Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Axiom

@Axiiiiom

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

657subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001925108326
TypeChannel
Username@Axiiiiom
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Axiiiiom

Growth

656657656.57 Aug 2026, 13:09 — 656 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 02:45 — 656 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 08:58 — 657 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 13:098 Aug 2026, 08:58
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 656–657 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 08:58657+1
8 Aug 2026, 02:45656no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:09656first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.2%
avg views ÷ 657 subscribers
Avg views / post
120
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held14 (3 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,673
Reactions total36
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 02:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 45s
Average length
1m 45s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

36 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1438.9%
925.0%
😭513.9%
👌411.1%
😢25.56%
👎12.78%
😁12.78%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 22:06 UTC26 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

🔘🔘🔘 🔸 نازی، دارم نگاه می‌کنم و چیزها در من می‌روید. در این روز ابری، چه روشنم. همه رودهای جهان به من می‌ریزد. به من که با هیچ پر می‌شوم. خاک انباشته از زیبایی است. دیگر چشم‌های من جا ندارد… چشم‌های ما کوچک نیست. زیبایی کرانه ندارد. 🔸 در زمانه‌ی ما نگاه کردن نیاموخته‌اند. و درخت، جز آرایش خانه نیست. و هیچ‌کس گل‌های حیاط همسایه را باور ندارد. پیوندها گسسته. کسی در مهتاب راه نمی‌رود. و از پرواز کلاغی هشیار نمی‌شود. و

7 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTC76 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⁨🔘🔘🔘 🔸 این پست درباره‌ی شکیرا نیست! درباره‌ی نگاهیه که ارزش زن رو با مطلوب بودنش برای مرد می‌سنجه! درباره‌ی اینه که چطور کلیشه‌های جنسیت‌زده، تو ساده‌ترین واکنش‌های روزمره‌ی ما، خودشون رو بازتولید می‌کنند!⁩ این روزها که حالِ هیچ‌کداممان خوب نیست، آخرین چیزی که به آن نیاز داریم، بازتولید زن‌ستیزی است. 🔘🔘🔘 @Axiiiiom

👍3

6 Aug 2026, 22:22 UTC85 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔘🔘🔘 🔸 ای انسان! به یاد آور، که رنجِ تو، در چشمانِ شب، مانند شعله‌ای خاموش نمی‌شود، بلکه همچون آذرخشی، سینه‌ی آسمان را خواهد شکافت. [ دانیل واروژان ] 🔘🔘🔘 @Axiiiiom

6 Aug 2026, 21:26 UTC92 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔘🔘🔘 🔸 ما اغلب از کسانی که سکوت می‌کنند می‌پرسیم: چرا چیزی نمی‌گویی؟ گویی حرف نزدن همیشه نشانه‌ی نداشتن است. 🔸 اما گاهی سکوت نتیجه‌ی داشتن بیش از اندازه است. همان‌طور که اتاقی بسیار شلوغ، دیگر جایی برای حرکت باقی نمی‌گذارد، ذهنی که از تجربه انباشته شده نیز گاهی دیگر راهی برای عبور واژه‌ها پیدا نمی‌کند. 🔸 شاید سکوت فقط ناتوانی در گفتن نباشد؛ گاهی خودِ امتناع از گفتن است، راهی برای حفظ چیزی که هنوز آماده‌ی بیان نیست.

1

6 Aug 2026, 21:09 UTC94 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔘🔘🔘 🔸داستان سیندرلا یه جورایی درباره این هم هست که چطور زن‌ها یا بخش‌هایی از وجود خود زن‌ها می‌تونن دشمن آرزوها و خواسته‌های خودشون باشن. داستانی درباره اینکه چطور زن‌ها از ترسِ حسادت بقیه زن‌ها، ترجیح میدن خودشون، خودشون رو ناکام بذارن. [ آدام فیلیپس ] 🔸 تا زمانی که سیندرلا اجازه می‌داد نامادری بهش زور بگه، از شرِ اینکه "از زندگی چیز زیادی برای خودش بخواد" خلاص بود! بشور و بساب یه جور پناهگاه بوده! انگار بعضی ا

👍3

6 Aug 2026, 20:55 UTC94 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔘🔘🔘 🔸 شاید عمیق‌ترین هدیه درمان روانکاوانه این باشد: این که برای نخستین بار، کسی شاهد دنیای درونی تو باشد؛ نه برای قضاوت، نه برای نجات دادن، بلکه برای ماندن در کنار آن تا آنچه تحمل‌ناپذیر بوده، اندک اندک قابل تحمل و قابل اندیشیدن شود. 🔘🔘🔘 @Axiiiiom

