Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for قواعد اللغة العربية

Channel

قواعد اللغة العربية

@Arbic_2027_1

Not marked by Telegram, checked 13 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

25,105subscribers

-1,367 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002220849668
TypeChannel
Username@Arbic_2027_1
Descriptionللتواصل :@Ssc_4064BOT
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held56
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Arbic_2027_1

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

25,10526,47625,790.512 August 2026 — 26,472 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,472 subscribers13 August 2026 — 26,446 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,417 subscribers16 August 2026 — 26,380 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26,356 subscribers18 August 2026 — 26,329 subscribers19 August 2026 — 26,288 subscribers20 August 2026 — 26,253 subscribers21 August 2026 — 26,214 subscribers23 August 2026 — 26,160 subscribers24 August 2026 — 26,133 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,102 subscribers26 August 2026 — 26,067 subscribers27 August 2026 — 26,043 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,018 subscribers29 August 2026 — 26,003 subscribers30 August 2026 — 25,977 subscribers31 August 2026 — 26,074 subscribers1 September 2026 — 26,033 subscribers2 September 2026 — 26,022 subscribers4 September 2026 — 25,974 subscribers6 September 2026 — 25,925 subscribers10 September 2026 — 25,794 subscribers12 September 2026 — 26,476 subscribers13 September 2026 — 26,445 subscribers15 September 2026 — 26,372 subscribers17 September 2026 — 26,322 subscribers27 September 2026 — 26,024 subscribers4 October 2026 — 25,959 subscribers9 October 2026 — 25,849 subscribers13 October 2026 — 25,732 subscribers14 October 2026 — 25,665 subscribers15 October 2026 — 25,633 subscribers16 October 2026 — 25,604 subscribers17 October 2026 — 25,576 subscribers18 October 2026 — 25,555 subscribers19 October 2026 — 25,525 subscribers20 October 2026 — 25,498 subscribers21 October 2026 — 25,468 subscribers23 October 2026 — 25,430 subscribers23 October 2026 — 25,413 subscribers25 October 2026 — 25,381 subscribers25 October 2026 — 25,368 subscribers26 October 2026 — 25,356 subscribers27 October 2026 — 25,340 subscribers28 October 2026 — 25,309 subscribers29 October 2026 — 25,274 subscribers30 October 2026 — 25,256 subscribers31 October 2026 — 25,233 subscribers1 November 2026 — 25,202 subscribers2 November 2026 — 25,184 subscribers3 November 2026 — 25,166 subscribers4 November 2026 — 25,138 subscribers5 November 2026 — 25,121 subscribers6 November 2026 — 25,105 subscribers12 August 20266 November 2026
56 measurements spanning 87 days, net -1,367. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,899–26,682 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 16:4525,105-16
5 Nov 2026, 19:3825,121-17
4 Nov 2026, 22:0025,138-28
3 Nov 2026, 18:0625,166-18
2 Nov 2026, 14:4625,184-18
1 Nov 2026, 18:1925,202-31
31 Oct 2026, 17:4625,233-23
30 Oct 2026, 21:0725,256-18
29 Oct 2026, 23:5725,274-35
28 Oct 2026, 23:3825,309-31
27 Oct 2026, 22:3725,340-16
26 Oct 2026, 21:5725,356-12
25 Oct 2026, 22:0425,368-13
25 Oct 2026, 00:5525,381-32
23 Oct 2026, 23:3125,413-17
23 Oct 2026, 00:4525,430-38
21 Oct 2026, 22:0525,468-30
20 Oct 2026, 15:4725,498-27
19 Oct 2026, 13:3625,525-30
18 Oct 2026, 13:2925,555first reading

Engagement

210 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 121 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.03%
avg views ÷ 25,105 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,260
61 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.504%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
61
of 210 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 56 of 61 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026
Posts held210 (11 July 2026 – 31 October 2026)
Views total76,976
Reactions total351
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 09:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
58
Links
26

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,156 reactions across 182 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥49442.7%
🔥37532.4%
🕊15813.7%
😭655.62%
💔645.54%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 182 of the 210 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,156 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 210 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 31 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 209 we hold a reading for · 0.5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Arbic_2027_1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 210 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 31 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 61 posts held from the last 30 days (4.92%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

