Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 7 of the 7 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 18 September 2026 to 25 September 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @avipip67. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
7 measurements spanning 47 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 446–452 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 08:05
451
+1
3 Nov 2026, 15:26
450
+3
21 Oct 2026, 00:15
447
-2
14 Oct 2026, 02:01
449
+2
4 Oct 2026, 12:59
447
-4
26 Sept 2026, 12:22
451
no change
26 Sept 2026, 11:47
451
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 18 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
16s
Average length
16s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
100 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
72
72.0%
😢
14
14.0%
🤬
7
7.00%
🙏
4
4.00%
👏
2
2.00%
👍
1
1.00%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 September 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ArielShimonaEdithP. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 September 2026 to 25 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🇮🇱 STATO DI ISRAELE: FORTEZZA INESPUGNABILE O FRAGILE SUKKAH ?
di Rav Aviad Gadot
LA SICUREZZA DELLO STATO DI ISRAELE – DAL CHILUL HASHEM AL KIDDUSH HASHEM
Negli ultimi tre anni, nel mezzo della tempesta della guerra che ci è stata imposta, siamo testimoni di un processo straordinario.
Dal terribile punto di abisso di Shemini Atzeret — «Le vostre città sono state bruciate dal fuoco... desolazione come dopo una dev…
Nel Talmud (Sukkah 11b), Rabbi Eliezer sostiene che Israele abitò nel deserto sotto le Ananei HaKavod, le Nuvole della Gloria, mentre Rabbi Akiva sostiene che Israele abitò in vere e proprie sukkot.
Rashi e Ramban scrivono che l’interpretazione più semplice del versetto «poiché nelle sukkot vi ho fatto abitare» è proprio quella delle Nuvole della Gloria.
Nel deserto Israele viveva sotto una provvidenza divina mirac…
🇮🇱 Stato di Israele: fortezza inespugnabile o sukkah?
In vista di Shabbat e dell'ingresso di Sukkot, condivido una riflessione di Rav Aviad Gadot, direttore generale dell'organizzazione Chotam, sul rapporto tra sicurezza di Israele, identità ebraica, forza nazionale e fiducia in HaShem.
Una domanda attraversa tutto il testo: può una nazione costruire la propria sicurezza soltanto attraverso la forza materiale, oppur…
Voce dalla Fattoria
Assaggiamo lo zucchero d'uva
alla vigilia di Rosh Hashanah,
prepariamo il vino
a Motzaei Kippur,
vendiamo l'uva in un vigneto a Chol HaMoed Sukkot,
pascoliamo le pecore in un giorno di festa...
Santità.
Tra i rami sulle nostre teste,
raccolti nei palmi delle nostre mani,
mescolati nella cantina,
e le loro bandiere sono piene d'amore.
Crescendo.
Maturando.
Raccolti.
Sulla vite.
Al pascolo.
…
IL DISCORSO INTEGRALE Di BENJAMIN NETANYAHU ALL'ASSEMBLEA GENERALE DELLE NAZIONI UNITE
"Signor Presidente, prima di cominciare, vorrei fare soltanto un breve annuncio. Se in quest’aula ci sono altri codardi morali che non se ne sono ancora andati, vi prego di farlo adesso. Grazie mille.
Signore e signori, 14 anni fa mi trovavo su questo podio e tracciai una linea rossa. Promisi che avrei impedito alla dittatura as…
“Bibi”, disse. “Bibi, che cosa ci fai qui?”. Corremmo l’uno incontro all’altro e ci abbracciammo.
E davanti a una tazza di caffè militare preparato alla meglio, gli rivolsi la domanda che avevo in mente, la domanda che tutti avevano in mente. “Allora, Yoni”, gli dissi, “che cosa succederà?”.
Lui si fermò un istante, poi disse qualcosa che non dimenticherò mai.
“Vinceremo”, disse. “Non abbiamo altra scelta”.
Ricord…
E indovinate che fine ha fatto la maggior parte del suo immenso arsenale di 150.000 missili balistici e razzi, tutti puntati contro i nostri civili? Non ci sono più. I leader di Hezbollah? Morti.
Il loro spirito? Spezzato. Gli arciterroristi, i peggiori assassini di massa sulla faccia della Terra, responsabili dell’uccisione non soltanto di israeliani, ma anche di americani, britannici e cittadini di decine di Paesi:…
Decenni fa aveva capito che, se nessuno li avesse fermati, gli ayatollah fanatici che inneggiano alla morte dell’America e alla morte di Israele avrebbero finito per realizzare le loro folli fantasie. Così Israele e America hanno agito insieme, non soltanto per proteggere noi stessi, ma per salvare la civiltà. Coraggiosi piloti americani, insieme a coraggiosi piloti israeliani, hanno condotto missioni congiunte nei c…
Ci vorrà tempo. Ci vorrà tempo per sconfiggere le menzogne. Ci vorrà tempo perché il mondo riconosca ciò che è così evidente: che Hamas usa i civili palestinesi come scudi umani; che usa ospedali, scuole e moschee come centri di comando terroristici; che ha rubato gran parte del cibo che abbiamo fatto entrare a Gaza. E mentre Hamas ha fatto tutto il possibile per mantenere i civili palestinesi in pericolo, spesso sot…
Sono stati aggrediti a Los Angeles, Londra, Parigi, Berlino, Washington D.C. Gli antisemiti di tutto il mondo vogliono terrorizzare il nostro popolo.
Ho una notizia per loro: i tempi in cui gli ebrei erano vittime indifese, condotte al macello, quei tempi sono finiti!
Oggi abbiamo uno Stato.
Oggi abbiamo un esercito.
Oggi abbiamo un popolo pronto e determinato a difendersi.
Perciò oggi, oggi ho un messaggio per gl…
E non avete detto nulla sull’Iran. Proprio adesso, non avete detto nulla sull’Iran.
Ma voglio darvi una buona notizia. Nonostante il vostro silenzio, nonostante la vostra ipocrisia, è soltanto questione di tempo prima che in Iran accada qualcosa di incredibile. Il potere del popolo prevarrà su chi detiene il potere. Voglio che ascoltiate attentamente le mie parole. Un giorno, e potrebbe non essere molto lontano, il …
❤8
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ArielShimonaEdithP. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Lion Udler @LionUdler · 20,264 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 September 2026
Documenting Israel @DocumentingIsrael · 20,410 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ariel Shimona Edith "Sono Sionista"” (@ArielShimonaEdithP), 451 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ArielShimonaEdithP.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
