Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DiDiSo

Channel

DiDiSo

@AssociazioneDiDiSo

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

302subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001601037016
TypeChannel
Username@AssociazioneDiDiSo
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/AssociazioneDiDiSo

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

301302301.57 August 2026 — 301 subscribers7 August 2026 — 301 subscribers6 September 2026 — 302 subscribers7 August 20266 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 31 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 301–302 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 21:36302+1
7 Aug 2026, 06:40301no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:30301first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

42 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏1331.0%
1228.6%
👍1023.8%
🙏614.3%
🤨12.38%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 10:53 UTC88 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Buongiorno, aggiungiamo una nota in merito al post di cui sopra. Siamo certi che, nel caso di contratto terminato, il presupposto per procedere, in futuro, in giudizio, sia la messa in mora. Non possiamo assicurare invece che, nel caso di contratto in essere, un giudice, chiamato su un ricorso futuro, non dica, se non viene inviata alcuna diffida, che è decorso il termine della prescrizione. Purtroppo abbiamo visto c

1👍1

31 Jul 2026, 16:45 UTC181 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Buongiorno a tutti. Ci avviciniamo ai 5 da quel fatidico 15 ottobre 2021. In quel momento parecchie persone sono rimaste a casa, perchè è stato impedito loro di erogare la propria prestazione lavorativa conformemente al contratto di lavoro sottoscritto, che non prevedeva un green pass come requisito. I requisiti contrattuali sono definiti nel momento della sottoscrizione del contratto, devono essere conformi all'ordi

3👍1

11 Jul 2026, 13:51 UTC414 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Buongiorno, rilevate le ripetute comunicazioni di istituti scolastici che richiedono documentazione relativa all'antitetanica, proponiamo una versione aggiornata del nostro documento. Abbiamo studiato tantissimo in questo periodo. Ciò ci ha reso consapevoli di passaggi giuridici, che sostengono ulteriormente quanto avevamo già scritto. Buon sabato di studio!

🙏6👍2

3 Jul 2026, 12:03 UTC460 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Visto l’interesse in questo ambito di rilievo in questo ultimo periodo, postiamo un “micro-corso” a cura di Alessandra Ghisla. Abbiamo condiviso e studiato assieme la linea relativa all’antitetanica a scuola e sul lavoro. Il tutto partendo dal fatto: - che il 3-bis del dl 73/2017 non esclude NESSUNO dal percorso formativo scolastico pratico, - che il dlgs 81/2008 (testo unico sulla sicurezza nei luoghi di lavoro) non

👍1

3 Jul 2026, 12:01 UTC211 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @tuteladirittosoggettivoPhoto

Per chi interessato verranno fornite tutte le informazioni via e-mail. Alessandra Ghisla - Consulente con studi di Diritti Naturali dell’Essere Umano e tecniche di difesa in Autotutela del Cittadino Italiano

19 Jun 2026, 05:26 UTC287 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Buongiorno! Appena ci proviamo a dare l’informazione che riteniamo giusta, anche solo per un confronto di crescita, veniamo censurati. Su un canale specifico, dove era stato messo il post della mozione sull’antitetanica a Bolzano, sia in lingua italiana che tedesca, abbiamo provato a postare in risposta le informazioni di cui sopra. Bene…siamo stati censurati più volte. All’inizio abbiamo pensato che fosse stato un e

👍1🤨1

16 Jun 2026, 15:25 UTC261 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Questa la mozione proposta in consiglio provinciale a Bolzano. Peccato che esista il dl 73/2017 convertito in legge 119 con il suo art. 3-bis nel quale non si prevede alcuna decadenza o sospensione per i ragazzi 6-16 che frequentano laboratori pratici a scuola. NESSUNA. Se un ragazzo viene “sospeso” dalle attività pratiche con giudizio finale di merito negativo non è perché lo dice una legge, ma per scelta discrezio

👏4👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AssociazioneDiDiSo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DiDiSo” (@AssociazioneDiDiSo), 302 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AssociazioneDiDiSo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.