Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Requinoesis

@AstralRequin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

234subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001385145526
TypeChannel
Username@AstralRequin
DescriptionThe shark from outer space ✨☄️✨ https://linktr.ee/requinoesis
Created7 April 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/AstralRequin

Growth

2348 Aug 2026, 15:32 — 234 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 15:45 — 234 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 15:328 Aug 2026, 15:45
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 233–235 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 15:45234no change
8 Aug 2026, 15:32234first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 21 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.3%
avg views ÷ 234 subscribers
Avg views / post
82.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held19 (21 April 202626 July 2026)
Views total165
Reactions total26
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
598
Videos
46
Links
72

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
5m 15s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

111 reactions across 18 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 86.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9686.5%
🥰1513.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 111reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 20:55 UTC65 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

This is the full artwork for the third background concept experiment, drawing over the 3D model. This would be the Blue Lobby, the entrance to the Cerulean Tower of the Seven Waves residential, the home of my sharkfolk. 🏢🦈 For this scene, I improvised by filling it with several other residents instead of just Tiago and Roberto alone. I tried to portray that in this universe there are no 'maintenance services', the

8

22 Jul 2026, 00:34 UTC100 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

This Saturday I lost a friend, and today is his birthday. He was a dear friend whom I saw every day in our group of friends. He once told me that thanks to me, he began to see sharks in a much deeper way and said that the blue shark was his favorite. This is the first time I've lost a friend so suddenly like this, I'm still trying to process it... A few weeks ago he asked me to illustrate a blue shark for him to g

18

10 Jul 2026, 20:03 UTC110 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Versão pensada originalmente em portugues, foi um pequeno improviso de como pretendo fazer esta comic, espero que gostem! :) Quem vocês seriam nessa situação? Tiago que é o que fica lembrando os amigos ou Roberto que esquece tudo? hehe

6

10 Jul 2026, 20:02 UTC105 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

After my last background test, I wanted to try making a short animated comic scene. Just a short, random scene from the daily lives of my shark characters! 🦈✨ Which one are you? Tiago, who's always reminding his friends... or Roberto, who always forgets things?

4

5 Jul 2026, 23:49 UTC116 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

I finally found a little time to finish this other background design test, draw over on a 3D model. This place would be the "Blue Lobby", the entrance to the Cerulean Tower of Seven Waves, the home of my sharkfolk characters. ✨🏢🦈 If you want to see the complete version and the creation process in more detail, you can check out my Patreon to support me in some way! I'll post the complete version sometime in the fut

7

2 Jul 2026, 12:54 UTC128 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Today is my birthday. For the first time in a long while, I can honestly say it's a day that makes me happy! 🎂🦈✨

🥰15

15 Jun 2026, 22:45 UTC153 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Our three shark buddies love hanging out at Fintastic Snacks! 🥪🍤🍨🦈 What do you think they're talking about?

8

4 Jun 2026, 22:54 UTC148 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

Berto got lost again! It's ironic that he's a hammerhead shark with all his sensory prowess, but he can't find his way around his own apartment. 🦈💫

29 May 2026, 16:43 UTC164 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

In a distant post-Anthropocene future, after the rise of the sharkfolk civilization, a hammerhead shark named Roberto asks himself a question! 🦈💬

3

26 May 2026, 00:58 UTC142 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Another sketch I drew over the 3D model I made of Seven Waves. This place would be the North Hall, a path connecting the Amber and Coral Towers. Do my backgrounds look decent for the comic I plan to make? At some point in the future, I'll publish the complete artwork, but if you want to see it in advance and details of the creation process, you can check it out on Patreon if you'd like. https://www.patreon.com/pos

5

26 May 2026, 00:57 UTC97 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Here's a really bad video I made so you can see the model better. At some point I'll redo this drawing without the 3D model to make it look like a building map pamphlet or postcard.

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @AstralRequin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 897,915 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Requinoesis” (@AstralRequin), 234 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AstralRequin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.