Channel
@Asadbek_mafiya
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
29subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002080552960 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Asadbek_mafiya |
| Description | Shaxsiy qarashlar - Personal insights. |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Asadbek_mafiya |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 29 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:17 | 29 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
59 reactions across 16 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 17 | 28.8% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 13.6% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 10.2% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 8.47% | |
| 💘 | 4 | 6.78% | |
| 🗿 | 3 | 5.08% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 3.39% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 3.39% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 3.39% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 3.39% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 1.69% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 1.69% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.69% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.69% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.69% | |
| 😐 | 1 | 1.69% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 1.69% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 1.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 December 2025 to 14 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ko'pchilik dinga haddan tashqari suyanadi. Bu ba'zan qo'rqitadi, ba'zan esa asabga tegadi. Yomg'ir yog'ishini duo qilib so'rash borasida va buni amalga oshishi yoki amalga oshmasligi haqida odamlar bir-biri bilan tortishyapti. Mening qarashim har doim bir xil bo'lgan: Agar Xudo bo'lsa va aytilganidek qudratli bo'lsa, bunday mayda-chuyda yomg'ir yog'dirishlar bilan shug'ullanmasa keragov. Ba'zan, duo qilib so'ra dey…
❤2
https://t.me/gorizont_uz/58649 Bozordagi narx-navoni davlat tushirmasligi kerak
❤1🔥1
Ba'zan, yoshi 30-40 yoki undan kattalarni yoshlar buzilib ketdi, katta ishlar qilmayapti degan nidolarimi eshitib qolaman. To'g'ri, yoshlar daxshatli zo'r emasdir, garchi oramizda yaxshi natijaga erishayotganlar bo'lsa ham. Lekin, yoshi kattalarning bu nidolarini eshitib, nogahon bir naql esga tushadi: echki qo'y sakragan dumbasi ko'tarilib ketganinini ko'rib orqang ko'rindi deb kular ekan. Ya'ni, yoshi kattalarnin…
💯3❤1
https://t.me/gorizont_uz/58469 Men uchun arab xalifalardan ko'ra, shu kabi odamlar biz uchun qahramon bo'lish kerak.
❤1
15 million odamning shaxsiy ma'lumoti tarqab ketibdi. Bu ishni kim qildi, qilganlar bo'shatildimi, jarima to'ladimi, qamaldimi deb so'rashning o'rniga bo'lgan ish bo'ldi deyilmaydida.
❤1
Anov-manov odamlar muxlislik qilmaydi bizning jamoaga
👍1👎1🔥1
🇨🇳🏴 Хитой раҳбари Си Цзиньпин Англиянинг "Манчестер Юнайтед" клуби мухлиси эканлигини маьлум қилди. Батафсил Gorizontда...
🥱1😁1
🇺🇿🇷🇺 Суверен Ўзбекистоннинг мавжудлигини қабул қилиб бўлмайди – Александр Дугин “Рус дунёси” ғоясининг асосий мафкурачиси ҳамда Кремлга яқин кўриладиган файласуф собиқ СССР мустамлакалари, жумладан Марказий Осиё давлатлари суверенитетини инкор қилди. Унинг фикрича, Россия бу мамлакатларни “назоратга олиши керак”. “Ёки улар бизнинг ягона иттифоқимиз таркибига киради, ёки АҚШ ва Европа Иттифоқи учун плацдармга айлана…
❤1👎1
Xusanoviga qo'shib yutib tashladiku. Hehe
Ижтимоий фаол фуқаро Дональд Трамп устидан “102”га шикоят қилибди. @o'ylashimcha
https://t.me/stratfocusmena/2133 Ikkinchi unchalik ham yoqtirmaydigan xalqim bu - arablar. To'g'ri, islom dini shu yerdan kelib chiqqan. Lekin, ko'pchilik osmonlarga ko'taradigan darajada avliyo emas ular. Qarang, bir-biri bilan hech kelishmaydi. O'zi islom markazi - Saudiya Arabistoni emas, O'zbekiston bo'lishi kerak, Samarqandmi?
🔥2❤1🍓1👏1
Bugun ham ikkitasini topib oldim. O'rtadagi ayolga o'xshar ekan.
🤔2🤨2❤🔥1💘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Asadbek_mafiya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,049,422 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Asadbek Mardanov” (@Asadbek_mafiya), 29 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Asadbek_mafiya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.