Channel
@AntiJhamiyaAshari
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002395682304 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @AntiJhamiyaAshari |
| Description | • Данный канал не поддерживает никакие террористические и вообще организации в принципе. Не призывает к экстремизму, ненависти |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 9 December 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/AntiJhamiyaAshari |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:05 | 3 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:28 | 3 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 9 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
34 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5260654799463923312 | 8 | 23.5% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 20.6% | |
| custom 5260404127992658473 | 4 | 11.8% | |
| custom 5260500288015448407 | 4 | 11.8% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 11.8% | |
| custom 5294114871032439475 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 5.88% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 2.94% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 9 December 2024 to 13 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Есть те кто говорят, что эпоха саляфов закончилась. Каково ваше мнение ? Шейх Салих аль-Фаузан (حَفِظَهُ الله ) : Это его время закончилось! Потому что он не любит саляфов, и не желает следовать их манхаджу. А что касается ахлю сунну, то эпоха праведных предшественников осталась, и будет до наступления часа. الاجابات الفاصلة على الشبهات الحاصلة
Photo, posted without a caption
👍2🔥1
Язычники, когда камень не отвечает на их жертвоприношения и молитвы🤪
🔥2😁2
Невежество лидера Аш’аритов еретико-Имама Абуль Хасана Аль-Ашари, его ложь на Аллаха, противоречие Сахабам и Таби’инам. Ибн Манда аль Ханбали про него Нам сообщил Абу Амр, он сказал: Нам рассказал Абу Хатим, он сказал: Нам рассказал Али ибн Марзук аль-Хашими, он сказал: Нам рассказал Юсуф ибн Аби Зура от Аби Бистама от Салиха ад-Даххана от Ибн Аббаса он сказал: К нему пришел Наджда аль-Харуджи и сказал: "О Абу Абба…
custom 52606547994639233123
К Аллаху = На Небо, Разгром Аш’аритских убеждений, разрушение Та’уиля АбдулЛах ибн Ма’суд придает место Лику Аллаха, Ангел берет слова и поднимается с ними на Небо, пока не дойдет к Месту Лика Аллаха + к Нему (на Небо) восходят благие слова и праведные дела возносят их к Аллаху (На Небо) Мухаммад ибн Исмаил аль-Ахмаси рассказал мне, сказав: Джафар ибн Аун сообщил мне от Абдуррахмана ибн Абдуллаха аль-Масуди, от Абду…
custom 52604041279926584733custom 52605002880154484073
Пишет ибн Манда аль-Ханбали 310-395 г.х: И это качество зиндиков (еретиков)-аш'аритов, которые появились в эту эпоху. Они отвернулись от Корана и Сунны, и ввели людей в заблуждение своими сомнительными доводами, противоречащими преданиям.
❤1❤🔥1🔥1custom 52604041279926584731
Ашариты не из ахлю ас-Сунна ва аль-джамаа !!!
👍2custom 52605002880154484071custom 52941148710324394751
Спросили шейха Салиха аль-Фаузана (да сохранит его Аллах): «Зачем нужно предостережение от приверженцев нововведений, когда умма во вражде с иудеями, христианами и светским образом (альмания)?» Шейх ответил: «Мусульмане не смогут противостоять иудеям и христианам, пока они не противостоят тому нововведению, которое среди них, и не вылечат эти болезни! Только потом они смогут противостоять иудеям и христианам. Однако…
👍2custom 52606547994639233121
Поняли да? Бог свидетельствует ему 🤣
custom 52606547994639233124
Абуль Хасан Аль Аш’ари называет себя атеистом + Абуль Хасан Аль Аш’ари вышел из мутазилизма и стал атеистом! 🙍♂️Абу Али аль-Мукри сказал: "Я слышал, как Абу Абдуллах аль-Хумрани говорил: "Однажды я присутствовал на похоронах в Басре, когда умершего хоронили. Мы стояли на краю могилы, и аль-Ашари стоял рядом со мной. Могильщик говорил: "О Аллах, расширь для него его могилу" - или он сказал: "расширь его вход" - "и …
❤🔥1👍1custom 52941148710324394751
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @AntiJhamiyaAshari. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Anti-Jahmiya” (@AntiJhamiyaAshari), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AntiJhamiyaAshari.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.