هرگز این در باورمان نمیگنجید که آدمها اینهمه سرسخت باشند. هرگز باورمان نمیشد که قلبمان اینهمه تاب داشته باشد. #یانیس_ریتسوس @Aphrodite89
❤3👍3😢3

Channel
@Aphrodite89
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
240subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001393801784 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Aphrodite89 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Aphrodite89 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 12:07 | 240 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:52 | 241 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:32 | 240 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 240 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
152 reactions across 20 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 97 | 63.8% | |
| 👍 | 28 | 18.4% | |
| 😢 | 22 | 14.5% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 3.29% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 152reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 November 2025 to 11 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
هرگز این در باورمان نمیگنجید که آدمها اینهمه سرسخت باشند. هرگز باورمان نمیشد که قلبمان اینهمه تاب داشته باشد. #یانیس_ریتسوس @Aphrodite89
❤3👍3😢3
شب فرو می افتاد... به درون آمدم و پنجره ها را بستم باد با شاخه در آویخته بود. من در این خانه، تنها،تنها، غم عالم به دلم ریخته بود. #هوشنگ_ابتهاج 🍂🖤 @Aphrodite89
❤3😢3
لایی لایی، من به جای تو شکستم تو نبودی، من به سوگ غم نشستم 🍂🖤 @Aphrodite89
❤5😢3
همرنگِ درخت در هجومِ دی، میپایم تا بهار میپایم... #محمدرضا_شفیعیکدکنی ❤️ @mm_shahidi
❤4
مرگ يكبار اتفاق مىافتد، اما ماندن تمرينى روزانه براى فرو نريختن است. بازماندن يعنى ؛ حمل خاطرهها، جاى خالیها، و ادامهدادن زندگى با قلبى كه بارها دفن شده است... 🍂🖤 @Aphrodite89
❤2😢2👍1
شبم از بیستارگی، شبِ گور در دلم پرتو ستارهٔ دور آذرخشم گهی نشانه گرفت گه تگرگم به تازیانه گرفت برسرم آشیانه بست کلاغ آسمان تیره گشت چون پر زاغ مرغ شبخوان که با دلم میخواند رفت و این آشیانه خالی ماند آهوان گم شدند در شب دشت آه از آن رفتگان بیبرگشت... #هوشنگ_ابتهاج 🍂🖤 @Aphrodite89
😢3❤1
نامِ من، #ایران است... ایران، اسم مادرم نبود؛ ایران، اسم خودم بود و هر مصیبت که همه این قرنها بر ایران رفت، نه بر او که بر من رفت؛ و این همه زخم که بر تنش نشست، خالکوبی تاریخ بود بر پیکر رنجورم؛ و هر عزا و هر سوگ که شد، گیسوان مرا بریدند؛ و هرگاه دلش شکست، اشک از چشمان من افتاد. بانویی هزاران سالهام با چهرهای از چین و چروکِ جنگها و صبوریها، با جگری سوخته و آهی بلند و جانی داغدار، به آینه نگاه میکنم، ایران د…
❤7
گفتند بندگی چیست؟ گفت: خدایت آزاد آفرید، آزاد باش. #ابوسعید_ابوالخیر @Aphrodite89
❤4👍4
دنیا به دست اوباش است و نیکان به جرم لیاقت می میرند #بهرام_بیضایی🖤 @Aphrodite89
👍4😢3
گمان میکنم یلدا شبیهترین پدیده است به عشق؛ هر دو خیالِ چیزی هستند که میدانیم واقعیت ندارد، اما وانمود میکنیم واقعیست. چون ما آدمها گاهی دوست داریم خیالات ما واقعی باشند. اولی خیالِ «طولانیترین شب سال» و دومی آرزوی «تمامنشدنیترین خوشبختی دنیا». آیا دروغاند؟ هم آری و هم نه. آیا راستاند؟ هم آری و هم نه. دروغ است که یلدا به صبح نمیرسد، دروغ است که عشق را پایانی نیست. اما راست است که بعضی چیزها - بهترینِ چیز…
❤9😢2
دل است دیگر مثل اناری ترک برمیدارد خواه از دلتنگی یا از حرفی و طعنهای نابهنگام یا از شنیدن عبارتی ناب مثل دوستت دارم ناگاه به هیجان میافتد دل، انارِ تن است باید مراقبش بود ... @Aphrodite89
❤10😢2
به حتم، پایانِ دنیا در یکی از روزهای پاییز است شاید در بلندترین شبِ سال همزمان با رها شدنِ بافتهی موهای دخترکی که به هوای چیدن انار به باغ رفت و دیگر برنگشت... شیما سبحانی @Aphrodite89
❤4👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Aphrodite89. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 752,485 of 1,621,754entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آفرودیت” (@Aphrodite89), 240 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Aphrodite89.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.