4 measurements spanning 5 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,930–4,938 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 18:48
4,931
-4
10 Aug 2026, 04:56
4,935
-2
7 Aug 2026, 10:45
4,937
no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:34
4,937
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 28 May 2023 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 October 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
425 reactions across 7 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
72
16.9%
👏
70
16.5%
❤
66
15.5%
🎉
56
13.2%
🔥
56
13.2%
😁
53
12.5%
🥰
47
11.1%
🤡
2
0.471%
☃
1
0.235%
🙊
1
0.235%
🦄
1
0.235%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 425reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2023 to 24 October 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Pepina 2.0 🔸
Pepina dev launched this, it will launch today 12.30 pm utc. I have been calling pepina and it gave huge gains over 40x, it was on eth and this one will be on bsc. I'm looking forward to seeing how this goes. As always if you can't get early it would be better to wait for a dips
Telegram: https://t.me/PepinaBscPortal
Twitter: https://twitter.com/PepinaBsc
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥It is Prelaunch and already posted on kob…
🐆 Panther Calls Giveaway Announcement!
🔥 Prize pool: 1 BNB
🏆 Winner: 0.5 BNB to 2 lucky peoples.
🏆 Giveaway Bot Link: https://t.me/PantherCallsGiveawayBot
👀 How to Participate?
1. Start the bot.
2. Complete the small task.
3. Click on participate button.
4. Send your bsc wallet address.
5. Done, you have participated in giveaway!
🆘 Note: It is mondatry to be a member of PantherGemsCalls to win. We will check whil…
On Chain Dynamics
Prelaunch
Brought to me by a based marketer who we printed with on the previous one! so there’s a lot of potential for this one apes! They raised 290 ETH during their presale and had a 50 ETH private sale too! If you catch a good entry or any decent dips I believe it can do well!
On-Chain Dynamics the most advanced, accessible, and affordable all-in-one trading platform on the market! launching 4t…
On-Chain Dynamics 🔹
They revealed that their last project was doing well. This one's fairlaunch is live and will end in a day. Build a nice utility (OCD trading tools) in which there will be sniper bots, copy trading and stuff. This will be 0 tax, KYC'd and audited
The whole growth strategy is being done by same company that has done it for 0KN, Devs are different and all World-Class
https://www.pinksale.finance/l…
👍 @solidusaichat
🟥 AITECH - Join the future wave with Solidus Ai Tech!
Experience the future with Solidus: An eco-friendly HPC Data Centre in Europe, combined with pioneering deflationary AITECH token. AIaaS, BaaS, IaaS services, and a marketplace for devs. Your gateway to the Solidus ecosystem!
📄 $AITECH CA: 0x2d060ef4d6bf7f9e5edde373ab735513c0e4f944
CEX's Listing: August 28, 11:00AM UTC
🪙 Gate.io| 📈 Bitget | 📈 ME…
Hello Anonymous Family!
I have deleted all post from now I'll provide your only legit calls which can make good profits.
I'll always do my full research before post, no paid calls will post here!
NFA || DYOR 😒👺
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @AnonymousGemsCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@AnonymousGemsCalls named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@panthercallsgiveawaybot named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
@bnbfaucetpaygiveawaybot named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Anonymous Gems Calls” (@AnonymousGemsCalls), 4,931 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AnonymousGemsCalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.