ وجه تسلیم نمیشود. ✅ ❌ چرا ب…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Azmoon_EPT_PHD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
3. The new regulation is intended to ___ the gap between the rich and the poor.
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
2. Despite the evidence, he ___ to believe that the project would fail.
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
1. The government's decision to increase taxes has ___ a lot of controversy among the public.
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
The newly implemented policy proved to be __, as it failed to address the core issues of the organization and only provided a temporary solution to the problem. A) indispensable B) ineffective C) comprehensive D) detrimental
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 410,241 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آموزش زبان EPT دکتری” (@Azmoon_EPT_PHD), 167 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Azmoon_EPT_PHD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.