2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 55–57 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 07:45
56
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:36
56
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
33.9%
avg views ÷ 56 subscribers
Avg views / post
19.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held
20 (6 April 2026 – 1 August 2026)
Views total
19
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
168
Videos
47
Links
137
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 50s
Average length
55s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5
55.6%
👍
4
44.4%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 April 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Forwarded from @DemokratischerWiderstandTelegramPhoto
Am 1. August 2020 fand in Berlin eine der größten demokratischen Demonstrationen in den den Jahrhunderten der deutschen Geschichte statt. Der Polizeifunk sprach bereits am Mittag von »800.000 Teilnehmern«, weitere Menschen strömten hinzu, trotz der brutalen Versuche des Regimes, die Versammlung niederzuschlagen und die Zufahrt zu erschweren. Die gleichgeschaltete Konzern- und Staatspresse meldete zunächst »17.000«, s…
🎬 Ich bin wieder auf Tour mit „WARUM ICH – Wolf D. Kroll“ 🎬
📍 Am 27. Juni 2026 im Kino am Rathaus in Oelde!
🕊️ Wir möchten ein Zeichen gegen den Kriegswahn in Deutschland setzen.
⚠️ Man versucht uns weiszumachen, man könne Frieden nur durch Kriegstüchtigkeit sichern. Doch eine solche Botschaft wurde den Menschen schon einmal verkauft und wie das ausgegangen ist, können wir heute in den 📚 Geschichtsbüchern lesen.
…
🕊 AUFRUF ZUM FRIEDEN – WIR SIND VIELE! 🕊
Es reicht! Die weltweite Kriegstreiberei muss ein Ende haben. Am Samstag, den 01. August 2026, gehen wir in Berlin gemeinsam auf die Straße. Unser Ziel ist unmissverständlich: Wir wollen Weltfrieden!
Unsere Forderungen:
❌ Stoppt alle Rüstungsexporte! Frieden schafft man niemals mit Waffen.
❌ Keine weitere Unterstützung der Ukrainischen Regierung! Wir wollen Diplomatie statt …
This is the ultimate humiliation. Not even your resignation belongs to you anymore. The US President announced it first.
https://redd.it/1ud9e2g
@r_latestagecapitalism
Ich gehe fest davon aus, demnächst in erheblichem Umfang entschädigt zu werden und zu den Zahlungen hohe und höchste Auszeichnungen in pompösen öffentlichen Veranstaltungen verliehen zu bekommen.
Andernfalls: Vielleicht sollte ich in Betracht ziehen, dem hitzköpfigen, aber verständlichen Rat zu folgen, einfach mal eines der perfidesten Dreckschweine, die mir all das angetan haben, öffentlich brutal zusammenzuschlage…
»Die Erfahrung hat uns bis heute noch immer bewiesen, daß unsere Revolutionäre, sobald sie nur zur Macht gelangt sind, sich auf die Staatsräson berufen, daß sie dann Polizeimethoden gebrauchen und die Gerichtsbarkeit als eine Waffe ansehen, die sie gegen ihre Feinde mißbrauchen können. Die parlamentarischen Sozialisten entziehen sich dieser allgemeinen Regel durchaus nicht; sie halten an dem alten Staatskultus fest; …
Vielen Dank an Ole Nymoen für die Ehrlichkeit, zuzugeben, bei Corona falsch gelegen zu haben. Nur auf dieser Grundlage ist eine Aussöhnung der Gesellschaft möglich. Dass viele Linke während Corona lange Zeit so blind dem Staat geglaubt haben, hat bei mir - ebenfalls einer Linken - über lange Zeit schwerste Entfremdungsgefühle ausgelöst. Ich habe das als schweren Verrat an linken Werten empfunden. Das Offensichtliche …
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AnselmLenz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Termine NichtOhneUns.de: Gehen Sie zu einem der lokalen Montagsspaziergänge oder regelmäßigen Versammlungssterminen an anderen Wochentagen?
Montagsspaziergang40%
regelmäßige Versammlung an anderem Wochentag25%
nur Großdemos oder Jahrestage44%
noch nie11%
The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 April 2026 to 1 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“28. März | Anselm Lenz” (@AnselmLenz), 56 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AnselmLenz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