1

6 Aug 2026, 20:54 UTC91 viewsread 8 August 2026
File

🔘🔘🔘 🔸 🎤 علیرضا قربانی - 🎼 هم‌قفس ﺗﻮﻳﻰ ﻛﻪ ﻫﻢ‌ﻗﻔﺴﻰ ﺑﺒﻴﻦ ﻛﻪ ﻣﻦ ﻧﻔﺴﻰ نمی‌کشم ﺗﻮ اﮔﺮ ﺑﻪ داد ﻣﻦ ﻧﺮﺳﻰ 🔘🔘🔘 @Axiiiiom

5 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC134 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔘🔘🔘 🔸 بعضی جمله‌ها آنقدر تکرار شده‌اند که دیگر کسی نمی‌پرسد از کجا آمده‌اند. «من آدمِ سردی‌ام.» «من هیچ‌وقت نمی‌توانم اعتماد کنم.» «من برای رابطه ساخته نشده‌ام.» «من همیشه همین بوده‌ام.» 🔸 این‌ها فقط جمله نیستند. گاهی نام‌هایی هستند که سوژه سال‌ها پیش برای دوام آوردن، به آن‌ها پناه برده است. نام‌هایی که قرار بود موقت باشند. اما آن‌قدر تکرار شده‌اند که کم‌کم به جای سوژه شروع کردند به حرف زدن. تحلیل، جایی نیست که این

5😭1

4 Aug 2026, 21:21 UTC157 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔘🔘🔘 🔸 " بیماریِ هنجار بودن " غریب‌ترین نوعِ آسیب است. فرد به صورت غیرعادی و افراطی "نرمال و معقول" است! او تمام انرژی‌اش را روی اشیاء، کارها و روتین‌ها می‌گذارد، در حالی که ارتباطش با دنیای درونی، فانتزی‌ها و حیاتِ ناهشیارِ خویش کاملاً قطع شده است. [ کریستوفر بولاس ] 🔸بولاس معتقد است در زندگی شخصیت‌های نورموتیک (بیش از حد نرمال)، انگار هیچ اتفاق خاصی نمی‌افتد. کودک در فضای منظم بزرگ می‌شود، اسباب‌بازی دارد و کمب

👌2

4 Aug 2026, 21:13 UTC141 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

🔘🔘🔘 🔸 🎤 فرهاد مهراد - 🎼 یه شبِ مهتاب یه شب مهتاب ماه میاد تو خواب . . . . ﻣﺴﺘﻴﻢ و ﻫﺸﻴﺎر ﺷﻬﻴﺪای ﺷﻬﺮ ﺧﻮاﺑﻴﻢ و ﺑﻴﺪار ﺷﻬﻴﺪای ﺷﻬﺮ آﺧﺮش ﻳﻪ ﺷﺐ ﻣﺎه ﻣﻴﺎد ﺑﻴﺮون از ﺳﺮ اون ﻛﻮه ﺑﺎﻟﺎی دره روی اﻳﻦ ﻣﻴﺪون رد ﻣﻴﺸﻪ ﺧﻨﺪون ﻳﻪ ﺷﺐ ﻣﺎه ﻣﻴﺎد 🔘🔘🔘 @Axiiiiom

1

4 Aug 2026, 08:54 UTC158 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔘🔘🔘 🔸 باید حرف بزنی، وگرنه سرت تبدیل به گورستان می‌شود. [ چاک پالانیک ] 🔘🔘🔘 @Axiiiiom

👍1

3 Aug 2026, 22:12 UTC182 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🔘🔘🔘 🔸 انسان‌ها معمولاً در سوگ حیوان خانگی‌شان تنهاترند. جامعه این سوگ را کمتر به رسمیت می‌شناسد و فرد سوگوار همدلی کمتری دریافت می‌کند. این در حالیست که این سوگ با احساس گناه زیادی همراه است: ناتوانی پت در ابراز دردش و ناتوانی انسان در نجات دادنش. 🔘🔘🔘 @Axiiiiom

👍7😢2👌1👎1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @Axiiiiom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 610,804 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Axiom” (@Axiiiiom), 657 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Axiiiiom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.