Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝐯𝐚𝐫𝐤𝐢𝐬𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐞🐬ྀི🎀

@Archi_beads

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

114subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002226670010
TypeChannel
Username@Archi_beads
DescriptionВладелец - @varkqxx Приятно познакомиться) Др канала -25 августа 🩰 Цель -400 пдп 🫶🏻
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Archi_beads

Growth

1147 Aug 2026, 23:16 — 114 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 06:02 — 114 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 23:169 Aug 2026, 06:02
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 113–115 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 06:02114no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:16114first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
268
Videos
4
Links
17

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

340 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13038.2%
🔥7622.4%
💘4312.6%
custom 5260744482676034859339.71%
❤‍🔥277.94%
🍓102.94%
🥰102.94%
💋82.35%
👍30.882%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 340reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2025 to 1 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Jun 2025, 07:18 UTC208 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026

поздравляю с летом,любимки 🩷🩷

7💘5custom 52607444826760348593

30 May 2025, 12:48 UTC230 views18 reactionsread 9 August 2026

ребята,меня 2 недельки не будет в сети (с завтрашнего дня)🩷 давайте без сильных отписок🙏 через 2 недельки приеду в город и будет много постов с племенными ами)

8🥰5🔥4💘1

23 May 2025, 05:13 UTC303 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🍈🍈🍈🍈🍈🍈 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🍈сплела за 5 часов (вроде норм,зная ,что я плету очень медленно ) 🍈я была в тесте и к счастью успела в срок!!! 🍈автор- @narmki 🍈пусть и плела тревожно(боялась не успеть в срок 🥺 )выгорание я не словила 🎉,я плела прям в удовольствие ) ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ как вам?

9custom 52607444826760348595💘3🔥3❤‍🔥1💋1

18 May 2025, 18:37 UTC291 views47 reactionsread 9 August 2026

набираете 35 реакций -пост 🙏 работа готова и уже сфоткана 🤫

23custom 52607444826760348599🍓8🔥5💘2

13 May 2025, 11:57 UTC339 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🩵голова готова ) 🩵плести приходится быстро(в следующем посте расскажу ) 🩵 те кто догадались кто это ,обязательно пишите в комментарии ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ оценивайте 😍

9🔥5custom 52607444826760348593

11 May 2025, 13:50 UTC213 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026

ищем моего мишутку 🧸

custom 526074448267603485985🔥4

11 May 2025, 13:50 UTC205 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @nika_amiPhoto

всем привееет,я к вам с итогами теста сплели мало человек,но я очень благодарна всем кто сплёл 💋 каналы тестировщиц: @biserinoo @Archi_beads @biseer_ari @beadstryy @Aa_aaed(нет канала) @viksbiserokk @biser383i3 ну я и @nika_ami тестов от меня больше не будет ну а схема уже в продаже и её можно приобрести за 120р🎀 оцениваем этих пупсов

💘74custom 52607444826760348593

10 May 2025, 06:54 UTC210 views25 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

💛💛💛💛💛 💛💛💛💛💛💛 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ ⭐️сплела кстати за 1,5 дня (хотя растянула на 4) 🟡я была в тесте и к счастью успела в срок !!! ✨автор -@nikushk0o 🌀пусть и плела тревожно (боялась не успеть в срок 😪 ) выгорания я не словила 🎉,только наоборот удовольствия очень большое получила ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ жду актива !!!

🔥107💘4💋2custom 52607444826760348592

9 May 2025, 16:05 UTC180 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

с Днём Победы ! 🔥🔥

🔥72👍2

9 May 2025, 05:56 UTC198 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

извините,вот сейчас правильная фотка 🤍) всем спасибо ,кто обратил внимание !! я вас очень люблю 🫶

3🔥2🥰2

8 May 2025, 20:00 UTC225 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

💜💜💜💜💜💜💜 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 💜теперь и почти все детали тела готовы 💜сегодня как то много сплела по сравнению с прошлыми спойлерами 💜кстати с ушком голова мне кажется выглядит милее ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ а вы сейчас что нибудь плетете?

🔥9💘32

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Archi_beads. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 762,482 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐯𝐚𝐫𝐤𝐢𝐬𝐬 𝐛𝐞𝐞🐬ྀི🎀” (@Archi_beads), 114 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Archi_beads.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.