3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 749–755 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 01:15
750
-4
7 Aug 2026, 17:36
754
no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:05
754
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.6%
avg views ÷ 750 subscribers
Avg views / post
117
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.96%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
19 (8 July 2026 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
1,054
Reactions total
101
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
213 reactions across 17 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
72
33.8%
custom 5355219705760073018
41
19.2%
❤🔥
20
9.39%
🔥
20
9.39%
custom 5456401215334145229
10
4.69%
custom 5366181802329255317
9
4.23%
🥰
6
2.82%
⚡
5
2.35%
👍
5
2.35%
🙏
5
2.35%
💯
4
1.88%
🤗
4
1.88%
🕊
3
1.41%
😱
2
0.939%
🎉
1
0.469%
👎
1
0.469%
👏
1
0.469%
💋
1
0.469%
💘
1
0.469%
🤩
1
0.469%
1 further kind
1
0.469%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 213reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 19 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AradhanaPrema. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
СТРАХ ОДИНОЧЕСТВА
Помните Бриджит Джонс? 🦋Её главный страх — остаться одной.
Она готова терпеть токсичного Дэниела, который ей изменяет. Готова цепляться за Марка Дарси, которого в начале фильма даже не замечает. Готова врать подругам, что у неё «всё отлично».
Лишь бы не быть «той самой подругой, у которой никого нет». 🙈Знакомо?
Мы часто остаемся в отношениях, которые нас не наполняют, не потому-что любим, а потом…
🌙ТАНТРА. Особый вечер. Мой День Рождения и наша общая глубина.
Групповая оффлайн-практика
📅 14 августа (пятница)
⏰19:00 – 22:00
📍Санкт-Петербург
12 августа я стану на год старше и, как мне кажется, на год глубже.
Обычно дни рождения — это про шум, суету и формальные поздравления. Но я хочу отпраздновать свою жизнь иначе. Я хочу разделить этот свет, эту энергию и эту благодарность с вами.
Поэтому 14 августа наша тан…
Мы вернулись с нашего ретрита для пар❤️🔥! Это было волшебно✨
За два дня пары, которые только начинают свой путь вместе, узнали друг о друге больше, чем за все предыдущие месяцы отношений. А те, кто уже давно вместе, смогли вернуться в начало, когда было много влюбленности и присутствия, без рутины и быта.
Каждый участник получил карту своего собственного сердца — понял, какой у него тип привязанности, как это проя…
«500 дней лета» и главная ложь, в которую мы верим о любви🎬
Смотрели фильм «500 дней лета»? Если нет-гляньте)
Том — милый парень, пишет открытки к праздникам, мечтает о настоящей любви. Саммер — загадочная девушка, которая сразу говорит: «Я не ищу серьёзных отношений».
И что делает Том? Он слышит эти слова… и решает, что он-то её изменит. Что он — тот самый, после которого она передумает.
Он влюбляется не в реаль…
Вернулась с фестиваля. Перезагрузка получена ☑️ Пора двигаться дальше!
Впереди парный ретрит (очень предвкушаю его), и после него уже сделаю анонс вечерней групповой тантры! Думаю на 15 августа. Будем тантрить и отмечать мой день рождения ♥️ Можно уже планировать дату, я дам красивую новую практику, которую сама прошла на фестивале и она очень глубоко подействовала на меня! А я даю только то, что пропустила через се…
Я сейчас на фестивале Ecstatic Dance, и, кажется, снова вспоминаю одну очень простую вещь: как же мы, люди, разучились просто быть живыми.
Здесь люди танцуют.
Не для того, чтобы красиво выглядеть. Не для того, чтобы кому-то понравиться. Не потому что «так правильно».
Они просто чувствуют музыку и позволяют телу двигаться так, как ему хочется.
Кто-то смеется. Кто-то закрывает глаза. Кто-то танцует один. Кто-то встре…
Почему вы ссоритесь по одному и тому же сценарию, даже если меняете партнеров? 🎭
Замечали ли вы эту странную карусель в отношениях?
Сегодня вы обижены, молчите и чувствуете себя непонятой Жертвой, а партнер давит на вас и кажется Агрессором.
А через неделю (или даже через час) всё меняется местами: вы взрываетесь, нападаете и становитесь Агрессором, а партнер замыкается, жалеет себя и превращается в Жертву.
Иногда …
Как понять, что человек действительно готов к глубоким и осознанным отношениям? 🤔
В подкасте отвечаю на искренний вопрос подписчика и разбираю, по каким маркерам отличить зрелого партнера (спойлер: эти критерии универсальны и для женщин, и для мужчин).
В этом аудио:
✅ 5 главных критериев эмоциональной зрелости и готовности к близости.
✅ Чек-лист из 5 вопросов, которые стоит органично обсудить на ранних этапах знако…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @AradhanaPrema. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 530,528 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kris | Тантра | Психотерапия” (@AradhanaPrema), 750 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AradhanaPrema.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.