Channel
@AstreidesAnalytics
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,090subscribers
-46 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001150783830 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AstreidesAnalytics |
| Created | Between 1 January 2019 and 31 August 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AstreidesAnalytics |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 2,090 | -16 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 2,106 | -19 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:27 | 2,125 | -11 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:05 | 2,136 | first reading |
27 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (4 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,529 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Btw I got an idea which I would implement in my product, but it will be a suprise) It’s something what no trading terminal has, no trading bot, but it would be so useful for many people that they would go to my product for this feature.
Signed Nix Astreides
Considering progress, @PUMPnDUMPdexBOT Storm venue is released and Hyperliquid venue in testing. While @NoSafeTradeBot is in heavy testing still.
Signed Nix Astreides
@PUMPnDUMPdexBOT will be merged with @NoSafeTradeBot! As we develop both products, we start to notice that we start to slightly intersect. v0.2.0 of @PUMPnDUMPdexBOT and v1.0.0 of @NoSafeTradeBot are not that interconnected yet, but future planned updates already intersect their features what already brings an idea - why not to merge them? And why to wait for future updates when we already can do it? And here we are!…
Signed Nix Astreides
I researched different blockchains volumes as I develop my trade bot and believe it or not TON is not the worst yet lol, at all. TON actually fills at category of average. Average used blockchain has 1-10mil volume daily. Only outliners like Solana, Robinhood, BNB chain, HyperLiquid, ETH have many times more, but we know they are hyped, what the real dead ones are those who are lower than 1mil volume daily - and thos…
Signed Nix Astreides
I think it happens because I start to connect all the dots and understand how it’s going to be done. And it’s rare. Most of the time I have many open questions, but right now I think all of them are answered.
Signed Nix Astreides
If it works out, I am most certainly going to create a more complicated version of World of Agents (basically real world quality 3D) as I will have money to actually have done it.
Signed Nix Astreides
Btw in my products I think I have certain revelations how to destroy competition and occupy a very big chuck of all the trading in crypto. I think in a year or bit more I might become a billionaire through my coin $ASTRE. (Last time I predicted that I am going to become a millionaire, it actually happened btw 😂)
Signed Nix Astreides
But we will definitely see the universal income. The thing is I think it won’t be granted to you. It will be distributed among those who control corporations: either their descendants or those who bought it somehow.
Signed Nix Astreides
Maybe in future there will be kind of French revolutions, but it’s too far to predict yet. At least we should understand first how they would have done it.
Signed Nix Astreides
And I don’t think we will ever see “a better future”. I think it’s more like the corporative management can create this better future for themselves, while nomads will be slowly extinct (or integrated into the corporate system) sooner or later.
Signed Nix Astreides
But crime is created from conflict of no job usually. So it means while certain corporations can control either by force or by voluntary financial aid sometimes, they will tend to fix the reason why it was provoked in first place. That’s why I think after several civil wars there will be an order again which will more remind of feudal order. The corporation controls a certain territory (castle), enforces this control…
Signed Nix Astreides
So yeah, it’s going to be cyberpunk lol, but more direct. There will be no classical governments anymore.
Signed Nix Astreides
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @AstreidesAnalytics. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 408,524 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@AstreidesAnalytics named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Art of Prediction” (@AstreidesAnalytics), 2,090 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AstreidesAnalytics.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.