Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Артур Алексанян

Channel

Артур Алексанян

@ArturAlexanian

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

177subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001737467945
TypeChannel
Username@ArturAlexanian
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ArturAlexanian

Growth

1751771767 August 2026 — 175 subscribers8 August 2026 — 175 subscribers14 August 2026 — 177 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 175–177 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 19:26177+2
8 Aug 2026, 14:02175no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:08175first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 03s
Average length
3m 21s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

242 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍10041.3%
🔥4217.4%
💯3414.0%
2811.6%
👏239.50%
🥰41.65%
🆒31.24%
👀31.24%
👌20.826%
10.413%
😁10.413%
🤝10.413%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 242reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 October 2025 to 17 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
94
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 20 we hold a reading for · 75%
Most on one post
13
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ArturAlexanian. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 October 2025 to 17 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Apr 2026, 08:41 UTC117 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤝Друзья, важнейшая тема для родителей и детей. ⚠️⚠️⚠️ 🙉Заболеваемость психическими расстройствами среди подростков 15–17 лет выросла на 53% за 10 лет, следует из данных Росстата. В ряде региональных минздравов эту тенденцию подтвердили. ➡️Эксперты связывают увеличение числа диагнозов в том числе с улучшением диагностики и растущей настороженностью общества в отношении психического состояния несовершеннолетних. 📌До

15 Feb 2026, 14:54 UTC215 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Друзья, чтобы нам не потеряться и оставаться на связи, создал этот же канал в MAX✊️🤝 https://max.ru/join/I5Zrdt12BMS4GFXvndm_SIbHngwW6v0uK63amxQe31g

👍5🔥2🥰2🤝1

2 Feb 2026, 18:04 UTC283 views15 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AALUKASHVideo

🔵 Продолжаем разговор - угрозы и возможности Интернета для детей Интернет это сфера повышенной опасности - и это не паранойя, не теория заговора, не моральная паника. Подробности в видео, здесь - ключевое. Дорога — опасная среда? Давайте бояться дороги, падать в обморок, когда мимо пронесся грузовик? Нет, конечно. Есть правила дорожного движения. Если вы хотите стать водителем, вы должны сдать экзамен. Если вы п

🔥9👍3👏2😁1

29 Jan 2026, 13:47 UTC211 views16 reactions13 Starsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AALUKASHVideo

🔵 «Интернет-пространство влияния» - опасности для детей Раньше основным пространством влияния на ребёнка были семья, школа, двор. Но сила и яркость информационных сигналов в сети способна «отодвинуть» реальность на второй план. Дети — особая аудитория для этого влияния. У них только формируется мозг, критическое мышление еще не развито. Ребёнком правят эмоции и впечатления, а не анализ. Этим пользуются создател

🔥63👍3💯3🆒1

29 Jan 2026, 11:19 UTC186 views11 reactions13 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«Звёздочная система»: Почему внешняя мотивация пятёрками может быть опасной для обучения и личности ребёнка Коллеги-педагоги, уважаемые родители! В поисках инструментов для повышения успеваемости многие школы и отдельные учителя внедряют систему внешней мотивации: за каждую пятёрку ученик получает «звёздочку», балл или жетон, которые позже можно обменять на привилегии, подарки или дополнительные оценки. На первый в

👍5💯3👏21

28 Jan 2026, 13:07 UTC182 views12 reactions8 Starsread 8 August 2026
Poll

«Звёздочки» за пятёрки — хорошая мотивация? Всё чаще в школах используют систему внешней мотивации Как вы относитесь к системе «звёздочек» за пятёрки?

  1. Положительно, это хороший стимул для детей48%
  2. Отрицательно, это портит внутреннюю мотивацию33%
  3. Затрудняюсь ответить / Мне всё равно19%
  4. Свой вариант (напишите в комментариях)0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👏5👀3👍3🔥1

21 Jan 2026, 09:14 UTC≈1,870 views21 reactions12 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🫟Почему нашим детям тяжело !? Мир ребенка в СССР был, условно говоря, архитектурным. 🫟Единые правила: Общие программы, четкая идеология, предсказуемые социальные лифты (октябренок -> пионер -> комсомолец). 🫟 Внешний авторитет: Учитель, родитель, партия — были непререкаемыми источниками истины. 🫟 Дефицит информации и общения: Круг общения был географически ограничен (двор, школа, район). Информация была редким товаро

👍9🔥5💯32👏2

21 Jan 2026, 07:17 UTC216 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Друзья , вы испытываете трудности в воспитании детей ?

  1. Мне не понятно, как сегодня нужно правильно заниматься процессом воспитания ребёнка17%
  2. Нет у меня всё отлично, понимаю и знаю как воспитывать10%
  3. Дополнительная информация никогда не будет лишней72%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍3💯3👌1👏1🆒1

15 Jan 2026, 19:37 UTC260 views15 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @AALUKASHPhoto

🔵 Почему нам сегодня так тяжело? Как изменился мир — и как в нём выжить Раньше жизнь была проще. Были чёткие правила, стабильные работы, понятные ценности. Мир был предсказуемым: если учился хорошо — получал профессию, работал 40 лет — уходил на пенсию. Это был мир SPOD: Stable (стабильный), Predictable (предсказуемый), Ordinary (обычный), Definite (определённый). С конца XX века всё начало рушиться. Сначала мир

👍10👏3🔥2

23 Dec 2025, 12:57 UTC254 views11 reactions7 Starsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍5🔥3💯2👏1

23 Dec 2025, 09:19 UTC210 viewsread 8 August 2026

Друзья, наиважнейшая информация для всех РОДителей !

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ArturAlexanian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jan 2026, 13:07 UTCAnonymous Poll27 voters

«Звёздочки» за пятёрки — хорошая мотивация? Всё чаще в школах используют систему внешней мотивации Как вы относитесь к системе «звёздочек» за пятёрки?

  1. Положительно, это хороший стимул для детей48%
  2. Отрицательно, это портит внутреннюю мотивацию33%
  3. Затрудняюсь ответить / Мне всё равно19%
  4. Свой вариант (напишите в комментариях)0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Jan 2026, 07:17 UTCAnonymous Poll29 voters

Друзья , вы испытываете трудности в воспитании детей ?

  1. Мне не понятно, как сегодня нужно правильно заниматься процессом воспитания ребёнка17%
  2. Нет у меня всё отлично, понимаю и знаю как воспитывать10%
  3. Дополнительная информация никогда не будет лишней72%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Oct 2025, 12:29 UTCAnonymous Poll21 voters

Друзья, подготовил статью и хочу перед тем как Вам её представить, поинтересоваться Вашим мнением. Абьюз и толерантность это

  1. Какие-то чужие и не очень понятные слова29%
  2. Эти слова имеют важный смысл и появление в нашей жизни этих новых слов очень помогает обществу38%
  3. Опасность от этих слов и их значений33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 October 2025 to 17 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Артур Алексанян” (@ArturAlexanian), 177 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ArturAlexanian.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.