6-7 иксов было на атн, щас тоже нормально
Signed Artem

Channel
@ArtemEthereumBtc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
318subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001721492017 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ArtemEthereumBtc |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ArtemEthereumBtc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:10 | 318 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 318 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 8 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
39 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 14 | 35.9% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 15.4% | |
| 🤝 | 6 | 15.4% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 10.3% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 10.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 7.69% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 5.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2025 to 8 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ArtemEthereumBtc. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 May 2025 to 8 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
6-7 иксов было на атн, щас тоже нормально
Signed Artem
Легкие 50% ДАЛЬШЕ - БОЛЬШЕ 🔥
Signed Artem
0.15 газ!
Signed Artem
All in
Signed Artem
Пошел движ на второй коллекции для агентов https://magiceden.io/marketplace/shellborn_ Ее пушат (пока что soft shill) пару хороших акков в Х, чел из metaplex и второй из helius 10к сапплай флор 0.08, мне тут арт лично больше нравится чем у Claws и буд-то бы больше подходит для нарратива Разница в мкапе больше 10х, так что думаю есть куда расти. При условии, что первая коллекция не сдохнет и пойдет дальше то это б…
Signed Artem
Photo, posted without a caption
🤣9
Signed Artem
Новый интерфейс байбита завезли
🤣5
Signed Artem
все сюда зарядили? Новый сейл легион х кракен (если вдруг кто не видел) 1/5 токенов выделено на стандартный сейл легиона по форме 4/5 - фкфс, если не повезет на легионе - пойду на кракен брать ручками, надеюсь там ботов будет меньше ноубрейн мув, не скипайте всем удачи!
👍2
Signed Artem
А эфирчик то твой растет 🤝
Signed Artem
Ламбо, Феррари или 120 квадратов нахуй? 🙂↕️
Signed Artem
Кто не верил суки 🙂↕️🤝
❤🔥3
Signed Artem
У кого-то есть абхазская мафия? 😀 Отпишите
Signed Artem
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ArtemEthereumBtc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OKX lover” (@ArtemEthereumBtc), 318 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ArtemEthereumBtc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.