Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝑨𝒓𝒄𝒉𝒊𝒗𝒆, 𝑨𝒏𝒐𝒏𝒚𝒎𝒐𝒖𝒔, 𝑩𝒖𝒍𝒍𝒔𝒉𝒊𝒕

Channel

𝑨𝒓𝒄𝒉𝒊𝒗𝒆, 𝑨𝒏𝒐𝒏𝒚𝒎𝒐𝒖𝒔, 𝑩𝒖𝒍𝒍𝒔𝒉𝒊𝒕

@AnnasAnonymous

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

28subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002358529002
TypeChannel
Username@AnnasAnonymous
Descriptionقرار بود اینجا برای ناشناس‌ها باشه، اما در واقع آرشیوه. @MelancolieHermes_bot http://t.me/HidenChat_Bot?start=8040724764
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 September 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/AnnasAnonymous

Growth

288 September 2026 — 28 subscribers12 September 2026 — 28 subscribers8 September 202612 September 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27–29 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 17:2328no change
8 Sept 2026, 11:1728first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
80.5%
avg views ÷ 28 subscribers
Avg views / post
22.6
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026
Posts held20 (25 August 20267 September 2026)
Views total451
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Sept 2026, 17:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
23
Videos
1
Links
32

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
26s
Average length
26s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

7 Sept 2026, 11:45 UTC25 viewsread 12 September 2026
Forwarded from @Annacdaily

ادامه‌ی حرفام رو هم باید میفرستادم تا سایدم بیشتر مشخص بشه #camellia

Signed 𝘔𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𖤝࿐

7 Sept 2026, 11:45 UTC25 viewsread 12 September 2026

مثلا من خیلیا رو دیدم که بعد معروف شدن جوجی، فنش شدن خب این عادیهههه چون قرار نیس به محض متولد شدن جوجی رو بشناسی... مامانت که نیس. اما یهویی متنفر شدن از مردها؟ تابلوئه صرفا دنبالش میکنی چون ترند شده. از وقتی بدنیا اومدی مردا رو میدیدی ولی تازه یادت افتاده که ازشون متنفر بشی؟

Signed 𝘔𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𖤝࿐

7 Sept 2026, 11:45 UTC26 viewsread 12 September 2026

ببین اینکه به یه فیلم یا سلبریتی یا سبک استایل و چیزای اینجوری علاقه‌مند بشی چون بعد ترند شدنشون باهاشون اشنا شدی اوکیه... ادم که همه‌چیز رو قبل از ترند شدنشون نمیشناسه که اما اینکه یه سبک تفکر رو دنبال کنی، دقیقا بیشتر نشونه‌ی بی‌هویت بودنته چون عقاید و افکار چیزی نیستن که نیاز به ترند شدن داشته باشن تا تو باهاشون اشنا بشی و از اول توی ذهنت بودن

Signed 𝘔𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𖤝࿐

6 Sept 2026, 09:28 UTC8 viewsread 12 September 2026
Forwarded from @AnnacdailyVideo

Video, posted without a caption

Signed 𝘔𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𖤝࿐

6 Sept 2026, 09:28 UTC25 viewsread 12 September 2026
Forwarded from @Annacdaily

والا،‌ استانداردترن؟! آمریکایی لهجه مستقلی نیست. درسته توی کشورها، هر شهر و استانی ممکنه لهجه متفاوت داشته باشن، اما علاوه بر اینکه مال آمریکا گسترده‌تره، حاصل ترکیب لهجه‌های مردم سراسر دنیاست که به آمریکا مهاجرت کردند.

Signed 𝘔𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𖤝࿐

6 Sept 2026, 09:28 UTC19 viewsread 12 September 2026
Forwarded from @Annacdaily

بچه‌ها یه چیزی بگم؟ لهجه‌ی آمریکایی اصلا و ابدا استاندارد نیست😭😭😭 حتی برعکس... کسایی که آمریکا بزرگ شدن ولی زبان دوم دارن باهاش مشکل اساسی دارن... نکنید... زشته... سر چیزی که استاندارد نیست اینقدر غیرتی نشید... تا بحثشه یه چیز بی‌بط ولی جالب برای خودم بگم... ما خودمون از نظر تاجیک‌ها و افغان‌ها "ایران" رو متفاوت تلفظ می‌کنیم... #Sana

Signed 𝘔𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𖤝࿐

6 Sept 2026, 09:28 UTC15 viewsread 12 September 2026
Forwarded from @Annacdaily

یک جورهایی ری‌اکت‌ها همه دارن می‌شن در تایید حرفم.

