Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝓐 w𝘰𝘳𝘪'୨𐍸୧ ؗ

@Aworioi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

86subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003960567751
TypeChannel
Username@Aworioi
Descriptiontiktok.com/@awori_oi Начало 13.05.2026 Конец Never die https://t.me/boost/Aworioi - boost
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 6 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/Aworioi

Growth

868786.57 August 2026 — 87 subscribers8 August 2026 — 86 subscribers9 August 2026 — 86 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 2 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 86–87 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 16:3386no change
8 Aug 2026, 19:2286-1
7 Aug 2026, 19:1587first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
71.8%
avg views ÷ 86 subscribers
Avg views / post
61.8
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
12.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 July 2026
Posts held20 (6 July 202617 July 2026)
Views total247
Reactions total16
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
26
Links
24

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

50 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53212436325256650031122.0%
custom 53235918242903742231020.0%
custom 5239941842937608222816.0%
custom 5242388891964568799816.0%
custom 5321201786659303279714.0%
custom 5240293377420851167612.0%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Jul 2026, 21:19 UTC62 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

✨ 🎀𝔢𝔴 🎀𝔯𝔞𝔠𝔱𝔦𝔠𝔢 ✨ ➿➿➿➿➖➿➿➿➿ ~ 𝔤o !! ~ 🎯 ✨ 𝔬𝔯𝔦𝔤 𝔟𝔶 𝖆𝖞𝖆. ✨ 18 . O7 . 🔥 ➿➿➿➿➖➿➿➿➿

custom 53212436325256650034custom 52423888919645687993custom 52402933774208511672

17 Jul 2026, 21:13 UTC62 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

всем привеет !! как вы ?

custom 53212017866593032793custom 53235918242903742232custom 52402933774208511671custom 52423888919645687991

12 Jul 2026, 18:36 UTC92 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

А вы знаете , мне на ушко сказали что дебют скоро ))) 🤟🏻

custom 53235918242903742234custom 52399418429376082222custom 52423888919645687991

7 Jul 2026, 20:40 UTC127 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

нам передали эстафету! суть эстафеты очень простая: в течение суток мы не будем заходить в комментарии под этим постом. за это время вы можете написать нам всё, что захотите: свои мысли, вопросы, пожелания, признания или просто что-нибудь от себя и скрыть под спойлер передаем Glit entertainment Tri kota oi

custom 53235918242903742232

6 Jul 2026, 19:25 UTC118 viewsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Как думаете какой КБ?

  1. We go up19%
  2. Wild6%
  3. Choom32%
  4. Supa dupa luv6%
  5. Psycho55%
  6. Drip13%
  7. Really like you10%
  8. Sheesh13%
  9. Наша кнопка26%

The shares total 180%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

6 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTC92 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Хочу ответить на данный пост Спасибо за комплимент об оформлении, но то что мы просим рк это базово, я хочу проверить сколько людей в сети, а также хочу актива, я понимаю у многих дела и т.д, но можно просто проверить резы через пару минут или когда освободишься, вчера мы перенесли потому что многие уже ушли спать и в сети было не много людей, мы решили сделать резы в более удобное время 16:00-17:00 по мск данное вр

custom 52399418429376082223custom 52423888919645687991custom 53235918242903742231

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Aworioi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Jul 2026, 19:25 UTCAnonymous Poll31 voters

Как думаете какой КБ?

  1. We go up19%
  2. Wild6%
  3. Choom32%
  4. Supa dupa luv6%
  5. Psycho55%
  6. Drip13%
  7. Really like you10%
  8. Sheesh13%
  9. Наша кнопка26%

The shares total 180%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 17 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 850,479 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝓐 w𝘰𝘳𝘪'୨𐍸୧ ؗ” (@Aworioi), 86 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Aworioi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.