Channel
@Apa1nTournament
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
235subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003680014945 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Apa1nTournament |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 9 April 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Apa1nTournament |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 235 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 236 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 9 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
152 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 62 | 40.8% | |
| ❤ | 60 | 39.5% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 6.58% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 4.61% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 2.63% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 1.97% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 1.97% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 1.32% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.658% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 152reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2026 to 17 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤔Как вам турнир без групповой стадии? ✔️Плюсы✔️ • Турнир проходит быстрее • Не нужно следить за очками и матчами(в некоторых сетках) ❌Минусы❌ • Случайный посев может поставить против фаворита и ничего не сделаешь • Меньше матчей, меньше контента • Шансов на камбек меньше 😀Что вы выбирете 🔥 — С группой ❤️ — Без группы 💬APA1N Tournament
🔥29❤10
⭐Предикты на полуфинал нижней сетки Все снова повторяется.. Прав ли Maks? 🔥 — 100% прав ❤️ — В этот раз чуйка подведёт.. 💬APA1N Tournament
🔥10❤8
🌟Итоги предиктов Думаю многи заметили 0 актива в канале последние дни, исправляемся. Однако контента не много - последние игры играются долго, постараемся решить эту проблему в будущем 💬APA1N Tournament
❤5😭2
👍pyzom в тяжёлой борьбе обыгрывают своих соперников 2:1 👍rvltX показали отличную игру, однако до полуфинала нижней сетки им дойти не удалось. Спасибо за игру и ждём вас на наших следующих турнирах! Следующая встреча 👍BFSD vs 👍pyzom Сыграть до 18.04 • Игра будет за выход в финал, так что ждём жёсткую борьбу! 🔥 — Канал просыпается 💬APA1N Tournament
🔥3
😎Предикты на матч перед полуфиналом нижней сетки 💬APA1N Tournament
👍TSPL и 👍C5 берут ап, 👍rvltX и 👍pyzom сразятся в нижней сетке за участие в полуфинале Сыграть до 15.04 ❌Так как команды не играли, предикты мы не учтём 💬APA1N Tournament
☀️Доброе утро, поздравляем всех с пасхой Сегодня будут результаты игр+предиктов и анонсы следующих игр, а также немного информации про следующий турнир 🎧Какое у вас настроение? 🔥 — Отличное, выходной никуда не нужно идти 👍 — 50/50, уже завтра школа( 😭 — Не особо, день не задался сначала 💬APA1N Tournament
👍8🔥4😭1
🔔Итоги предиктов верхней сетки Maks.. в потоке? 🔥 — Ого 💬APA1N Tournament
🔥9🎉1🏆1💯1
👍MO4A выигрывают 2:1 и проходят в финал, где будут ожидать соперника из нижней сетки 👍BFSD упали в нижний полуфинал, у них есть второй шанс отомстить 👀Ожидали такую игру? 🔥 — Да, было очевидно ❤️ — Не ожидал такой исход 💬APA1N Tournament
❤7🔥2
‼️Важное сообщение от CEO APA1N Tournament ✌️Stepan • APA1N: Аниме ху^ня Давай вместе оценим его профиль по 10-бальной шкале @StepanKiber 🔥 — 10-10 ❤️ — 10+ 🏆 — 10/10 💯 — 10 💬APA1N Tournament
❤7👎4💯3🔥2🏆1
💀 Омшащп8щыщц Насколько я понимаю — аналитики не знают предикты друг друга, как Maks постоянно ставит противоположно от других мне не ясно. Может он скрытый гений? 💯 — Так и есть, 100% 💬APA1N Tournament
💯3
🤩Просим проголосовать за наш канал, чтобы мы могли выпускать для вас больше контента 1️⃣Необычные реакции 2️⃣Оформление канала 3️⃣Истории С каждым бустом наш канал становится лучше. Благодарим каждого кто проголосовал😄 💬APA1N Tournament
❤4👀2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Apa1nTournament. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 642,881 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“APA1N Tournament” (@Apa1nTournament), 235 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Apa1nTournament.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.