Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ares Lab

Channel

Ares Lab

@Ares_Lab

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

124subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002039542484
TypeChannel
Username@Ares_Lab
DescriptionWelcome. If you found this place it means you invest in Tokens without needing Call channels to find them for you. I'm an exp. dev. I'll display here my work, quality finds and collabs. Owner @Ares_dev
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Ares_Lab

Growth

1247 August 2026 — 124 subscribers9 August 2026 — 124 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 123–125 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 03:02124no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:20124first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
92
Videos
7
Links
62

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

21 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥838.1%
523.8%
👍523.8%
🙏314.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 October 2025 to 6 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Nov 2025, 21:08 UTC137 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Some good news on Development for tomorrow 🙏

👍1

6 Nov 2025, 21:08 UTC121 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Hey guys! Major update on Naia's Telegram Bot. We have a confirmed timeline: Tomorrow, 7PM UTC. This gives everyone extra time to position themselves - accumulate more tokens at current prices if you're planning to hold long term. Let me break down what's happening and what you're getting access to. ═══════════════════════════════════ 🤖 BETA TEST DETAILS ═══════════════════════════════════ Tomorrow at 7PM UTC,

🔥2

30 Oct 2025, 21:05 UTC141 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

ANNOUNCEMENT: We're locking 5% of our team supply to prove we're in it for the long run. Also, this is a good chance to explain the narrative of what we're building better: We're looking to make a quality bot for token discovery, etc. in the future. We will be aiming our advertising at the decentralised market as, this is a space we know well. We are working on the Telegram bot being integrated with AI. Our aim

1🔥1

30 Oct 2025, 09:15 UTC118 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

She looks beautiful next to 50X, isn't it? Maybe it is prophetic

1

30 Oct 2025, 08:32 UTC109 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

NAIA is amazing and such an undervalued gem in my opinion

30 Oct 2025, 08:31 UTC93 viewsread 9 August 2026

That was an amazing post during the best possible timing, unless it's just that time again now. To be very serious our team will push it through the entire day, it is wonderful to see many people being onboarded back that fast

30 Oct 2025, 05:04 UTC121 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Is the chinese market going to open up to NAIA? 🤔 https://t.me/NaiaPortal

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Ares_Lab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 455,955 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ares Lab” (@Ares_Lab), 124 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ares_Lab.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.