Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Arizona Conservatives Take Action

@ArizonaConservatives

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,778subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001425704944
TypeChannel
Username@ArizonaConservatives
Created9 February 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ArizonaConservatives

Growth

3,7783,7863,7826 August 2026 — 3,786 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,786 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,784 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,778 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 4 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,777–3,787 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 03:203,778-6
6 Aug 2026, 19:103,784-2
6 Aug 2026, 10:483,786no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:513,786first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 15 June 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
16m 49s
Average length
4m 12s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

530 reactions across 16 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍12423.4%
🔥11321.3%
9918.7%
🙏397.36%
🤬387.17%
👏346.42%
💩336.23%
😱275.09%
🤡81.51%
👎50.943%
🤯40.755%
😁30.566%
😡10.189%
🥰10.189%
🥴10.189%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 530reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2023 to 2 August 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2023, 16:33 UTC≈11,200 views49 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

HEADLINE: Phoenix light rail extensions move forward despite gutted funding in new Proposition 400 —————— If you hear someone say that the rushed $20B+ Prop 400 tax “banned light rail expansions”… It didn’t. It funded billions more of your money into new light rail expansions by helping cities pay for it by other means. Thank you to all of the members of the Arizona Freedom Caucus and our conservative colleagues

28👍9🤬8👎2🥰1😡1

1 Jul 2023, 05:22 UTC≈6,430 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @azblade

A list of Independence Day celebrations in Arizona. Don't let The Left steal your joy! https://arizonadailyindependent.com/2023/06/28/july-4th-celebrations-across-arizona-set-to-commemorate-independence-day/

26👍4👎2

1 Jul 2023, 05:16 UTC≈4,510 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @WILFMosederPhoto

🚨Kari Lake scores MAJOR victory in court! Judge allows her case to go forward against County Recorder Stephen Richer! Lake filed her complaint in an effort to review the mail in ballot affidavit signatures. 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 “Maricopa County Superior Court Judge John Hannah on Monday partially denied Maricopa County’s Motion to Dismiss Kari Lake’s lawsuit against Maricopa County for 2022 mail-in ballot affidavit envelop

🙏395👍2

1 Jul 2023, 05:16 UTC≈2,770 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @WILFMosederPhoto

🚨Maricopa Board Of Supervisors Just Pulled A Fast One! All 5 supervisors just unanimously re-elected Scott Jarrett to serve as Election Director, and appointed him a new boss! You may remember Jarrett as the man who contradicted himself under oath during Kari Lake’s trial regarding 19-inch ballot images. Jarrett is also the likely culprit behind the 60% machine failures on Election Day. Jarrett was just re-elected

🤬302🔥2

1 Jul 2023, 05:11 UTC≈1,880 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @behizyVideo

Tucker is getting increasingly closer to taking the election fraud red pill

🔥20👏1

1 Jul 2023, 05:08 UTC≈1,790 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @WILFMosederPhoto

BREAKING: Pinal County AZ Elections Director Geraldine Roll abruptly QUITS, claiming she has been the subject of ridicule, disrespect, intimidation and attacks on her reputation... This makes her the third election director to leave in less than a year! Pinal County sent 63,000 early ballots with errors in the primaries, ran out of ballots in at least 20 vote centers, failed to count HUNDREDS of ballots, and BOTCHED

👍28😁3

28 Jun 2023, 06:21 UTC≈2,180 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @WILFMosederPhoto

🚨BREAKING: GOP releases a SECOND WhatsApp message from Hunter Biden! August 3, 2017, Hunter tells CEFC associate Gongwen Dong: “The Biden’s are the best I know at doing exactly what the Chairman wants from this [partnership].” The next day Hunter received $100,000 from CEFC. The very same CCP linked energy company that held 10% for the Big Guy! Retweet: https://twitter.com/thenickymo/status/1673834596746555394?s=4

🔥13😱7

28 Jun 2023, 06:21 UTC≈1,560 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @WILFMoseder

James O’Keefe just said 60% of the ActBlue donations they’ve investigated appear to be coming from China 🇨🇳 You won’t hear that on CNN!

😱20👏5

28 Jun 2023, 06:21 UTC≈1,530 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @OKeefeMediaGroupVideo

FEC story Update: Lawsuit alleging Chinese ties to ActBlue scheme pending in Washington D.C. @OKeefeMediaGroup

🔥27👍10

27 Jun 2023, 14:51 UTC≈1,600 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @WILFMosederVideo

🚨BREAKING: MASSIVE Discrepancy Discovered in AZ 2022 Election! Retweet: https://twitter.com/thenickymo/status/1673699145691942917?s=46&t=Vpf6jLJQFTvaYjesJGjIAQ

👍35

27 Jun 2023, 14:51 UTC≈1,450 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @WILFMosederPhoto

🚨BREAKING: AFPI found 8,241 more ballots counted than voters that actually voted in the AZ midterm election... "An analysis was conducted of the total number of ballots counted in the 2022 Arizona general election compared to the number of registered voters. A potential 8,241-vote discrepancy was discovered between the total number of registered voters listed as voting and the total number of ballots counted in th

👍315🤯4

24 Jun 2023, 05:28 UTC≈1,870 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @WILFMosederPhoto

Help me put this clown in his place! Link to tweet! 👇🏻 https://twitter.com/thenickymo/status/1672200374923476996?s=46&t=Vpf6jLJQFTvaYjesJGjIAQ

28🔥14

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ArizonaConservatives. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 447,830 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Arizona Conservatives Take Action” (@ArizonaConservatives), 3,778 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ArizonaConservatives.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.