Signed 𝘔𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𖤝࿐

6 Sept 2026, 09:28 UTC7 viewsread 12 September 2026
Forwarded from @Annacdaily

این هم خودش یجور مسخره کردن لهجه‌س #camellia

Signed 𝘔𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𖤝࿐

6 Sept 2026, 09:28 UTC6 viewsread 12 September 2026
Forwarded from @Annacdaily

بعد چندتا چیزشون بامزه‌ست. اول اینکه اکثرشون وقتی با لهجه به اصطلاح فارسی، انگلیسی حرف می‌زنن، بیشتر اوقات حتی برای انگلیسی‌زبان‌ها قابل فهم‌تره تا وقتی که زور می‌زنن آمریکین تلفظ کنند. چون اون اولی در واقع بیان خام کلمه‌ست با ته‌لهجه‌ای که فیزیولوژیشون عادت کرده، ولی‌ توی دومی در حال کش‌وقوس دادن عمدی‌ان و شاید کلمات رو حتی نامفهوم‌تر بیان کنند. یکی دیگه از چیزهای بامزه اینه که،‌ اگر کسی ازشون بپرسه ایرانی هستی؟ ا

Signed 𝘔𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𖤝࿐

6 Sept 2026, 09:28 UTC5 viewsread 12 September 2026
Forwarded from @Annacdaily

به عنوان کسایی که یه عمر میگفتن "فوکوس" زیادی حرکت زشتی نیست؟ به من چه... #Sana

Signed 𝘔𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𖤝࿐

6 Sept 2026, 09:28 UTC5 viewsread 12 September 2026
Forwarded from @Annacdaily

در واقع حتی بیشتر از همه شامل ایرانی‌های دیگه می‌شه. می‌بینی زیر کلیپ قدیمی محمدرضا شاه هم یک عالمه آدم دارن لهجه‌ش رو مسخره می‌کنند😭 و حتی خیلی از ایرانی‌ها این شکلی‌ان که مثلاً «لهجه اسپانیایی‌ها و روس‌ها و فلانی‌ها خیلی هاته، کاش لهجه‌شون رو حفظ کنن، لعنت به نژادپرستی وایت آمریکایی😢» ولی همین افراد، کافیه یکی ته‌لهجه فارسی یا عربی و هندیش واضح باشه تا جر بخورن از خنده و بولیش کنند.

Signed 𝘔𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𖤝࿐

6 Sept 2026, 09:28 UTC6 viewsread 12 September 2026
Forwarded from @Annacdaily

این چیزی که حتی خارجی‌ها هم توی کشورهای پرمهاجر مثل کانادا و امارات و استرالیا بهش پرداختن، اینه که بین ایرانی‌ها زیاد پیش میاد طرف هی لهجه انگلیسی بقیه رو مسخره یا تحقیر کنه. برای سایر کشورها عادی‌تره که مثلاً طرف فرانسوی یا هندیه، یا همون لهجه انگلیسی حرف بزنه. ولی ایرانی‌ها شدیداً کسایی که با لهجه خودشون انگلیسی حرف می‌زنن، خصوصا ایرانی‌های دیگه رو، مسخره می‌کنن. این فقط توی خارج هم نیست، همین ایران. در واقع قبل

Signed 𝘔𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘧𝘪𝘤𝘢𖤝࿐

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @AnnasAnonymous. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝑨𝒓𝒄𝒉𝒊𝒗𝒆, 𝑨𝒏𝒐𝒏𝒚𝒎𝒐𝒖𝒔, 𝑩𝒖𝒍𝒍𝒔𝒉𝒊𝒕” (@AnnasAnonymous), 28 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AnnasAnonymous.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.