https://youtu.be/S-XlGIod1CI

Channel
Anti-work quotes
@AntiworkQuotes
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
445subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002029593813 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AntiworkQuotes |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AntiworkQuotes |
Topic
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 445 | +2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 04:58 | 443 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 446 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 449 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 448 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 447 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:15 | 448 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:03 | 448 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 18 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
162 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 67 | 41.4% | |
| 💯 | 36 | 22.2% | |
| 🔥 | 30 | 18.5% | |
| 😁 | 18 | 11.1% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 3.09% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 2.47% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
❤11
Video, posted without a caption
🔥1
"We long ago reached a point where hand-built furniture became a luxury good and, in many ways, that should serve as an indicator to many how little their dollar is actually worth now. When the makers can't afford their own work, something is wrong. Carpenters living under bridges (yes that has been a real thing for years in Vancouver), grocery store workers going hungry, daycare workers unable to afford having kids…
❤3
video: thegreekachilles
😁1
valuing someone based on how productive they are is dehumanising
💯8❤1
what is the point of an organized economy if we are working ourselves to death and for practically nothing at all?
💯10❤5
Photo, posted without a caption
😁3💯2
no shame in admitting this. we need to abolish forced labour.
🔥10
things you don't need to feel guilty about
❤15😁2
soft launch your sick leaves and go on long sick leaves
🔥3👍1
the real revolution is when we no longer force anyone to work and find ways of managing things collectively and voluntarily, without direct or systemic coercion
💯16
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AntiworkQuotes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@POPULARXFRONT · 31,217
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Anti-work quotes” (@AntiworkQuotes), 445 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AntiworkQuotes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.