5 measurements spanning 23 days, net +36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 106–152 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
31 Aug 2026, 00:46
147
+20
24 Aug 2026, 05:42
127
+15
16 Aug 2026, 14:14
112
+1
9 Aug 2026, 07:00
111
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:50
111
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
18.4%
avg views ÷ 147 subscribers
Avg views / post
27.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
48.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 8 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
8 (14 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
27
Reactions total
13
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
92 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5228826622194385646
33
35.9%
custom 5231468435103319156
16
17.4%
custom 5299018233330829785
13
14.1%
custom 5258221099195340507
11
12.0%
custom 5256107855026641200
8
8.70%
custom 5242318609119741294
7
7.61%
custom 5461144864978668701
4
4.35%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🍀 Наши книги июля
Покажу, что мы читали с Милей (5.9 л) в прошлом месяце:
📖 «Площадь картонных часов» Л. Яхнин — чудесный текст и волшебные иллюстрации В. Чижикова.
📖 «Золотой голубь» М. Аржиловская — ароматная книга. Сюжет лично мне не понравился, но такой тип книг подходит для разнообразия чтения.
📖 «Басни» И. Крылов — первое знакомство дочки с миром иносказаний. Читали по одной басне в день, останавливались и …
🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤 отмечался День дружбы, и в честь этого мы с девочками #ВместеОКнигах решили сделать подборку книг о друзьях.
📚 В нашей домашней библиотеке много историй, но эта тема заставила меня остановиться и задуматься: а в каких книгах есть настоящая, искренняя дружба? Ответ пришёл сам собой — чешский кротик и его друзья! Ведь эти добрые истории, по которым сняты мультфильмы без слов, знакомы каждому с детства.
💐 У …
Лето как выходные. Такое же прекрасное, и так же быстро проходит. Июнь – это пятница, июль – суббота, август – воскресенье.
Марина Цветаева
🍓 А у меня новая книга. Покажите и вы, что сейчас читаете!
#моечтение
⛅️ Очень мне нравится это стихотворение. И хотя мы живём не в Санкт-Петербурге, погода у нас похожая.
За окном +8. Лето.
Летом в Питере жара!
Ты раздет, и я раздета.
Речка, солнце, хванчкара.
За окном +8. Осень.
Дождь-зануда моросит.
Мы с тобою куртки носим.
Питер листьями шуршит.
За окном зима. +8.
Заблудился где-то снег.
Листья с почками елозят, -
Распуститься или нет.
Вот пришла весна! +8.
Красота и благодать…
🎨 Читая с дочками книгу «Про Белочку, Тамарочку и других», я подумала, что стиль иллюстраций кажется мне знакомым.
Оказалось, что имя художника — Ирина Гришанова. Мне стало интересно, какие ещё книги она оформляла, и обнаружилось, что у нас дома уже собралась мини-коллекция с её работами:
🤩«Майсси из цветочного домика»
🤩«Дина и Дракош: секреты воспитания»
🤩«Дина и Дракош наводят порядок»
🤩«Больше одного: очень друж…
«Про Белочку, Тамарочку и других»
Леонид Пантелеев
Иллюстрации: И. Гришанова
Издательство «Качели»
📖 В книгу вошли 4 рассказа о сестричках Белочке и Тамарочке, а также несколько историй о других ребятах. Хотя не все произведения вызвали у нас восторг, сборник идеально подошёл по возрасту Миле (5.9 л).
Наши впечатления о наиболее запомнившихся рассказах:
🌊 «На море» — вызвал вопросы. Странное поведение мамы (отпуст…
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @Anyutini_knijki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Анютины думки ✨” (@Anyutini_knijki), 147 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Anyutini_knijki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