31 Oct 2026, 21:27 UTC≈1,030 views17 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @wezaryataa

Posted without readable text

❤‍🔥15🕊2

Signed فَاذْكُرُونِي أَذْكُرْكُمْ

29 Oct 2026, 15:19 UTC≈1,370 views6 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Poll

" عيناكِ أغرقَتا مُدْناً بأكملِها فمن إذا غَرِقَتْ مُدْني سينقذني " ( ما الموقع الاعرابي لمن؟ معللًا)

  1. م. به مقدم وجوبا21%
  2. مبتدأ تلاه فعل متعدٍ استوفى مفعوله39%
  3. اسم مجرور بحرف الجر28%
  4. يُعرب بالتقدير12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥4❤‍🔥1😭1

Signed 𝕌𝕊𝕀𝔽 𖠆

29 Oct 2026, 15:03 UTC≈1,250 views8 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Poll

قال تعالى : ﷽ { وَسِعَ رَبِّي كُلَّ شَيْءٍ عِلْمًا ۗ أَفَلَا تَتَذَكَّرُونَ (80) وَكَيْفَ أَخَافُ مَا أَشْرَكْتُمْ وَلَا تَخَافُونَ } ما خصيصة الهمزة ؟

  1. دخلت على أسلوب الشرط9%
  2. دخلت على الحرف المشبه بالفعل2%
  3. حذفت للتخفيف5%
  4. لها الصدارة على احرف العطف و دخولها على الجملة المنفية84%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥5😭2❤‍🔥1

Signed 𝕌𝕊𝕀𝔽 𖠆

29 Oct 2026, 14:39 UTC≈1,160 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Poll

🔻تريدون أسئلة على النفي او الاستفهام :

  1. الاستفهام.71%
  2. النفي.39%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🔥3

Signed 𝕌𝕊𝕀𝔽 𖠆

28 Oct 2026, 14:04 UTC≈1,410 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

#عــــــــــاجـــــــــــــل 🔴وزارة التربية تعلن جداول امتحانات الدور الثالث للمراحل الدراسية كافة للعام 2025–2026 وحددت اللجنة الدائمة للامتحانات العامة الساعة الواحدة ظهرا موعدا لبدء الامتحانات، وفق التوقيت المحلي لمدينة بغداد داخل العراق وخارجه، على أن ينقل امتحان اليوم الذي يصادف عطلة رسمية إلى اليوم التالي، مع الالتزام بتسلسل الجدول المعلن.

🔥3

Signed 𝕌𝕊𝕀𝔽 𖠆

27 Oct 2026, 14:02 UTC≈1,680 views7 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

🔴 وجهت لجنة التربية النيابية، خلال اجتماعها المنعقد هذا اليوم، خطابًا رسميًا إلى الأمانة العامة لمجلس الوزراء يتضمن مقترحًا بشأن الموافقة على إجراء امتحانات الدور الثالث للطلبة. https://t.me/Arbic_2027_1

🔥6❤‍🔥1

Signed 𝕌𝕊𝕀𝔽 𖠆

24 Oct 2026, 20:44 UTC≈1,630 views10 reactionsread 7 November 2026

كيف أسم استفهام مبني على الفتح في محل نصب حال تلاه فعل تام

🔥10

Signed 𝕌𝕊𝕀𝔽 𖠆

24 Oct 2026, 20:39 UTC≈1,640 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026

فَكَيفَ يُرَجّي المَرءُ دَهراً مُخَلَّداً وَأَعمالُهُ عَمّا قَليلٍ تُحاسِبُه 🔺ما إعراب (كيفَ)؟معلِّلًا. @YousifAldarajibot

❤‍🔥3

Signed 𝕌𝕊𝕀𝔽 𖠆

24 Oct 2026, 20:38 UTC≈1,610 views6 reactionsread 7 November 2026

كيف : أسم استفهام مبني على الفتح في محل نصب حال تلاه فعل تام

🔥6

Signed 𝕌𝕊𝕀𝔽 𖠆

24 Oct 2026, 20:33 UTC≈1,700 views3 reactionsread 7 November 2026

يَوَدُّ الفَتى طولَ السَلامَةِ وَالغِنى فَكَيفَ تَرى طولَ السَلامَةِ يَفعَلُ 🔺ما إعراب (كيفَ)؟معلِّلًا. @YousifAldarajibot

