Shunaqa gaplar do'stlar vaqtinchaga crypto bo'yicha savdolarni amalyotlarni to'xtatishni tavfisiya qilaman . cho'ntakni o'ylab halovatni yo'qotib qo'ymaylik Fatvo bo'yicha aniq habarni kutishimz kerak
🔥9

Channel
@AsrorbekCrypto
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
306subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 27 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002103846574 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AsrorbekCrypto |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 27 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AsrorbekCrypto |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 21:41 | 306 | -2 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 22:19 | 308 | -1 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 18:39 | 309 | -4 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 18:40 | 313 | +1 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 11:22 | 312 | no change |
| 27 Sept 2026, 10:47 | 312 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 11 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
41 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 27 | 65.9% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 34.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Shunaqa gaplar do'stlar vaqtinchaga crypto bo'yicha savdolarni amalyotlarni to'xtatishni tavfisiya qilaman . cho'ntakni o'ylab halovatni yo'qotib qo'ymaylik Fatvo bo'yicha aniq habarni kutishimz kerak
🔥9
Dr. Faraz Adam tomonidan yaqinda quyidagicha post va ilmiy ish taqdim qilindi. KRIPTOVALYUTA HALOLMI? — 124 SAHIFALIK SHARI’IY TADQIQOT Bir necha hafta avval Shayxul Islom Muftiy Taqiy Usmoniy (hafizahulloh) hazratlarining ko‘rsatmalariga binoan, Darul Uloom Karachi huzuridagi muhtaram Darul Iftaa qo‘mitasi meni raqamli aktivlarning shariatdagi tasnifi va ularga qanday hukm tatbiq etilishi haqidagi tadqiqotimni taq…
Shayx Muhammad Taqiy Usmoniyning pozitsiyasi shundan iboratki, ular nafaqat bugungi holatni, balki kriptoloyihalarning uzoq muddatli istiqboli, shaffofligi va iqtisodiy asoslarini ham hisobga olgan holda aksariyat kriptovalyutalarni joiz emas deb baholaydilar. Crypto Halal Office esa asosan har bir loyihaning hozirgi faoliyati, maqsadi va qo'llanilishiga qarab hukm beradi hamda kelajakdagi muvaffaqiyatiga kafolat be…
Shayx Muhammad Taqiy Usmoniyning kriptovalyutalarni joiz emas deb hisoblashining asosiy sabablari Shayx Muhammad Taqiy Usmoniy hazratlarining kriptovalyutalarni joiz emas deb hisoblashlari bir nechta asosiy dalillarga tayanadi. Ularning eng muhim e'tirozlaridan biri shuki, aksariyat kriptovalyutalar ortida real aktiv, davlat kafolati yoki aniq javobgar tashkilot mavjud emas. Real aktiv nima? Iqtisodiyotda har qan…
Assalom alaykum , Shayx Muhammad Taqiy Usmoniyning so‘nggi kriptovalyutalar haqidagi fatvolari nega katta muhokamalarga sabab bo‘ldi? Shayx Muhammad Taqiy Usmoniy kim? Xabaringiz bo‘lsa kerak, Pokistonlik olim Shayx Muhammad Taqiy Usmoniy kriptovalyutalar haqida qat'iy joiz emas degan qarashlarini yana bir bor bayon qildilar. Bu esa kripto treyderlar va investorlar orasida keng muhokamalarga sabab bo‘ldi. Shayx …
Kanal faoliyatni vaqtinchaga to'xtadim noma'lum muddatga !!! Rahmat hammalaringa 🫡🫡
👍5
Kanalimz oila a'zosi bo'lib qo'llab quvvatlab turganlaring uchun rahmat Uzr so'rayman sifatli kerakli kontent ulashalmay qoldim oxirigi payt
🔥9
Assalom alaykum
👍5
Trayder stop qo'ymadi , Bozor esa qaytmadi , O'jarlik yutdi ! O'zbekiston yutqazdi , Futbol tugadi 😢
🔥9
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Video, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @AsrorbekCrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Asrorbek |............ Trader” (@AsrorbekCrypto), 306 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AsrorbekCrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.