Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for عودة رجل 𝕭𝖆𝖗𝖆𝖆🔻

Channel

عودة رجل 𝕭𝖆𝖗𝖆𝖆🔻

@Awdat_Ragul

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

277subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003349332039
TypeChannel
Username@Awdat_Ragul
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Awdat_Ragul

Growth

276277276.57 August 2026 — 276 subscribers8 August 2026 — 276 subscribers14 August 2026 — 277 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 276–277 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 18:06277+1
8 Aug 2026, 08:35276no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:33276first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
69.9%
avg views ÷ 277 subscribers
Avg views / post
194
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held20 (23 June 20261 August 2026)
Views total1,161
Reactions total43
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

234 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
20788.5%
❤‍🔥114.70%
👍52.14%
🥰52.14%
🕊41.71%
🤷‍♂20.855%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 234reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 21:45 UTC100 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

لَنْ تَبْلُغَ الْمَجْدَ حَتَّى تَلْعَقَ الصَّبِرَا دَبِبْتَ لِلْمَجْدِ وَالسَّاعُونَ قَدْ بَلَغُوا حَـدَّ النُّفُوسِ وَأَلْقَوا دُونَهُ الأزرا وَكَابَدُوا المَجْدَ حَتَّى مَلَّ أَكْثَرُهُمْ وَعَانَقَ المَجْد مَنْ وَفى وَمَنْ صَبَرَا لاَتَحْسِب المَجْدَ تَمْراً أَنْتَ آكِلَـهُ لَنْ تَبْلُغَ المَجْدَ حَتَّى تَلْعِقَ الصَّبِرَا 🧏🏻‍♂معلومة جانبية: تلعقَ الصبِرا وليس الصبر. والصَّبِرُ: هو عُصَارَةُ شَجَرٍ مُرٍّ تُسْتَ

6

30 Jul 2026, 09:22 UTC139 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

﴿إِنِّي لِعَمَلِكُم مِّنَ الْقَالِينَ﴾

6🥰1

29 Jul 2026, 13:21 UTC168 viewsread 8 August 2026

🔻"جروب دعم المتعافين من المثلية"🔻 ا ﷽ ا السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته.🦋🌴 الجروب ده لدعم المتعافين من المثلية فقط، وليس جروب دعم نفسي (لو عندك مشاكل نفسية ومحتاج دعم نفسي تابع مع مختصين نفسيين). 🎯 هدف الجروب إنه يكون متنفس صحي وآمن نقدر نفضفض فيه، نتكلم، نشارك تجاربنا في التعافي مع بعض (تجاربنا في التعافي مش في المثلية)، ونلاقي اللي يسمعنا ويدعمنا... وكبديل صحي لإشباع احتياجنا للتواصل.💎

28 Jul 2026, 08:13 UTC159 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

بفكر أعمل جروب دعم للناس اللي في قناة عودة رجل فقط (لحاجة في نفس يعقوب)... وإن شاء الله هختار منهم كام مشرف يدير الجروب معايا... فهل الناس تؤيد إنشاء الجروب ولا لأ؟

  1. ✅ نعم.88%
  2. ❌ لا.12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6🕊2

25 Jul 2026, 11:05 UTC451 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

﴿وَمَا آمَنَ مَعَهُ إِلَّا قَلِيلٌ﴾

14

18 Jul 2026, 08:20 UTC297 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🧏🏻‍♂امشي على خطة تعافي شاملة وخطواتها محددة... حتى لو أنت اللي عاملها بنفسك. تعافي بدون خطة... تعافي بلا هدف. مصطفى.✍️

17👍1

16 Jul 2026, 08:20 UTC940 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

"المثلية بديل غير مُرضي لحلم ضائع." مصطفى.✍️

10🤷‍♂2

14 Jul 2026, 20:20 UTC≈1,220 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

"البدائل الصحية" من أهم العوامل اللي ساعدتني على مدار رحلة التعافي، وساعدتني أدخل بقوة في مرحلة النقاهة –بعد توفيق الله–، كانت "البدائل الصحية". من خلال تجربتي في الحياة، بقى عندي قناعة إن البديل الصحي القوي للسلوك الخاطئ قادر يساعدك تتعافى منه... ويمكن أحيانًا من غير خطة علاجية معقدة أو غوص في تفاصيل وتحليل عميق. أول تجربة عشتها مع البدائل الصحية كانت مع "التعافي من سماع الأغاني"... كان البديل القوي بالنسبة لي لل

14

11 Jul 2026, 15:07 UTC406 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

"اسلُك سُبُل الهُدَى ولا يضُرُّك قِلَّة السَالِكين، وتَجَنَّب سُبُل الضَلالة ولا يغُرُّك كثرة الهَالِكين."

13

10 Jul 2026, 11:40 UTC≈1,040 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

"البدايات للجميع، والاستمرار للصادقين... فالبقاء ليس للأقوى، بل للأصدق." مصطفى.✍️

15

5 Jul 2026, 16:55 UTC≈1,320 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

"التعافي اعتقاد؛ فإن اعتقدت أنه ممكن، أصبح ممكنًا... وإن حكمت عليه بالمستحيل، فقد انتهت المحاولة قبل أن تبدأ." مصطفى.✍️

14🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Awdat_Ragul. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jul 2026, 08:13 UTCFinal Results34 voters

بفكر أعمل جروب دعم للناس اللي في قناة عودة رجل فقط (لحاجة في نفس يعقوب)... وإن شاء الله هختار منهم كام مشرف يدير الجروب معايا... فهل الناس تؤيد إنشاء الجروب ولا لأ؟

  1. ✅ نعم.88%
  2. ❌ لا.12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 1 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 33,769 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“عودة رجل 𝕭𝖆𝖗𝖆𝖆🔻” (@Awdat_Ragul), 277 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Awdat_Ragul.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.