Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
Asymmetry
@AsymmetryFinance
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
35subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001699708000 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AsymmetryFinance |
| Description | Providing A Gourmet Of Asymmetry For The Tastebuds |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 17 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AsymmetryFinance |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 35 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:59 | 35 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 17 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 June 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 348
- Videos
- 6
- Links
- 337
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
bbaldieri (Twitter) So I've gone full circle and come back to @SubstackInc Firstly, I have no idea how to handle SEO etc. Secondly, network effects and suggested publications have meant my old substack grew faster than both Ghost and my blog. Third, better UX. Here's my new publication: The Network Economy. I’ll be posting once a week, minimum. All articles will be referenced from primary sources wherever poss…
ganisations. To understand why this is the case, one must consider how different forms of organisation interact. When a form emerges, the new undermines the old. The resultant clash of paradigms creates friction. Older forms of organisation will seek to crush or coopt the new by restricting how and where value can flow into this new form. If a previous form can limit access or growth, maturation will slow or even h…
bbaldieri (Twitter) New Full Article - How #DAOs and #Blockchain Could Rewrite #Business Structure Disruption defines the 21st Century. Technologies like the internet, social media and the smartphone have changed the fundamental nature of society. While they epitomise the disruption we have come to accept, few receive the same scrutiny as blockchain. This is because blockchain technology disrupts our understanding …
Photo, posted without a caption
bbaldieri (Twitter) The future, after all, is built on the foundations of the past, and the deeper we can lay those foundations, the stronger that future will be.
bbaldieri (Twitter) To further understand what I mean, check out this article (excuse the slug, ghost isn't playing ball): benbaldieri.io/untitled-2/
bbaldieri (Twitter) Our challenges are not unique, nor do our solutions need to be, and there is a lot to be learned from ideas that may appear to run counter to the egalitarian future we are trying to build.
bbaldieri (Twitter) If we were to turn our gaze outwards and look to legacy industries for solutions, we would probably find them, as our similarities are more important than our differences. What are those similarities? People.
bbaldieri (Twitter) The issue here is in taking a solely future-focused perspective, we perpetuate the same fundamental problem that plagues not just legacy industries but human society as a whole: “Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.”
bbaldieri (Twitter) This means we all have a massive blindspot. The blindspot exists because we all insist on disregarding existing solutions from outside because of the misplaced belief that #Web3 is “the future”.
bbaldieri (Twitter) I think #DAOs have tremendous potential, and the ideas and values surrounding the democratisation of #governance should be cherished and expanded upon. The problem is that potential is not being realised. Why not?
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AsymmetryFinance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 4
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 4
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@AsymmetryFinance named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 3 posts, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Asymmetry” (@AsymmetryFinance), 35 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AsymmetryFinance.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.