Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

[#𝘼𝙜]°𝓐𝗿𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝓟𝗼𝗿𝘁 °ᵈᵏᵐ | Дизайнер

@ArgentumPort

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

189subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003786391676
TypeChannel
Username@ArgentumPort
Description𝖲𝗍𝖺𝗋𝗍: 28.02.2026 𝖮𝗐𝗇: 𝖠𝗋𝗀𝖾𝗇𝗍𝗎𝗆 / 𝖲𝗂𝗅𝗏𝖾𝗋 (𝖲𝗁𝖾/𝗁𝖾𝗋) | @DrSilvlX 𝖨𝗇𝖿𝗈: @ArgentumPortfolio 𝖡𝗈𝗍𝗌: @AnonArgBot & @OrdersAgBot ─────────────────────── Кредит: https://telegram.me/addlist/vcAL4AR47uhlY2Iy
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/ArgentumPort

Growth

1897 Aug 2026, 04:01 — 189 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 07:16 — 189 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 04:017 Aug 2026, 07:16
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 188–190 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 07:16189no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:01189first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
121.9%
avg views ÷ 189 subscribers
Avg views / post
230
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (16 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total4,608
Reactions total407
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
96
Links
82

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

407 reactions across 9 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 529410807209921843510726.3%
custom 52855193229181878029723.8%
👾379.09%
🕊348.35%
custom 5211027826748188816297.13%
custom 5316810526196530288286.88%
custom 5400158996550141578245.90%
👻204.91%
custom 5316981843852028827153.69%
custom 540009271661482689971.72%
😈51.23%
custom 539771930050718820320.491%
👀20.491%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 407reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
35
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 20 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
16
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ArgentumPort. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC90 views37 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

🥹🤩 ° 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗽♡𝘀𝘁 ‹🎧› 𝓐𝗿𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝓟𝗼𝗿𝘁 °ᵈᵏᵐ 🥹 #Banner & #Avatar 👻🥹🤩🥹👻#Order 🥹🥹 W♡rking time : 07 hours & 40 minutes Я хочу выходной 🌸 но некогда P.s. спасибо за звёздочку! ────────────────────────── 🥹➷ 🥹𝑹𝒆𝒗𝒊𝒆𝒘𝒔🥹🥹🥹 𝑷𝒓𝒊𝒄𝒆🥹➹ 👻👻👻🥹ф♡йл в комм🥹🥹

custom 528551932291818780211custom 529410807209921843510🕊8custom 54001589965501415784custom 52110278267481888162👾1custom 53169818438520288271

1 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC200 views44 reactions16 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🥹🤩 ° 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗽♡𝘀𝘁 ‹🎧› 𝓐𝗿𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝓟𝗼𝗿𝘁 °ᵈᵏᵐ 🥹 #Banner & #Avatar 👻🥹🤩🥹👻#Order 🥹🥹 W♡rking time : 03 hours & 57 minutes Впервые за долгое время сделала пак на заказ меньше, чем за сутки P.s. Спасибо за звёздочки!! ────────────────────────── 🥹➷ 🥹𝑹𝒆𝒗𝒊𝒆𝒘𝒔🥹🥹🥹 𝑷𝒓𝒊𝒄𝒆🥹➹ 👻👻👻🥹ф♡йл в комм🥹🥹

👾14custom 529410807209921843514custom 528551932291818780213custom 53169818438520288272custom 52110278267481888161

30 Jul 2026, 17:04 UTC193 views67 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🥹🤩 ° 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗽♡𝘀𝘁 ‹🎧› 𝓐𝗿𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝓟𝗼𝗿𝘁 °ᵈᵏᵐ 🥹 #Banner & #Avatar 👻🥹🤩🥹👻#Order 🥹🥹 W♡rking time : 05 hours & 25 minutes С каждым разом считать время заказа все сложнее и сложнее P.s. Зомба, спасибо за звёздочку! Спасибо за звёздочку! ────────────────────────── 🥹➷ 🥹𝑹𝒆𝒗𝒊𝒆𝒘𝒔🥹🥹🥹 𝑷𝒓𝒊𝒄𝒆🥹➹ 👻👻👻🥹ф♡йл в комм🥹🥹

custom 529410807209921843518custom 528551932291818780216🕊14😈5custom 52110278267481888164👾3custom 53168105261965302883👀2

28 Jul 2026, 10:57 UTC260 views66 reactions16 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🥹🤩 ° 𝗡𝗲𝘄 𝗽♡𝘀𝘁 ‹🎧› 𝓐𝗿𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝓟𝗼𝗿𝘁 °ᵈᵏᵐ 🥹 #Banner & #Avatar 👻🥹🤩🥹👻#Order 🥹🥹 W♡rking time : 06 hours & 49 minutes Миллион реакций мне, срочно P.s. спасибо за звёздочки!! Алма, спасибо за звёздочки!! ────────────────────────── 🥹➷ 🥹𝑹𝒆𝒗𝒊𝒆𝒘𝒔🥹🥹🥹 𝑷𝒓𝒊𝒄𝒆🥹➹ 👻👻👻🥹ф♡йл в комм🥹🥹

custom 528551932291818780222custom 529410807209921843516custom 521102782674818881614custom 53168105261965302884custom 54000927166148268994custom 53169818438520288273custom 54001589965501415783

25 Jul 2026, 05:56 UTC275 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52941080720992184352

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ArgentumPort. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 245,586 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[#𝘼𝙜]°𝓐𝗿𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘂𝗺 𝓟𝗼𝗿𝘁 °ᵈᵏᵐ | Дизайнер” (@ArgentumPort), 189 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ArgentumPort.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.