🔥3

Signed 𝕌𝕊𝕀𝔽 𖠆

24 Oct 2026, 20:25 UTC≈1,730 views5 reactionsread 7 November 2026

#هـــــــــــــــام 🔴 وزارة التربية توكّد بأنّ الدوام الرسمي في المدارس يوم غدٍ الأحد يشمل بغداد والمحافظات التي لم تعلن العطلة الرسمية. https://t.me/Arbic_2027_1

🔥4❤‍🔥1

Signed 𝕌𝕊𝕀𝔽 𖠆

24 Oct 2026, 20:19 UTC≈1,840 views11 reactionsread 7 November 2026

العطلة باقية …. فقط بغداد والمحافظات أدناه غير مشمولة بالعطلة.. - بغداد - الانبار - نينوى - كردستان - وجزء من اقضية صلاح الدين https://t.me/Arbic_2027_1

🔥5💔4🕊2

Signed 𝕌𝕊𝕀𝔽 𖠆

Showing the 12 most recent of 210 posts we hold for @Arbic_2027_1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 46 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Oct 2026, 15:19 UTCAnonymous Quiz192 voters

" عيناكِ أغرقَتا مُدْناً بأكملِها فمن إذا غَرِقَتْ مُدْني سينقذني " ( ما الموقع الاعرابي لمن؟ معللًا)

  1. م. به مقدم وجوبا21%
  2. مبتدأ تلاه فعل متعدٍ استوفى مفعوله39%
  3. اسم مجرور بحرف الجر28%
  4. يُعرب بالتقدير12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Oct 2026, 15:03 UTCAnonymous Quiz146 voters

قال تعالى : ﷽ { وَسِعَ رَبِّي كُلَّ شَيْءٍ عِلْمًا ۗ أَفَلَا تَتَذَكَّرُونَ (80) وَكَيْفَ أَخَافُ مَا أَشْرَكْتُمْ وَلَا تَخَافُونَ } ما خصيصة الهمزة ؟

  1. دخلت على أسلوب الشرط9%
  2. دخلت على الحرف المشبه بالفعل2%
  3. حذفت للتخفيف5%
  4. لها الصدارة على احرف العطف و دخولها على الجملة المنفية84%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Oct 2026, 14:39 UTCAnonymous Poll167 voters

🔻تريدون أسئلة على النفي او الاستفهام :

  1. الاستفهام.71%
  2. النفي.39%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

13 Oct 2026, 12:31 UTCAnonymous Quiz116 voters

وَلَستَ الدَهرَ مُتَّسِعًا لِفَضلِ إِذا ما ضِقتَ بِالإِنصافِ ذَرعا دلَّ على معمولي ليس .

  1. اسمها : التاء ، خبرها : الدهرَ .44%
  2. اسمها : التاء ، خبرها : متّسعًا .49%
  3. اسمها : التاء ، خبرها : لفضلِ .7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Oct 2026, 12:23 UTCAnonymous Quiz98 voters

أسِـيرُ ولَـسْـتُ أعلَمُ أيـنَ أمضي غَريبَ الدَّارِ قد ضَيَّعتُ بـعضِي! 🔺س:- عَـيِّن مَعمُولي (لَيسَ) ؟

  1. - اِسْـمُها: الْضَّـمِير المُتَّصِل(التَاء)،. خَـبَّرُها: الجُملَةُ الفِـعْليَّة (أعلَمُ)74%
  2. - اِسْـمُها: (أعلَمُ)، خَـبَّرُها: أينَ أمضي.4%
  3. - اِسْـمُها: الْضَّـمِير المُنفصِل (التَاء)،. خَـبَّرُها: الجُملَةُ الفِـعْليَّة (أعلَمُ)8%
  4. - اِسْـمُها: الْضَّـمِير المُتَّصِل (التَاء)،. خَـبَّرُها: غَريبَ الدَّارِ6%
  5. - اِسْـمُها: غَريبُ الدَّارِ، خَـبَّرُها: أعلَمُ3%
  6. - اِسْـمُها، خَـبَّرُها: I don't know.4%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Oct 2026, 11:12 UTCAnonymous Quiz77 voters

﴿وَلَا يَحْسَبَنَّ الَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا أَنَّمَا نُمْلِي لَهُمْ خَيْرٌ﴾ مَا نَوعُ (مَا)؟

