3 measurements spanning 2 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 385–386 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Sept 2026, 13:42
385
-1
9 Sept 2026, 19:22
386
no change
9 Sept 2026, 18:47
386
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
49.9%
avg views ÷ 385 subscribers
Avg views / post
192
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
10 (24 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
768
Reactions total
79
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Sept 2026, 19:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 22s
Average length
41s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
218 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
155
71.1%
❤🔥
24
11.0%
👏
15
6.88%
😍
9
4.13%
🔥
7
3.21%
🥰
4
1.83%
👍
3
1.38%
👎
1
0.459%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 218 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сегодня, 2 сентября, на Малой сцене состоялась премьера спектакля «Коля Красоткин» по мотивам романа Ф. М. Достоевского «Братья Карамазовы»
Поздравляем всех создателей с первой премьерой в 129-м театральном сезоне!
Режиссер — Максим Меламедов
Художник-постановщик — Юлиана Лайкова
Художник по свету — Эмиль Авраменко
Видеохудожник — Михаил Купрыгин
Хореограф — Михаил Колегов
Помощник режиссера — Юлия Сосновская
В ро…
Ездила домой в Самару на несколько деньков. Очень была рада этому, потому что редко удается вырваться. Но каждый раз всего на 2-3 дня((
Стараюсь увидеться с близкими, но не каждый раз успеваю «обойти» всех.
Селяви 🟢🟢
Я не умею жить БлОгЕрСкУю жизнь 🙃
Это лето очень насыщенное! 🤩
И мое желание постить контент тоже казалось мне очень насыщенны… Похоже я ошибалась 🤎
🟣Мне хочется быть в моменте, и не тратить время на отбор фото/видео пока я “здесь и сейчас”. То есть выкладывать в режими реального времени противоречит моим же интересам
🟡Когда я сильно устаю по разным причинам (работа, впечатления, процесс) - я всегда выберу сон/отды…
«Вальс-бостон» — 200
Кажется, только недавно мы готовились к первой читке, а уже завтра мюзикл «Вальс-бостон» пересечет отметку в 200 спектаклей.
За десять месяцев в прокате мы принимали в зале десятки звездных гостей и стали местом, где рождались самые искренние эмоции. Вы приходили к нам на первые свидания, отмечали важные семейные даты, праздновали дни рождения, а однажды прямо со сцены «Вальс-бостона» прозвучал…
Отбираю фотки с отпуска!
С 600+ почистила до 200+ 😧 😬 🤭
Но это все равно очень много, и нужно еще будет это организовать в посты для инсты и для тут. Кропотливая работа у этих блогеров на самом деле ахах 🤡
Ну ничего, я справлюсь!
Тише едешь - дальше будешь…
(тем временем я, которая еще не выложила фотки с поездки 2х годичной давности…🙃)
❤16👏8❤🔥1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @AnutkaZateeva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
МХТ имени А. П. Чехова @mxatchekhova · 24,841 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 15 September 2026
ПОСТУПЛЕНИЕ В ТЕАТРАЛЬНЫЙ @iduvteatralny · 28,392 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The funny Zateya 🤪” (@AnutkaZateeva), 385 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AnutkaZateeva.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
