Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for آشتی خانه

Channel

آشتی خانه

@AshtiKhane

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

213subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002904252443
TypeChannel
Username@AshtiKhane
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded2 September 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/AshtiKhane

Growth

213216214.52 September 2026 — 216 subscribers2 September 2026 — 216 subscribers12 September 2026 — 213 subscribers2 September 202612 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 10 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 213–216 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 15:16213-3
2 Sept 2026, 20:45216no change
2 Sept 2026, 20:32216first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
65.3%
avg views ÷ 213 subscribers
Avg views / post
139
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held20 (16 February 202624 August 2026)
Views total139
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

161 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7043.5%
👏4729.2%
3723.0%
💔53.11%
😢21.24%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 161 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 February 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Feb 2026, 16:39 UTC197 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026

❤️ زیر بمباران تهران، به صلح فکر میکنم به آشتی به اینکه چه شد به ریل خشم، خشونت و مرگ افتادیم؟ آیا از ابتدا، راهی جز این نبود؟! این را تاریخ، پاسخ خواهد گفت و سیاستمداران به خدا.........

👍2

26 Feb 2026, 20:39 UTC252 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

■ کتاب راه حق ■ سوره جهان | صفحه ۹۸ ■ برگردان | رضا علوی

6

26 Feb 2026, 18:54 UTC207 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026

نگاه ما به ایران، بسیار «تهران زده» است فرآیند کنکور، به تدریج فقرا را از دانشگاه های برتر حذف کرده و رشته های برتر را در انحصار قشر ثروتمند جامعه قرار داده است.... سالهاست که دیگر دانشگاه های برتر، ساختار تولید اندیشه و فرهیختگی نیستند، بنگاه تولید مدرک هستند که عموما در قبضه ثروتمندان است و در خدمت تحکیم چرخه ظالمانه: پول بیشتر= آموزش بهتر= دوباره ثروت بیشتر

👏5👍2

26 Feb 2026, 18:48 UTC153 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026

حس شرم...... در این مدت، حجم فحش های رکیک جنسی که از دانشجویان در تجمعات شنیدم، عجیب بود! چیزی که بیش از همه ناراحتم می کرد، دختران دانشجویی بودند که بی هیچ احساس شرمی، رکیک ترین الفاظ جنسی را فریاد میزدند برخی از این الفاظ را، ما پسرها در جمع پسرانه مان هم خجالت میکشیم بگوییم، چه برسد به اینکه در ملأ عام فریاد بزنیم!! دو نکته در این مورد باید بگویم: یکی اینکه فحش های رکیک جنسی، کاملا «مرد سالار» و حاوی تحقیر «ز

👏9😢2

25 Feb 2026, 17:31 UTC186 views16 reactionsread 2 September 2026

🌹 من چشمانم «خاکستری بین» است ما ایرانی ها، قبل از اسلام، دنیا را به دو بخش تقسیم می کردیم: نور/ ظلمت اهورا مزدا/ اهریمن بعد از اسلام و وقایعی که در تاریخ اسلام پیش آمد، باز این فرهنگ در ما بیشتر تثبیت شد و اسمش را گذاشتیم: جبهه حق/ جبهه باطل حالا هر اتفاقی که در کشور می افتد، یقه ما را می گیرند و می‌گویند کدام طرفی؟! من، جز برخی موارد انگشت شمار در تاریخ، اکثر قریب به اتفاق وقایع و حتی نظرها و اندیشه ها را، خاک

👏97

24 Feb 2026, 18:12 UTC173 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026

این آخرین آمار رسمی از وضعیت جنسی دانش آموزان است که من دیده ام، متعلق به سال ۸۷! یعنی هفده سال قبل حالا وضعیت ۱۷ سال قبل را ببینید: ۷۴ درصد دوست پسر یا دوست دختر داشتند ۱۷.۵ درصد همجنسگرا بودند و احتمالا با همجنس رابطه داشتند ۸.۲ درصد خودارضایی می کردند این بچه های ما، با یک سبک زندگی ای بزرگ شدند که مسئولان ما نخواستند ببینند، بعد دانشجو شدند، با قوای نظامی در برابر سبک زندگی آنها ایستادند، بعد فحش شان دادند گ

👍76

24 Feb 2026, 18:11 UTC159 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026

دکتر نوید ادهم، از طراحان سند بنیادین تحول آموزش و پرورش است در یک جلسه ای، ایشان سند بنیادین را برای ما توضیح داد.... بعد از ارائه، من از ایشان سوالی پرسیدم: گفتم: آقای دکتر! در تمام این سند، هیچ حرفی از جایگاه مسأله جنسی در آموزش و پرورش نشده.... آمار مسائل جنسی در مدارس فاجعه است، بچه های ما کجا باید مفاهیم سلامت جنسی و مراقبت های جنسی را یاد بگیرند؟ ایشان جواب داد: حق با شما است، سند بنیادین تحول آموزش و پرور

💔4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AshtiKhane. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“آشتی خانه” (@AshtiKhane), 213 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AshtiKhane.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.