  1. زَائدة كافَّة.48%
  2. مَوصولـة.31%
  3. زَائِدة لِلتَّوكيد.17%
  4. اِستِـفهاميَّة.4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 210 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 31 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

خيره مجانيه استخاره خيرة مجانية
@NU_G5 · 111,046
#1
تمبلر عراقي .
@tumb1riq · 171,982
#2
١٤٢٢ۿہ.
@ll8rsj · 877
#3
قہلبہ
@iraqi_designers · 7,675
#4
𝗜𝗧 𝗜𝗦 𝗦𝗔𝗥𝗔
@szcsr · 446
#5
شهرزاد
@dam_inst · 927 (as read 12 September 2026)
#6
أثـر نـور ❣️
@DGIHIUY · 2,357
#7
حَـبوبِـي
@VXFII · 3,050
#8
مَلاذي 🦋.
@reyamtr979 · 509
#9
لـ علوش 🖤.
@ze_qn · 2,117
#10
𝒜𝒫ℛℐℒ| ابريل ✨
@april9_82 · 499
#11
الـ ميم 🦋.
@Spd9759 · 635
#12
حُزن عراقي | كأنهُ أنا
@rr_rrora · 198,952
#13
مُبعثرة🖤.
@mubth7 · 351
#14
2:22
@shm_hs · 318
#15
ميـلآ️🍂
@m_m9118 · 1,910
#16
آية .
@iiiriiir · 75,606
#17
᷂مروجه
@L_O_V_E_O · 1,659
#18
ִ​. 𓆩 عٌآشٍوِرآء 𓆪 .
@alqaim313_1 · 321
#19
علوش
@NxNkwk · 3,077
#20
القرآن الكريم
@tt_ee4 · 23,364
#21
شخآبيطيッ
@F_3JS · 2,713
#22
أطمئنَان.
@LZDT5 · 4,785
#23
. 𓆩 ألمُصْحَفْ 𓆪 .
@theholyquran71 · 353
#24
مَلاذ 🦋، ادعية ، دينية ، المصحف
@thrthrat97 · 152,185
#25
ayat Hussein𑄻𑄾 ۪ ׄ
@AYilili · 2,426
#26
بَاب التوبُـة
@ssffs · 33,136
#27
حَــوْرَاءُ .
@liHil_6 · 2,270 (as read 12 September 2026)
#28
شمسِين .
@vc6Il · 139,837
#29
رُوح 🖤
@Zaaaqa · 6,849
#30
1xbet
@cc_3rr · 159
#31
مصابيح☁️
@Lights_a · 2,666
#32
علامة استفهام؟
@KIKIKL1 · 17,929
#33
الحشد المقدس
@H0PAA · 910
#34
دوباميّن
@on1y_you · 8,475
#35
لـيتنا لـنّ نلتـقيْ
@taboka2001 · 205
#36
هِبـة الي بتحاول ✨
@HP0SH · 626
#37
عُزلة المُهتدين .
@zz_zzml · 82,417
#38
مَلاذي 🤍.
@malathi4 · 396
#39
ازياء ريفال فساتين
@Rival_fashion1 · 88,489
#40
مَلاذُ العَبدْ .
@I2i0l · 100,072
#41
تذكير :
@Tazkeraet · 19,626
#42
مشَاعر🤎.
@uu45y · 15,267
#43
السادس دفعة 2026
@Poverty_2 · 3,323 (as read 12 September 2026)
#44
القرآن الكريم
@llquraanll · 248,832
#45
عين الحويجة
@eyealhawija · 4,207
#46
Info Plus - انفو بلس
@Infoplus1 · 17,004
#47
معلومات متنوعة
@s_hz_i · 439 (as read 12 September 2026)
#48
كيمياء السادس العلمي
@chemistry146 · 105
#49

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

تمبلر عراقي .
@tumb1riq · 171,982
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 August 2026
خيره مجانيه استخاره خيرة مجانية
@NU_G5 · 111,046
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 August 2026
القرآن الكريم
@tt_ee4 · 23,364
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 17 September 2026
بين السطور
@Beyond_The_Lines_HZ · 18,966
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 1 October 2026
جَبر .
@rro_orri · 24,928
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 13 September 2026
حُزن عراقي | كأنهُ أنا
@rr_rrora · 198,952
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“قواعد اللغة العربية” (@Arbic_2027_1), 25,105 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Arbic_2027_1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.