Channel
@Arumdiary
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
323subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002746617343 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Arumdiary |
| Description | Личные заметки @i_starko о парфюмерии: находки, винтаж и новости. Понюхаем? |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 31 August 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Arumdiary |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 323 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:19 | 323 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (13 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,731 |
| Reactions total | 81 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 21:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
111 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 59 | 53.2% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 15.3% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 11.7% | |
| ✍ | 12 | 10.8% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 3.60% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 2.70% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.80% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.901% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 111reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Arumdiary. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Долго собиралась с духом, чтобы описать коллекцию Khaikin, состоящую из трёх ароматов. Но когда, если не сейчас? "Крах гедонизма" самый тяжёлый из всех. Громкое горелое дерево, настолько плотное, что кажется, вот-вот начнёшь задыхаться, кожа… а потом, к сожалению, появляется амбродерево. "Нарциссовая роща" собирательный, летящий аромат на тему нарциссов, анималистичного жасмина и немного застоявшейся воды в вазе. С…
❤5👍4✍2
Вот это интересно. Пишут, что Frédéric Malle собирается переиздавать аромат Dries Van Noten 2013 года под новым названием Northern Love. Парфюмер тот же – Бруно Йованович. В основных нотах: • шафран • жасмин, сандал • ваниль, синтетическая молекула сакрасол Кто-нибудь пробовал оригинальный Dries Van Noten par Frédéric Malle? Я давно охочусь за этой снятостью, но отзывы слишком противоречивые, чтобы покупать вслепую…
🔥6❤2🥰2👏1
"Run, don't walk" или Harrods открыли предпродажу адвент-календарей. Через сколько раскупили парфюмерный? Меньше, чем за час… Ну что, на этот раз я успела, чему очень рада. Но торопилась так, что сделала небольшую ошибку в своем адресе, надеюсь, все дойдет. Осталось дождаться сентября, когда их начнут рассылать
❤9🔥6🏆1👏1
У Le Labo выходит новый городской эксклюзив Shiu 25, посвящённый Пекину. Композиция состоит из нот камфорного дерева, розового перца, ириса и ладана. В августе и сентябре в официальных бутиках бренда можно будет найти все городские эксклюзивы. В остальное время года каждый из них продаётся только в городе "по прописке". Про всю эту линейку я писала вот тут. Зная себя, уже в эту субботу пойду искать новинку
❤8✍3👍2
Попробовала вчера лимитированную овощную коллекцию от Jo Malone. 🔴 Scarlet Beetroot свёклу я здесь, честно говоря, не почувствовала. Для меня это скорее сладкая смородиновая конфета с лёгкой фруктовой кислинкой, что-то в духе конфетки Bon Pari. 🟠 Carrot Blossom активные мускусы и немного варёной моркови. Звучит необычно, но со временем замыливается и появляется аккорд апельсиновых цветов. 🟡 Velvety Butternut имбир…
❤12👍2🔥2
красивые съёмки флаконов от Zara
❤9👍2👏2
Аромовый дневник pinned a photo
Harrods решили красиво шагнуть во вторую половину лета и уже анонсировали парфюмерный адвент-календарь. Я рассказывала, что в прошлом году на официальном сайте календарь от этого универмага был стремительно распродан. Ну что сказать, не смотря на несколько спорных окошек, я буду пытаться его поймать в этом году. К тому же внутри будут два эксклюзива (Ex Nihilo и Memo), которые выпущены специально для Harrods, поэтом…
✍7❤6🔥3
Дизайн парфюмерных пространств вызывает моё отдельное любопытство. На фото флагманский Predubezhdai. Что касается самих композиций, какого-то моего большого интереса они не вызвали. Но кто знает, это молодой и очень уверенный в себе бренд. Да и за работой его прекрасных маркетологов хочется следить
❤8👀3👍3
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @Arumdiary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 181,939 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Аромовый дневник” (@Arumdiary), 323 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Arumdiary.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.