Gold did breakout, so Long it . Place Entry 4173.1 SL:4165.3

Channel
Apzes Crypto
@Apzes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
251subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001847835011 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Apzes |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Apzes |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 07:40 | 251 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:35 | 253 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:43 | 255 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 01:06 | 256 | no change |
| 18 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 256 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 22 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👌 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 September 2025 to 3 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Gold short @cmp SL: 4174.6 Tp 1: 4150 Tp2 :4125
Photo, posted without a caption
13% down All Tps✅
$PEPE Short Entry1: 0.000004 DCA: 0.000004144 SL: 0.00004253
Triggered and dumped✅
$BTC SHORT ENTRY1 : 73.7k DCA: 74.9k Avg Entry: 74.3k SL: 76k (wait for candle close) 4h/1D Targets will be shared upon order trigger.
Hey Fam, Had lost my TG access, Now I have it back, And we are so fucking back😏
Live now: claim.monad.xyz Make sure to disconnect your wallets from other sites
Launch at 12B$ FDV. If they allocate even 20%-30% to the community (which is just my delusional numbers and not likely) the average airdrop would be 4-5 figures easily!
5h more to see. Either you get happiness or get cooked😆🫵🏼
Monad Airdrop Claim on 14th October
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Apzes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@JacobCryptoClanDiscord · 92,739
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 18 August 2026
@PremiumRoseSignal · 107,726
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 September 2026
@Mexc_Signals_Pumps_Trading · 35,688
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Apzes Crypto” (@Apzes), 251 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Apzes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.