Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for آموزش زبان EPT دکتری

Channel

آموزش زبان EPT دکتری

@Azmoon_EPT_PHD

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

179subscribers

+12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003465282258
TypeChannel
Username@Azmoon_EPT_PHD
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 October 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/Azmoon_EPT_PHD

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1671791736 August 2026 — 167 subscribers8 August 2026 — 167 subscribers27 August 2026 — 173 subscribers4 September 2026 — 175 subscribers12 September 2026 — 174 subscribers28 September 2026 — 176 subscribers8 October 2026 — 179 subscribers6 August 20268 October 2026
7 measurements spanning 63 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 165–181 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Oct 2026, 10:39179+3
28 Sept 2026, 11:00176+2
12 Sept 2026, 12:38174-1
4 Sept 2026, 13:19175+2
27 Aug 2026, 23:34173+6
8 Aug 2026, 15:45167no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:22167first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤360.0%
👌120.0%
🙏120.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC2 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

3. The new regulation is intended to ___ the gap between the rich and the poor.

  1. Span0%
  2. Connect0%
  3. Link0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC2 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

2. Despite the evidence, he ___ to believe that the project would fail.

  1. a) persisted in0%
  2. c) adhered to0%
  3. d) clung to0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 15:28 UTC2 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

1. The government's decision to increase taxes has ___ a lot of controversy among the public.

  1. b) ignited0%
  2. c) burst0%
  3. d) flared0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Aug 2026, 12:50 UTC21 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

این تست یک «کلید طلایی» دارد که اگر آن را ببینی، در ۳ ثانیه جواب می‌گیری. کلید طلایی: عبارت "*By the time*" (تا زمانی که...). ‌ منطق گرامری: *وقتی در جمله By the time داریم و به آینده اشاره می‌شود (next month)، ما دنبال زمانی هستیم که یک کاری «تا قبل از» یک نقطه خاص در آینده «تمام شده باشد». این یعنیً زمان Future Perfect (آینده کامل). ‌ فرمول آینده کامل: will have + p.p (قسمت سوم فعل) ‌* بررسی گزینه‌ها: - A) will co…

❤1

5 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC29 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

By the time the new manager takes over the department next month, the current team __ the most challenging project of the year. A) will complete✌️ B) will have completed👌 C) completes❤️ D) would have completed🙏

👌1

5 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC25 viewsread 8 August 2026

اول از همه، هر وقت جمله با Not only شروع شود، زنگ خطر 🚨 به صدا در می‌آید! این یعنی ما با یک «*وارونگی*» طرف هستیم. قانون طلایی: *در وارونگی، جای فاعل و فعل کمکی عوض می‌شود (جمله شبیه سوال می‌شود).* ‌ بررسی گزینه‌ها: - A) he had conducted: (غلط ❌) ترتیب عادی است (فاعل و فعل). هیچ وارونگی رخ نداده. - B) did he conduct: (درست ✅) وارونه شده: did (کمکی) (فاعل) (فعل اصلی). چرا did؟ چون در بخش دوم جمله فعل provided (گذش…

5 Aug 2026, 14:36 UTC19 viewsread 8 August 2026

Not only __ the research thoroughly, but he also provided a detailed analysis of the potential outcomes in his final report. A) he had conducted🙏 B) did he conduct👌 C) has he conducted❤️ D) had he conducted👏

4 Aug 2026, 19:52 UTC23 viewsread 8 August 2026

تحلیل سئوال: اینجا یک تضاد (*Contrast*) داریم. نویسنده می‌گوید سقوط امپراتوری "*Not due to a single event"* (به خاطر یک اتفاق واحد نبود)، *"But rather" * (بلکه در واقع...). *پس ما دنبال کلمه‌ای هستیم که «متضادِ یک اتفاق واحد» باشد.* *چیزی که ذره‌ذره جمع شده و در نهایت باعث* *سقوط شده است*. عبارت "*over several decades"* (در طول چندین دهه) کلید طلایی این سوال است. ‌ گزینه‌ها و تلفظ: ‌ - A) *Cumulative* /…

4 Aug 2026, 19:50 UTC20 viewsread 8 August 2026

🛠 تکنیک ۱: جستجوی «کلیدواژه» (Keyword Spotting) در این جمله، دو عبارت کلیدی داریم که مثل چراغ راهنما هستند: ۱. "failed to address" (نتوانست برطرف کند/پرداخت کند) ۲. "only provided a temporary solution" (فقط یک راه حل موقتی ارائه داد) ‌ منطق: وقتی یک سیاست (policy) نتواند مشکل اصلی را حل کند و فقط یک اثر موقتی داشته باشد، یعنی آن سیاست «بی‌اثر» یا «ناکارآمد» بوده است. ‌ ‌ 🛠 تکنیک ۲: تحلیل «تضاد و نتیجه» (Cause & …

4 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC22 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

The newly implemented policy proved to be __, as it failed to address the core issues of the organization and only provided a temporary solution to the problem. A) indispensable B) ineffective C) comprehensive D) detrimental

  1. Indispensable0%
  2. Ineffective83%
  3. Comprehensive17%
  4. Detrimental0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC22 viewsread 8 August 2026

Many historians argue that the fall of the empire was not due to a single event, but rather a __ result of economic instability and political corruption over several decades. A) cumulative👍 B) spontaneous🙏 C) superficial🤲 D) negligible👌 ‌

3 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC23 viewsread 8 August 2026

افرین اون چند نفری که پاسخ دادید کاملا پاسخ درست رو دادین ولی چرا اینقدر تعداد کم پاسخ میدین 😢 به کلمه *Despite* (علی‌رغم) دقت کنید. این کلمه تضاد ایجاد می‌کند. - بخش اول: initial setbacks (شکست‌های اولیه/سنگ انداختن جلوی پا). 📉 - بخش دوم: تیم باید *«با وجود شکست*» به تلاشش ادامه دهد. پس باید «*سرسخت*» باشد. - معنی Adamant /ˈædəmant/: یعنی کسی که روی تصمیمش پافشاری می‌کند و به هیچ وجه تسلیم نمی‌شود. ✅ ‌ ❌ چرا ب…

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Azmoon_EPT_PHD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTCAnonymous Poll1 voter

3. The new regulation is intended to ___ the gap between the rich and the poor.

  1. Span0%
  2. Connect0%
  3. Link0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTCAnonymous Poll1 voter

2. Despite the evidence, he ___ to believe that the project would fail.

  1. a) persisted in0%
  2. c) adhered to0%
  3. d) clung to0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 15:28 UTCAnonymous Poll1 voter

1. The government's decision to increase taxes has ___ a lot of controversy among the public.

  1. b) ignited0%
  2. c) burst0%
  3. d) flared0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTCAnonymous Poll6 voters

The newly implemented policy proved to be __, as it failed to address the core issues of the organization and only provided a temporary solution to the problem. A) indispensable B) ineffective C) comprehensive D) detrimental

  1. Indispensable0%
  2. Ineffective83%
  3. Comprehensive17%
  4. Detrimental0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“آموزش زبان EPT دکتری” (@Azmoon_EPT_PHD), 179 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Azmoon_EPT_PHD.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.