Channel
@Ascendance_Ego
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
78subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002265143410 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ascendance_Ego |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ascendance_Ego |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 78 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 76 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 76 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 13 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
32 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 62.5% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 18.8% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 6.25% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 6.25% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 6.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2025 to 8 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Явление малого мира (Small World Network) было формализовано в 1998 году Уоттсом и Строгацем, что стало прорывом в теории сложных сетей. Значимость этой модели определяется её способностью объединять свойства высокой кластеризации и малой средней длины пути. Нейронные и социальные структуры демонстрируют свойства малого мира даже при огромных масштабах. Адаптивность подобных сетей проявляется в их устойчивости к л…
❤6🔥4🫡2
И да не переживай дочитали до конца 🚬
❤1🤝1
Если помнишь я как то привадил такой пример представь тропу вокруг горы твой открытый ключи это конечная точка А закрытый ключ это то место от куда ты начал свой путь что бы узнать твой закрытый ключ нужно знать сколько n шагов ты сделал это и есть шифр Но основная загвоздка что у тебя на твоей круглой тропе вокруг горы есть точки а они говорят о наличии x и y это конкретное место в координате а тут мы убираем …
❤2
Слушай ну интересно 🤔 однако как будто опущен самый главный и важный момент Смотри, у обычных эллиптических кривых точка - это пара (x, y). Два числа, два риска. А здесь? Только x. Казалось бы окей, но Y зараза лишний. Его нужно или передавать (это +32 байта), или вычислять через квадратный корень в конечном поле. А извлекать корень - это всегда лотерея, где можно утечь по времени, по памяти, по побочным кана…
❤7🔥2
Об эллиптических кривых Хотелось бы вспомнить то, чего и не знали 🐺 Представьте 2^8 (если что ^ - это степень), м? Ответ: 256, считать надо было А вот 2^256 уже тяжелее. Есть такое простое число 2^255-19, а магия простых чисел используется в современной криптографии, и вот это число: 57896044618658097711785492504343953926634992332820282019728792003956564819949. Так вот, один Брайнштейн в 2006 году представил Curve…
❤2👍1
^Эта модель обеспечила до 1000 раз меньшие потери при обмене стейблкоинов по сравнению с Uniswap.
И немного улучшив нашу старую неэффективную модель. Мы получаем: A*(x-y)-D=D3/(x*y)) где A — параметр, регулирующий форму кривой, а D — суммарный резерв.
Вернемся к AMM. Тут то и начинает блистать Curve Finance (2020) Они ввели специализированные кривые для стейблкоинов, минимизирующие проскальзывание.
Меня просто беспокоить эти мысли, да и день сегодня такой. Все говорят про Израиль. Вот и я немного разбавил
Ну и скамы на этом не заканчиваются. Но знаете я не очень хочу превращаться в какой то сатирический журнал. Углубляться во всю эту историю.
236 сделок в день! Преступление это тяжелая работа.
Это показывает нам дело SEC против Джастина Схема торговли wash зависела, по крайней мере, от значительного объема TRX. Таким образом, Сан предоставил собственный TRX своей команде для содействия схеме торговли wash. 172. С около 18 апреля 2018 года по 11 февраля 2019 года команда Сана проводила сделки wash с TRX на торговой платформе, используя счета 16 и 17. В течение 249 дней, когда эти счета были активны, команд…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Ascendance_Ego. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 249,393 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ascendance of a Bookworm” (@Ascendance_Ego), 78 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ascendance_Ego.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.