💫 ГИД В МИРЕ КРЕАТИВА: рекламные тренды, стратегии продвижения и личностного роста
Будь в курсе, вдохновляйся и побеждай!
🌐 Темы блога:
☆Печатная Реклама ♡Интернет-маркетинг ☆Новые технологии ♡Ресурсное состояние
📲 @EvrikaDigital - Власова Елена
Created
Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 444–446 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 05:04
445
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:10
445
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 19 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.7%
avg views ÷ 445 subscribers
Avg views / post
52.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
13.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 July 2026
Posts held
17 (19 March 2025 – 25 July 2026)
Views total
52
Reactions total
7
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 05:04 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
110
Videos
36
Links
97
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
5m 40s
Average length
1m 53s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
518 reactions across 17 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
153
29.5%
❤
149
28.8%
👍
120
23.2%
✍
14
2.70%
🥰
13
2.51%
👏
10
1.93%
🎉
9
1.74%
💯
9
1.74%
🕊
9
1.74%
🤣
9
1.74%
👌
7
1.35%
🤝
7
1.35%
⚡
4
0.772%
🦄
3
0.579%
🍾
2
0.386%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 518reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2025 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 17 we hold a reading for · 82%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ArtProdigy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 March 2025 to 25 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
5.88%
1 of 17 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
52.0
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
262
over 16 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2025 to 25 July 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Внимание к деталям:
как Додо Пицца превратила QR-код в элемент декора
В основном, исходя из моей практики, чаще всего бренды размещают QR-коды для соцсетей на визитках и листовках. И да, это работает.
Но меня сильнее цепляет креативный подход к задачам.
Вчера зашла в Додо и сразу обратила внимание на это стильное решение: QR-код, как картина, в раме на стене.
Казалось бы, мелочь, но это работает сразу на три фронт…
Я все же записалась в Терру)).
Кому интересно, кто такая или что такое Терра, пишите в личку, поделюсь)).
И я даже немного выпала из своего любимого телеграм-канала (ВРЕМЕННО, РАЗУМЕЕТСЯ!)) и очень по нему скучала).
Бывают моменты, когда необходимо держать фокус на чем-то одном и ни на что другое не переключаться. Тогда вы получите максимальный результат.
Столь значимые события, как вступление в Анамалию Михаила Г…
Поздравляю всех моих любимых подписчиков с Пасхой и от души желаю верить во всё хорошее, мечтать, творить добро, дарить окружающим любовь и получать в ответ искренность!
Желаю мира
и счастья в этом мире!
Христос Воскресе! 🥚🥚🥚
🌞 🚩🚩🚩🚩🧁
Наверное, многие из нас слышали, как люди говорят: «Христос воскрес» вместо «Христос воскресе», особенно в разговорной речи.
Это вызывает у некоторых сомнения:
а как же правил…
ПРОБИВАЕМ ПОТОЛОК!
Помните, в предыдущем посте я писала о перезагрузке и обновлении?
Моим любимым заказчикам сразу скажу - волноваться не нужно.
Я и реклама неразлучны уже более 20 лет, с того самого момента, как я закончила отделение Дизайна и Рекламы.
ЭТО НЕЗЫБЛЕМО. И ТОЧКА.
Полиграфисты меня поймут. Стоит попасть в эту нишу и это любовь навсегда)).
А зачем тогда я вечно куда-то щемлюсь?
Ну, во-первых, одно из…
🎥 ПОЙМАЙ МЕНЯ, ЕСЛИ СМОЖЕШЬ – воскресный киношедевр для вас ⚡️
Леонардо Ди Каприо и Том Хэнкс
в захватывающей дуэли преступника и сыщика. Фильм основан на реальных событиях, всё как я люблю)).
На фото - Стивен Спилберг, Фрэнк Абигнейл и Леонардо Ди Каприо.
▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️▪️
Молодой гений афер водил за нос ФБР, подделывал чеки на миллионы и выдавал себя за пилота, врача и юриста… и всё это в возрасте до 19 ле…
У МЕНЯ ПЕРЕЗАГРУЗКА! ⏳ 👨💻
⬇️⬇️⬇️
Запланировала и приступила к апгрейду - от своей собственной рекламы (наконец-то) и интерьера офиса (кайф!) до новых проектов моей студии и мировоззрения в целом!))
Ребят, ну не сидится мне спокойно.
Впрочем, это у меня с самого детства.. Мама мне не зря повторяла, что у меня шило в .. месте) 😉
Диагноз - шилопопость хроническая.)
Помнится, мама меня часто спрашивала:
- Лена, ну всп…
❤️🩹 КОГДА ЛАЙКИ ПРЕВРАЩАЮТСЯ В БОЛЬ
О том, как смартфон незаметно разрушает твою шею. Читаем и сохраняем!!!
🔻🔻🔻
Тот случай, когда все всё понимают, но ничего не выполняют. Пока не прижмет.
Так на днях случилось и у моей коллеги. Сейчас ей уже лучше, ттт!
Не задумывались? Наша с вами головушка весит, как кирпич.
Попробуй взять в вытянутую руку кирпич и так подержать.
Ну как, долго продержал? Как рука?
А теперь зад…
ЖЕНИЛИ И МЕНЯ НЕ СПРОСИЛИ!
НУ ВОТ КАК ТАК МОЖНО, ААА?
Ну что, ребят, вы все еще думаете, нужен ли вам телеграм-канал и другие платформы для продвижения?
Правильно! Продолжайте думать!))
А я пост дописываю сейчас и на пляжик в Дубае, по берегу гулять!))
Заметили, наверное, рекламу под моими постами?
Вот она, безбедная жиза! 😂
Деньги в карман рекой текут). Не успеваю их по банкам от огурцов распихивать!
Хотите такж…
И ЭТО НЕ ШУТКА! СЕРЬЁЗНО! 🎁🎁🎁
Я выиграла приз 1 апреля?? Да! 😅
Друзья, как думаете, почему так радуюсь и что это за подарок?)))
⬇️
Расскажу и покажу!)
Это было обычное утро вторника..
На календаре - 1 апреля.
Но уже с утра побаливала голова, а настроение было не ахтишное.
Единственное, что меня окрылило перед выходом на работу, так это новый пост, написанный мною в творческом порыве и снова не по формулам...охх уж …
Заглянула тут на днях на госуслуги... предполагаемая пенсия ~13817.6 руб... при непрерывном стаже 25 годков, как вам?
Кстати, это не первоапрельская шутка. Это наши реалии.
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
И знаете... соцсети тоже ведь
НАШ АКТИВ, ИНВЕСТИЦИЯ В ЗАВТРАШНИЙ ДЕНЬ. 💰 ⛏ 💻
〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️〰️
Разумеется, такие активы, как облигации, акции, недвижку и др, мы не исключаем.
Все уже слышали, что нельзя складывать яйца …
📹 Вдохновляемся кинематографом))
Если ты уже нагулялся под весенними лучами солнца и думаешь, что бы посмотреть в выходные, предлагаю парочку моих любимых фильмов на тему пиара и маркетинга📆
🧿 Можешь выбрать один фильм или посмотреть оба, если затянет!)
Эти фильмы не только развлекут, но и дадут пищу для размышлений в развитии любимого дела или хобби!
Заказывай пиццу, устраивайся поудобнее и наполняйся идеями и кре…
✍️ ПИШИ, ЧТОБЫ ДЕЛИЛИСЬ! ✏️
5 секретов написания постов, которыми захотят делиться даже конкуренты 👩💻
1️⃣ Начните пост с интриги, а не с "Доброе утро, друзья!" или "Чудесная погодка, не правда ли?"
Если ваш пост начинается как утренняя планерка в офисе, единственное, чем поделятся читатели - это зевком. Лучше начните с "Вчера я случайно подслушал разговор двух маркетологов в туалете офисного центра и узнал секрет…
👍11🔥10❤7💯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ArtProdigy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ArtProdigy named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@artprodigyprais named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
